Background. The purpose of this study was to compare a very-high-flow injection-rate method (group A) and a conventional injection-rate method (group B) for visualization of upper abdominal arteries by multidetector helical computed tomography (MDHCT).Methods. The subjects were 240 patients suspected to have abdominal lesions. They were randomly assigned to group A (120 patients) and group B (120 patients). In group A, the bilateral medial cubital veins were punctured, and contrast medium was infused at a rate of 8.6–9.6ml/s. In group B, the unilateral medial cubital vein was punctured, and contrast medium was infused at a rate of 2.0–3.0ml/s. The quality of vascular visualization was graded as poor, good, or excellent by three radiologists.Results. All visualizations of the celiac trunk (CE) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) were graded as excellent in both group A and group B. Visualization grades of the subsegmental branches of the hepatic artery (HA), right gastric artery (RGA), cystic artery, dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA), and superior pancreaticoduodenal artery (SPDA) were good or excellent in 75% (paging method)/53.3% (three-dimensional method), 85%/30%, 77.7%/18.3%, 76.7%/28.3%, and 88.3%/42.5%, respectively, in group A, and 33.3%/ 11.7%, 46.7%/3.4%, 41.6%/5%, 55%/4.2%, and 72.5%/ 14.2%, respectively, in group B. The appearance rate of intrahepatic portal branches was 28.3% in group A and 66.7% in group B in the arterial dominant phase.Conclusion. Group A showed better visualization results than Group B in upper abdominal arteries according to MDHCT.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Chong M, Freeny PC, Schmiedl UP. Pancreatic arterial anatomy: depiction with dual-phase helical CT. Radiology 1998; 208: 537–42.
Sim JS, Choi BI, Han JK, Chung MJ, Chung JW, Park JH, et al. Helical CT anatomy of pancreatic arteries. Abdo Imaging 1996; 21: 517–21.
Murakami G, Hirata K, Takamura T, Mukaiya M, Hata F, Kitagawa S. Vascular anatomy of the pancreaticoduodenal region: a review. J Hepat Bil Panc Surg 1999; 6: 55–68.
Michels NA. Blood supply and anatomy of the upper abdominal organs. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1995. p. 236–47, 377–513.
Schoepf UJ, Becker C, Bring R, Hong C, Rust GF, Helmberger T, et al. Computed tomography of the abdomen with multidetector array CT. Radiologe 1999; 39: 652–61.
Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S, Okada A, Hori M, Narumi Y, et al. Pancreatic CT imaging: effects of different injection rates and doses of contrast material. Radiology 1999; 212: 219–25.
Zeman PK, Fox SH, Silverman PM, Davros WJ, Cater LM, Griego D, et al. Helical (spiral) CT of the abdomen. AJR 1993; 160: 719–25
Hollett MD, Jorgensen MJ, Jeffrey RB Jr. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual-phase helical CT Radiology 1995; 195: 359–61.
Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Atri M, Garcia P, Reinhold C. Comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas. AJR 1996; 167: 49–55.
About this article
Cite this article
Kimura, M., Shioyama, Y., Okumura, T. et al. Very-high-flow injection rate for upper abdominal CT angiography. J Gastroenterol 37, 106–111 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990111
- injection method
- high flow
- CT angiography