Comparisons of terrestrial and aquatic bioassays for oil-contaminated soil toxicity
- 190 Downloads
Petroleum products are widely used in various sections of industry and they are one of the most abundant sources of environmental contamination. These products are classified by their physico-chemical properties such as boiling point, density and viscosity. Oil contamination in the environment is primarily evaluated by measuring the chemical concentrations of petroleum products in the solid or water phase. The results of chemical analyses do not correspond directly with the harmful environmental effects of petroleum products on the soil flora and fauna, because the interactions between oil compounds and the production of their methabolites in soil are not measured in chemical assessments. These kinds of effects of complex chemical mixtures in soil can be estimated by bioassays. Therefore, ecotoxicological tests are important for estimating soil quality in the risk assessment of oil-contaminated soil sites.
The objective of this study was to examine the oil-contaminated soil site of a closed petrol station with both chemical and ecotoxicological methods. The goals of this study were to compare the sensitivity of the terrestrial and aquatic bioassays and to compare the toxicity responses of aquatic bioassays determined from three different extraction procedures. In addition, our aim was to characterise a cost-effective battery of bioassays that could be applied to a comparison of oil-contaminated soils. It was in our interest to investigate oil-contaminated soil with oil concentrations of 2500–12000 mg/kg and to find out the possible differences between terrestrial and aquatic toxicity tests.
Six soil samples from a closed petrol station were examined for toxicity with terrestrial and aquatic tests. Terrestrial tests includedEnchytraeus albidus survival and reproduction assays and seed germination assays using wheat, cress, lettuce, and red clover seeds and growth inhibition assays of onions. The toxicities of the water-extractable fractions of the soil samples obtained from three different extractions were tested with aquatic bioassays based on plants (onion and duckweed growth inhibition tests), microbes (luminescent bacteria test), and enzyme inhibition (reverse electron transport test, RET). Chemical analyses of the solid samples were carried out simultaneously. Results. Oil concentrations ranged from 2500 to 12000 mg/kg, BTEX varied from 300 to 2800 mg/kg, and fuel additives: MTBE and TAME from 0.0 1 to 260 mg/kg. Only the sample contain-ing 12000 mg/kg oil had a significant toxic impact on all test organisms. Soil samples with oil concentrations 2500–6200 mg/ kg had no or only slight adverse effects on the test organisms with one exception, theE. albidus reproduction test. TheE. albidus survival and reproduction tests were the most sensitive bioassays of the terrestrial tests, and the luminescent bacteria test of the aquatic tests.
KeywordsLeaching tests oil-contaminated soil phytotoxicity soil animals soil ecotoxicity soil eluates
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation (1985): Standard methods for water and wastewater treatment, 16th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington DC, pp 1067–1072Google Scholar
- CENATC 292. prEN12457 (1999): Characterization of waste — leaching — compliance test for leaching of granular waste materials. Determination of leaching of constituents from granular waste materials. European Committee for Standardisation. 23 ppGoogle Scholar
- CEN/TC 292. prEN13137 (1999): Characterization of waste — determination of total organic carbon (TOC) in waste, sludges and sediments. European Committee for Standardisation. N391, 23 ppGoogle Scholar
- Fiskesjö G (1997): Allium test for screening chemicals. In: Plants for environmental studies, Wang W (ed). CRC Lewis Publishers, New York, pp 307–334Google Scholar
- Huddleston RL, Meyers JD (1979): AIChE Symp Ser Water 75, 327–334Google Scholar
- ISO/WD 16387 (2000): Soil Quality — Effects of pollutants on Enchytraeidae(Enchytraeits sp.). Determination of effects on reproduction. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneve, 15 ppGoogle Scholar
- ISO SFS-EN 11348 (1999): Water quality — Determination of the inhibitory effect of water samples on the light emission ofVibrio fischeri (Luminescent bacteria test). — Part 3. Method using freeze-dried bacteria. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneve, 13 ppGoogle Scholar
- Joutti A, Schultz E, Tuukkanen E, Vaajasaari K (2000). Industrial waste leachates: toxicity detection with microbiotests and biochemical tests. In: Persoone G, Janssen C, De Coen W (Eds) New microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 347–355Google Scholar
- Linder G, Greene JC, Ratsch H, Nwosu J, Smith S, Wilborn D (1990): Seed germination and root elongation toxicity tests in hazardous waste site evaluation: Methods development and applications. In: Wang W, Gorsuch JW, Lower WR (Eds) Plants for Toxicity Assessment, Vol. 1 (ASTM STP 1115). American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia PA, pp 344–364Google Scholar
- NEN 7349 (1995): Leaching characteristic of solid earthy and stony building and waste materials. Leaching test. Determination of the leaching of inorganic components from granular materials with the cascade test. Delft: Nederlands Normalisatie-Instituut, 11 pp OECD (1984): OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals, no 207. Earthworm, Acute Toxicity TestGoogle Scholar
- OECD (1999): OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals,Lemna growth inhibition test — Draft, December 1999 Peterson SA, Greene JG, Miller WM (1990): Toxicological assessment of hazardous waste samples extracted with deionised water or sodium acetate (TCLP) leaching media. In: Friedman D. (Eds.) Waste Testing and Quality Assurance, Vol. 2 (ASTM STP 1062). American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia PA, pp 107–129Google Scholar
- Read H, Harkin JM, Gustavson KE (1998): Environmental applications with submitochondrial particles. In: Microscale Testing in Aquatic Toxicology. Wells PG, Lee K, Blaise C (Eds), CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 31–52Google Scholar
- Saterbak A, Toy RJ, Wong DCL, McMain BJ, Williams MP, Dorn PB, Brzuzy LP, Chai EY, Salanitro JP (1999): Ecotoxicological and analytical assessment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Environ Sci Technol 18, 1591–1607Google Scholar
- Saterbak A, Toy RJ, McMain BJ, Williams MP, Dorn PB (2000): Ecotoxicological and analytical assessment of effects of bioremediation on hydrocarbon-containing soils. Environ Sci Technol 19, 2643–2652Google Scholar
- Vaajasaari K, Ahtiainen, J, Nakari T, Dahlbo H (2000): Hazard assessment of the industrial waste leachibility: chemical characterization and biotesting by routine effluent tests. In: Persoone G, Janssen C, De Coen W (Eds.) New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring. Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 413–423Google Scholar