Gedrag & gezondheid

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 117–124 | Cite as

Bridge over Troubled Water

Resultaten van onderzoek naar receptiviteit
  • Rien van UdenEmail author
  • Jos Pieper
  • Hans Alma


Bridge over troubled water. Results of research on receptivity

In this paper, we describe research on our Receptivity Scale, developedin response to some of the problems we met, when using Kenneth Pargament’s religious coping scales in the Netherlands (cf. Alma, Pieper, & Van Uden, 2003). The main problem with Pargament’s threefold conceptualisation of religious coping (self-directing, deferring, and collaborative) is theunderlying view of an active, personal God. The Receptivity Scale does justice to the idea of a more impersonal God, which is probably more common in the secularised Netherlands. Furthermore, the scale takes into account that people are not always directly focused on the solution of problems, either with or without God. The scale was administered to two samples in Belgium and two samples in The Netherlands. We compare (i) the scores of the respondents on the scale with their scores on other measures of religiosity and other psychological measures, and (ii) the scores of theology students with the scores of psychology students. We come to the conclusion that between the attitudes of basic trust on the one hand, and trust in a personal God, on the other hand, there are different degrees of relating to the transcendent in times of trouble.


  1. Alferi, S.M., Culver, J.L., Carver, C.S., Arena, P.L., & Antoni, M.H. (1999). Religiosity, religious coping, and distress. A prospective study of Catholic and Evangelical Hispanic women in treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Journal of Health Psychology, 4,343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alma, H.A., Pieper, J.Z.T., & Uden, M.H.F. van (2003). When I find myself in times of trouble: Pargament’s religious coping scales in the Netherlands. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 24, 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., & Weintraub, J.K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R.S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Delongis, A., & Gruen, R.J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50,992–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hutsebaut, D. (1996). Post-critical belief: A new approach to the religious attitude problem. Journal of Empirical Theology, 9,48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Koenig, H.G., Cohen, H.J., Blazer, D.G., Pieper, C., Meador, K.G., Shelp, F., Goli, V., & DiPasquale, B. (1992). Religious coping and depression among elderly, hospitalized medically ill men. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149,1693–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Luchtmeijer, G., Verbiest, K., & Wouters, I. (2001). Spiritualiteit, een bepaling van het concept: Een zoektocht naar eenheid in de veelheid.Ongepubliceerd manuscript. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
  8. Pargament, K.I., Kennell, J., Hathaway, W., Grevengoed, N., Newman, J., & Jones, W. (1988). Religion and the problem-solving process: Three styles of coping. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 27,90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pargament, K.I., Koenig, H.G. & Perez, L.M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56,519–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pargament, K.I., Smith, B.W., Koenig, H.G., & Perez, L.M. (1998). Patterns of positive and negative religious coping with major life stressors. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37,710–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Parker, G.B., & Brown, L.B. (1982). Coping behaviors that mediate between life events and depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39,1386–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ploeg, H.M. van der, Defares, P.B. & Spielberger, C.D. (1980). Handleiding bij de Zelf-Beoordelingsvragenlijst. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  13. Suls, J., David, J.P., & Harvey J.H. (1996). Personality and coping. Three generations of research. Journal of Personality, 64,711–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wong-McDonald, A. (2000). Surrender to God: An additional coping style. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 28,149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.

Personalised recommendations