Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Digital photogrammetry based automatic measurement of sandstone roof of a mine

  • 124 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Automatic close range photogrammetric measurements are of immense importance for a hazardous industry like mining. Unfortunately, available stereomatching techniques fail for high resolution close range images due to the large variation of object depth. In this paper a diffraction grating based laser dot-matrix projector along with a CCD camera is used for automatic close range measurement of a textureless and featureless object like massive sand stone strata. Targeting of object’s surface with large number of laser dots simultaneously solved two major problems: identification of conjugate points and precise image co-ordinate measurement. Least squares based template matching is used for centroid location of images of laser dots which provided 0.03 (mean) pixels accuracy. Using analytical techniques, camera model of the projector was developed by placing it rigidly on the teleseope of a geodimeter Bundle adjustment procedure is adopted for accurate estimation of interior orientation parameters of the projector which resulted precise co-ordinates of the object space during a test scan by the developed system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Banda F A S (1994). A CCD based three dimensional imaging system for the generation of facial surface models. Ph.D thesis, University College London: 245 pages.

  2. Barnard S T and Thompson W B (1980). Disparity analysis of images. IEEE Transaction, Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,2(4):333–340.

  3. Beyer H A (1992). Geometric and radiometric analysis of a CCD-camera based photogrammetric close-range system. Ph.D. thesis, ETH, Zurich: 186 pages.

  4. Chapman D P, Deacon A T D and Hamid A (1994). HAZMAP: a remote digital measurement system for work in hazardous environments. Photogramm. Rec.,14(83):747–758.

  5. Clarke T A (1990). The use of optical triangulation for high speed acquisition of cross sections or profile of structures. Photogrammetric Record,13(76):523–532.

  6. Clarke T A and Katsimbris A (1994). The use of diode laser collimators for targeting 3-D objects. Int. Archives Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,30(5):47–55.

  7. Day T and Muller J P (1989). Digital elevation model production by stereomatching of SPOT image-pairs: a comparison of algorithms. Image and Vision Computing,7(2):95–101.

  8. El-Hakim S F (1985). A photogrammetric vision system for robots. Photogramm. Engg. and Remote Sensing,51(5):545–552.

  9. Ethrog U (1991). Rasterstereography and double rasterstereography; two methods for measuring fast dynamic changes in laboratory model surfaces. J. Photogramm. and Remote Sensing,46(5):269–282.

  10. Frobin W and Hierholzer E (1981). Rasterstereography: a photogrammetric method for measurement of body. Photogramm. Engg. and Remote Sensing,47(12):1717–1724.

  11. Fryer J and Brown D (1986). Lens distortion for close range photogrammetry. Photogramm. Engg. and Remote Sensing,52(1):51–58.

  12. Gruen A W (1985). Adaptive least squares correlation: a powerful image matching technique. South African J. Photogramm., Remote Sensing and Cartography,14(3):175–187.

  13. Gruen A (1994). Digital close range photogrammetry-progress through automation. Int. Arch. Photogramm. and Remote Sensing,30(5):122–135.

  14. Huang Y D and Harley I (1990). CCD-camera calibration without a control field. Close Range Photogrammetry Meets Machine Vision, SPIE,1395(2):1028–1034.

  15. Hurteau R, St-Amant M, laperriere Y, Chevrette G, and Piche A (1991). Optically guided LHD: a demonstration prototype. Proc. Int. Mine Mechanisation & Automation, Colorado School of Mines, USA: 6–11 to 6–20.

  16. Keran C M and Hendricks P A (1995). Automation and safety of mobile equipment. Engg. and Mining J.,196(2):30–33.

  17. Maerz N H, Franklin J A and Bennett C P (1990). Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry. Int. J. Rock Mechanics, Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts,27(5):329–345.

  18. Otto G P and Chau T K W (1980). A ‘regiongrowing’ algorithm for matching of terrain images. Image and Vision Computing,7(2):83–94.

  19. Pollard S B, Mayhew J E W and Frisby J P (1985). PMF: a stereo correspondence algorithm using a disparity gradient limit. Perception,14(4):449–470.

  20. Rudenauer H (1990). Geological structure measurement in a CAD environment. Int. Arch. Photogramm. and Remote Sensing,28(5):1142–1149.

  21. Saint-Marc P, Jezouin J L and Medioni G (1991). A versatile PC-based range finding system. IEEE transactions Robotics and Automation,7(2):250–256.

  22. Singh R (1996). CCD based active triangulation for automatic close range monitoring of rock movement, Ph.D. thesis, University College London: 217 pages.

  23. Singh A, Scoble M, Lizotte Y and Crowther G (1991). Characterisation of underground rock fragmentation. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,9:93–107.

  24. Trinder J C (1989). Precision of digital target location. Photogramm. Engg. and Remote Sensing,55(6):883–886.

  25. Trinder J C, Jansa J and Huang Y (1995). An assessment of the precision and accuracy of methods of digital target location. J. Photogramm. and Remote Sensing,50(2):12–20.

  26. Trucco E, Fisher R B and Fitzgibbon A W (1994). Direct calibration and data consistency in 3-D laser scanning. Proc. 5th British Machine Vision Con., E.R. Hancock (Editor), BMVA Press, (UK): 489–498.

  27. Wong K W and Ho W H (1986). Close-range mapping with solid state camera. Photogramm. Engg. and Remote Sensing,52(1):67–74.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Rajendra Singh.

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, R., Chapman, D.P. & Atkinson, K.B. Digital photogrammetry based automatic measurement of sandstone roof of a mine. Journ. Ind. Soc. Remote Sensing 25, 47–59 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02995418

Download citation

Keywords

  • Remote Sensing
  • Object Space
  • Conjugate Point
  • Close Range
  • Centroid Location