Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Conditioning as sensitization

  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of sensitization has a long history in psychology, and on both empirical and logical grounds it has been argued that sensitization and conditioning denote different neurophysiological processes. Investigators have devised elaborate control procedures that purport to differentiate sensitized and conditioned responses. But, mainly on logical grounds, it is argued that there is no valid basis for considering sensitization and conditioning as separate processes. A theory of learning is proposed in which sensitization is the basic construct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Dufort, R. H. and Kimble, G. A.: Ready signals and the effect of interpolated UCS presentations in eyelid conditioning.J. Exp. Psychol. 56:1–7, 1958.

  2. Dykman, R. A.: Toward a theory of classical conditioning. In B. Maher (Ed.),Progress in Experimental Personality Research. Vol. II. New York and London: Academic Press, 1965.

  3. Dykman, R. A.: On the nature of classical conditioning. In C. C. Brown (Ed.),Methods in Psychophysiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1967; pp. 234–290.

  4. Dykman, R. A. and Gantt, W. H.: A comparative study of cardiac conditioned responses and motor conditioned responses in a controlled “stress” situation. (Abstract)Am. Psychol. 6:263, 1951.

  5. Dykman, R. A. and Gantt, W. H.: Cardiovascular conditioning in dogs and humans. In (W. H. Gantt),Physiological Bases of Psychiatry. Springfield, Ill., Charles C Thomas, Publisher, 1958; pp. 171–195.

  6. Dykman, R. A. and Gantt, W. H.: A case of experimental neurosis and recovery in relation to the orienting response.J. Psychol. 50:105–110, 1960.

  7. Dykman, R. A., Gantt, W. H. and Whitehom, J. C.: Conditioning as emotional sensitization and learning.Psychol. Monographs,70:15:422, 1–17, 1956.

  8. Eccles, J. C.:The Neurophysiological Basis of Mind. London and New York: Oxford University Press (Clarendon), 1953.

  9. Gantt, W. H.: Cardiovascular components of the conditioned reflex to pain, food, and other stimuli.Physiol. Rev.,40: (Part II): 266–291, 1960.

  10. Grant, D. A. and Dittmer, D. G.: A tactile generalization gradient for a pseudoconditional response.J. Exp. Psychol.,26:404–412, 1940.

  11. Harlow, H. F. and Toltzien, F.: Formation of pseudoconditioned responses on the cat.J. Gen. Psychol,23:367–375, 1940.

  12. Harris, J. D.: Forward conditioning, backward conditioning, and adaptation to the conditioned stimulus.J. Exp. Psychol.,28:491–502, 1941.

  13. Kimble, G. A.:Hilgard and Marquis Conditioning and Learning. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1961.

  14. Kimble, G. A., Mann, L. I. and Dufort, R. H.: Classical and instrumental eyelid conditioning.J. Exp. Psychol. 49:407–417, 1955.

  15. Kimble, D. P. and Ray, R. S.: Reflex habilitation and potentiations inRava pipiens. Animal Behav.,13:550–553, 1965.

  16. Kimmel, H. D.: Reflex “habituality” as a basis for differentiating between classical and instrumental conditioning.Cond. Reflex,8:10–27, 1973.

  17. Konorski, J.: On two types of conditional reflexes: general laws of association.Cond. Reflex,8:2–9, 1973.

  18. Kozak, K. and Westerman, R.: Basic patterns of plastic change in the mammalian nervous system.Soc. Exp. Biol.,20:509–544, 1966.

  19. May, M. A.: An interpretation of pseudoconditioning.Psychol. Rev.,56: 177–183, 1949.

  20. Morrell, F.: Effect of anodal polarization on the firing pattern of single cortical cells. In N. S. Kline (Ed.),Pavlovian Conference on Higher Nervous Activity, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 92:860-876, 1961.

  21. Mowrer, G. H.: On the dual nature of learning—A re-interpretation of “conditioning” and “problem solving.”Harvard Ed. Rev.,17:102–148, 1947.

  22. Mowrer, O. H.:Learning, Theory and Behavior. New York: Wiley, 1960.

  23. Newton, J. E. O. and Perez-Cruet, J.: Successive beat analysis of cardiovascular orienting and conditional responses.Cond. Reflex,2:37–55, 1967.

  24. Razran, G.:Mind in Evolution. New York: Haughton-Mifflin, 1971.

  25. Russinov, V. S.: An electrophysiological analysis of the connecting function in the presence of a dominant region area. AbstractCommunications XIX International Physiological Congress, Montreal, 1953; pp. 719–720.

  26. Schlosberg, H.: The relationship between success and the laws of conditioning.Psychol. Rev.,44:379–394, 1937.

  27. Schoenfeld, W. N.: Some old work for modern conditioning theory.Cond. Reflex,4:219–223, 1966.

  28. Switzer, S. A.: Backward conditioning of the lid reflex.J. Exp. Psychol.,13:76–97, 1930.

  29. Switzer, S. A.: Disinhibition of the conditional galvenic response.J. Gen. Psychol.,9:77–100, 1933.

  30. Ukhtomski, A. A.: The dominant as a factor in behavior.Collection of Works. Vol I. Leningrad: Leningrad State University Press, 1950.

  31. Water, W. F. and McDonald, D. C.: Effects of “below zero” habituation on spontaneous recovery and dishabituation of the orienting response.Psychophysiology,11:548–558, 1974.

  32. Wendt, G. R.: An analytical study of the conditional knee jerk.Arch. Psychol, 19: No. 123, 1930.

  33. Wickens, D. D. and Wickens, C. D.: Factors related to pseudoconditioning.J. Exp. Psychol.,31:518–526, 1942.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Roscoe A. Dykman.

Additional information

Research sponsored by a grant from the NICHD (HD-NS 09119).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dykman, R.A. Conditioning as sensitization. Integr. psych. behav. 11, 24–36 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03000535

Download citation