Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Comparison of parametric FBP and OS-EM reconstruction algorithm images for PET dynamic study

  • 115 Accesses

  • 11 Citations

Abstract

An ordered subsets expectation maximization (OS-EM) algorithm is used for image reconstruction to suppress image noise and to make non-negative value images. We have applied OS-EM to a digital brain phantom and to human brain18F-FDG PET kinetic studies to generate parametric images. A 45 min dynamic scan was performed starting injection of FDG with a 2 D PET scanner. The images were reconstructed with OS-EM (6 iterations, 16 subsets) and with filtered backprojection (FBP), and K1, k2 and k3 images were created by the Marquardt non-linear least squares method based on the 3-parameter kinetic model. Although the OS-EM activity images correlated fairly well with those obtained by FBP, the pixel correlations were poor for the k2 and k3 parametric images, but the plots were scattered along the line of identity and the mean values for K1, k2 and k3 obtained by OS-EM were almost equal to those by FBP. The kinetic fitting error for OS-EM was no smaller than that for FBP. The results suggest that OS-EM is not necessarily superior to FBP for creating parametric images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Shepp LA, Vardi Y. Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography.IEEE Trans Med Imag 1982; MI-1: 113–122.

  2. 2.

    Llacer J, Veklerov E, Baxter LR, Grafton ST, Griffeth LK, Hawkins RA, et al. Results of a clinical receiver operating characteristic study comparing filtered backprojection and maximum likelihood estimator images in FDG PET studies.J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 1198–1203.

  3. 3.

    Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data.IEEE Trans Med Imag 1994; 13: 601–609.

  4. 4.

    Sokoloff L, Reivich M, Kennedy C, Des Rosiers MH, Patlak CS, Pettigrew KD, et al. The [14C]deoxyglucose method for the measurement of local cerebral glucose utilization: theory, procedure, and normal values in the conscious and anesthetized albino rat.J Neurochem 1977; 28: 897–916.

  5. 5.

    Niels AL, Iida H, Kanno I. Parametric imaging in nuclear medicine.Ann Nucl Med 1995; 9: 167–170.

  6. 6.

    Ikoma Y, Toyama H, Yamada T, Uemura K, Kimura Y, Senda M, et al. Creation of a dynamic digital phantom and its application to a kinetic analysis.KAKU IGAKU (Jpn J Nucl Med) 1998; 35: 293–303.

  7. 7.

    Wilson DW, Tsui BMW. Noise properties of filtered-backprojection and ML-EM reconstruction emission tomographic images.IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1993; 40: 1198–1203.

  8. 8.

    Barrett HH, Wilson DW, Tsui BMW. Noise properties of the EM algorithm: I. Theory.Phys Med Biol 1994; 39: 833–846.

  9. 9.

    Wilson DW, Tsui BMW, Barrett HH. Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulation.Phys Med Biol 1994; 39: 847–871.

  10. 10.

    Snyder DL, Miller MI. The use of sieves to stabilize images produced with the EM algorithm for emission tomography.IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1985; 32: 3864–3872.

  11. 11.

    Taguchi A, Toyama H, Kimura Y, Senda M, Uchiyama A. Comparison of the number of parameters using nonlinear iteration methods for compartment model analysis with18F-FDG brain PET.KAKU IGAKU (Jpn J Nucl Med) 1997; 34: 25–34.

  12. 12.

    Kanno I, Iida H, Miura S, Yamamoto S, Amano M, Hirose Y, et al. Design concepts and preliminary performances of stationary-sampling whole-body high-resolution positron emission tomography: HEADTOME IV.KAKU IGAKU (Jpn J Nucl Med) 1989; 26: 477–485.

  13. 13.

    Iida H, Miura S, Kanno I, Murakami M, Takahashi K, Uemura K, et al. Design and evaluation of HEADTOME IV, A whole-body positron emission tomograph.,IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1989; NS-36: 1006–1010.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Keiichi Oda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oda, K., Toyama, H., Uemura, K. et al. Comparison of parametric FBP and OS-EM reconstruction algorithm images for PET dynamic study. Ann Nucl Med 15, 417–423 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02988345

Download citation

Key words

  • parametric image
  • filtered backprojection
  • ordered subsets expectation maximization
  • PET