Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Ambulatory surgery update

Mise a jour en chirurgie ambulatoire

  • 219 Accesses

  • 10 Citations

Conclusion

Ambulatory surgery today represents a new challenge for the anaesthetist as the focus has shifted to the bottom line: cost containment and competitive quality care. The perioperative anaesthetist can apply much of the lessons learned in hospital-based ambulatory surgery and apply them to all practice settings in order to maintain high quality anaesthesia with favourable outcomes.

Conclusion

La chirurgie ambulatoire représente aujourd’hui un nouveau défi pour l’anesthésiste dans la mesure où l’accent s’est déplacé vers la ligne du bas: des soins de qualité et un contrôle des coûts. L’anesthésiste comme médecin périopératoire peut utiliser la plupart des leçons apprises dans le contexte de la chirurgie ambulatoire hospitalière et les appliquer à tous les environnements pour maintenir une anesthésie de haute qualité avec des résultats favorables.

References

  1. 1

    Twersky RS, Koch M. “Practice options: considerations in setting up an office-based anesthesia practice. ASA Newsletter 1997; 61: 30–2.

  2. 2

    Wiklund RA, Rosenbaum SH. Medical Progress. Anesthesiology (First of Two Parts). N Eng J Med 1997; 337: 1132–11.

  3. 3

    Fischer SP. Development and effectiveness of an anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic in a teaching hospital. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 196–206.

  4. 4

    Twersky RS. Patient and procedure selection for adult ambulatory surgery. IARS Refresher Course Lecture, 1998; Orlando, Florida.

  5. 5

    Perez A, Plannel J, Bacardaz C, et al. Value of routine preoperative test: a multicentre study in four general hospitals. Br J Anaesth 1995; 74: 250–6.

  6. 6

    Archer C, Levy AR, McGregor M. Value of routine preoperative chest x-rays: a meta analysis. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 1022–7.

  7. 7

    Chung F, Mezei G, Tong D. Preexisting medical conditions as predictors of adverse events in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: A27.

  8. 8

    Cote CJ, Zaslavsky A, Downes JJ, et al. Postoperative apnea in former preterm infants after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 809–22.

  9. 9

    Smith I, White PF, Nathanson M, Gouldson R. Propofol: an update on its clinical use. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 1005–43.

  10. 10

    Burkle H, Dunbar S, Van Aken H. Remifentanil: a novel, short-acting u-opioid. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 646–51.

  11. 11

    Gold MI, Watkins DW, Sung YF, et al. Remifentanil versus remifentanil/midazolam for ambulatory surgery during monitored anesthesia care. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 51–7.

  12. 12

    Philip BK, Scuderi PE, Chung F, et al. Remifentanil compared with alfentanil for ambulatory surgery using intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 515–21.

  13. 13

    Twersky RS, Thompson D, Warner DS, et al. The incidence of nausea following a remifentanil-based anesthetic regimen. Anesth Analg 1998; 518.

  14. 14

    Baxter PJ, Kharasch ED. Rehydration of desiccated baralyme prevents carbon monoxide formation from desflurane in an anesthesia machine. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 1061–5.

  15. 15

    Dexter F, Tinker JH. Comparisons between desflurane and isoflurane or propofol on time to following commands and time to discharge. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 77–82.

  16. 16

    Bito H, Ikeuchi Y, Ikeda K. Effects of low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia on renal function. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 1231–7.

  17. 17

    Kharasch ED, Frink EJ, Zager R, et al. Assessment of low-flow sevoflurane and isoflurane effects on renal function using sensitive markers of tubular toxicity. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 1238–53.

  18. 18

    Sloan MH, Conrad PF, Karsunky Pk, Gross JB. Sevoflurane: induction and recovery characteristics with single-breath inhaled inductions of anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 528–32.

  19. 19

    Frink EJ, Malan FT, Atlas M, et al. Clinical comparison of sevoflurane and isoflurane in healthy patients. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 241–5.

  20. 20

    Wellborn LG, Hannallah RS, Norden JM, Ruttiman UE, Callan CM. Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 917–20.

  21. 21

    Jellish WS, Lien CA, Fontenot HJ, Hall R. The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients. Anesth Analg 1995; 82: 479–85.

  22. 22

    Smith I, Ding Y, White PF. Comparison of induction, maintenance and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane-N2O and propofol-sevoflurane-N2O with propofolisoflurane-N2O anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 253–9.

  23. 23

    Nathanson MH, Fredman B, Smith I, White P. Sevofluranevs desflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison of maintenance and recovery profiles. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 1186–90.

  24. 24

    Apfelbaum JL, Grasela TH, Walawander CA, et al. Bypassing the PACU — a new paradigm in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: A32.

  25. 25

    Song D, White PF, Johnson ER. Does EEG-BIS monitoring facilitate fast-tracking after ambulatory anesthesia? Anesthesiology 1997; 87: A31.

  26. 26

    Bell S, Hill N. Factors facilitating PACU bypass in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: A34.

  27. 27

    Twersky RS. Recovery and discharge of the ambulatory anesthesia patient. ASA Refresher Course #412, 1997; San Diego, California.

  28. 28

    McKenzie R, Lim Uy NT, Riley TJ, Hamilton DL. Droperidol/Ondansetron combination controls nausea and vomiting after tubal banding. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 1218–22.

  29. 29

    Steinbrook RA, Freiberger D, Gosnell JL, Brooks DC. Prophylactic antiemetics for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: ondansetron versus droperidol plus metoclopramide. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 1081–3.

  30. 30

    Cieslak GD, Watcha MF, Phillips MB, Pennant JH. The dose-response relation and cost effectiveness of granisetron for prophylaxis of pediatriac postoperative emesis. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 1076–85.

  31. 31

    Kovac AL, Scuderi PE, Boener TF, et al. Treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting with a single intravenous doses of dolasetron mesylate: a multicenter trial. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 546–52.

  32. 32

    Watcha NF, Smith I. Issues in cost containment. Cost effectiveness analysis of antiemetic therapy for ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anaesth 1994; 6: 370–7.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Rebecca S. Twersky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Twersky, R.S. Ambulatory surgery update. Can J Anaesth 45, R76 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03019209

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sevoflurane
  • Ondansetron
  • Remifentanil
  • Desflurane
  • Droperidol