Advertisement

Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 99–111 | Cite as

Small mammal trapping in tropical montane forests of the Upper Nilgiris, southern India: An evaluation of capture-recapture models in estimating abundance

  • Kartik ShankerEmail author
Articles

Abstract

Capture-mark-recapture was used to study small mammal populations in tropical montane forests in southern India. Eleven plots in six montane forest patches were sampled from February-October, 1994. Six species were captured, including four rodents and two shrews. PROGRAM CAPTURE was used to derive estimates of density of the most abundant species in the study area,Rattus rattus Linnaeus. The coefficient of variation of the density estimate was used as an index of precision. The coefficient of variation decreased exponentially with increasing capture probability and with an increase in trapping duration. The coefficient of variation and the capture probability were not correlated with estimates of density. The density estimate increased with trapping duration, as did trap mortality. The latter may have been due to the trend of increased mortality with recaptures of the same individual, which in turn may have been due to weight loss over consecutive captures. Estimates of density derived using four estimators were different for 2, 3, 4 and 5 days of trapping. The coefficient of variation was highest for the generalized removal estimate and lowest for Darroch’s estimate. The models and estimators could not be applied to more than one species, and for this species, only in select habitats in a few seasons. Therefore, models of density estimation developed for temperate areas may not be suitable for tropical habitats due to low densities of small mammals in these habitats.

Keywords

Capture probability coefficient of variation estimators Rattus rattus trap mortality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. August P V 1983 The role of habitat complexity and heterogeneity in structuring tropical mammal communities;Ecology 64 1495–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boonstra R and Boag P T 1992 Spring declines inMicrotus pennsylvanicus and the role of steroid hormones;J. Anim. Ecol. 61 339–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownie C and Pollock K H 1985 Analysis of multiple capture recapture data using band recovery methods;Biometrics 41 411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham K P and Overton W S 1969 A simulation study of live trapping and estimation of population size;Technical Report Number 14, Department of Statistics, Oregon University, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Carothers A D 1973 Capture Recapture methods applied to a population with known parameters;J. Anim. Ecol. 42 125–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandrasekhar-Rao A and Sunquist M E 1996 Ecology of small mammals in tropical forest habitats of southern India;J. Trop. Ecol. 12 561–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diffendorfer J E, Gaines M S and Holt R D 1995 Habitat fragmentation and movements of three small mammals (Sigmodon, Microtus, andPeromyscus);Ecology 76 827–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doonan T J and Slade N A 1995 Effects of supplemental food on population dynamics of cotton rats,Sigmodon hispidus;Ecology 76 814–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison J L 1969 The abundance and population density of mammals in Malayan lowland forests;Malay. Nat. J. 22 174–178Google Scholar
  10. Hilborn R, Redfield J A and Krebs C J 1976 On the reliability of enumeration for mark and recapture census of voles;Can. J. Zool. 54 1019–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iriarte J A, Contreras L C and Jaksic F M 1989 A long-term study of a small-mammal assemblage in the Central Chilean matorral;J. Mammal. 70 79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Isabirye-Basuta G and Kasenene J M 1987 Small rodent populations in selectively felled and mature tracts of Kibale Forest, Uganda;Biotropica 12 260–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson C H N 1933 On the true density of tsetse flies;J. Anim. Ecol. 2 204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewski B and Szymura L 1995 Weasel population response, home range and predation on rodents in a deciduous forest in Poland;Ecology 76 179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeffery S M 1977 Rodent ecology and land use in western Ghana;J. Appl. Ecol. 14 741–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jolly G M and Dickson J M 1983 The problem of unequal catchability in mark-recapture estimation of small mammal populations;Can. J. Zool. 61 922–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krebs C J 1966 Demographic changes in fluctuating populations ofMicrotus californicus;Ecol. Monogr. 36 239–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lebreton J D, Burnham K M, Clobert J and Anderson J R 1992 Modelling Survival and Testing Biological Hypothesis Using Marked Animals A Unified Approach with Case Studies;Ecol. Monogr. 62 67–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lincoln F C 1930 Calculating waterfowl abundances on the basis of banding returns;Circ. U.S. Depart. Agricul. 118 1–4Google Scholar
  20. Mares M A and Ernest K A 1995 Population and community ecology of small mammals in a gallery forest of central Brazil;J. Mammal. 76 750–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McMurry S T, Lochmiller R L, Boggs J F, Leslie D MJr and Engle D M 1994 Demographic profiles of cotton rats in a continuum of habitat types;J. Mammal. 75 50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meena V 1997Small mammal communities of Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary southern India; M S Thesis, Pondicherry University, PondicherryGoogle Scholar
  23. Meher-Homji V M 1984 Udhagamandalam (Ootacamund): A biogeographic perspective;Indian Geogr. J. 59 205–213Google Scholar
  24. Menkens G E Jr and Anderson S H 1988 Estimation of Small Mammal Population Size;Ecology 69 1952–1959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Minta S and Mangel M 1989 A simple population estimate based on simulation for capture recapture and capture resight data;Ecology 70 1738–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murua R, Meserve P L, Gonzalez L A and Jofre C 1987 The small mammal community of a Chilean temperate rain forest lack of evidence of competition between dominant species;J. Mammal. 68 729–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nichols J D, Noon B R, Stokes S L and Hines J E 1981 Remarks on the use of the capture recapture methodology in estimating avian population size;Studies Avian Biol. 6 121–136Google Scholar
  28. Nichols J D and Pollock K H 1983 Estimating taxonomic diversity, extinction rates and speciation rates from fossil data using capture recapture methods;Paleobiology 9 150–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nichols J D 1992 Capture-Recapture Models; using marked animals to study population dynamics;BioScience 42 94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Connell M A 1989 Population dynamics of neotropical small mammals in seasonal habitats;J. Mammal. 70 532–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Farrell M J, Kaufmann D W and Lundahl D W 1977 Use of live trapping with assessment line method for density estimation;J. Mammal. 58 575–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Otis D L, Burnham K P, White G C and Anderson D R 1978 Statistical Inference from Capture Data on Closed Animal Populations;Wildl. Monogr. 62Google Scholar
  33. Patterson B D, Meserve P L and Lang B K 1989 Distribution and Abundance of small mammals along an elevational transect in temperate rainforests of Chile;J. Mammal. 70 67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Petersen C J G 1896 The yearly immigration of young plaice into the Limfjord from the German sea;Danish Biol. Stand. 6 1–48.Google Scholar
  35. Pollock K H, Nichols J D, Brownie C and Hines J E 1990 Statistical Inference for Capture Recapture Experiments;Wildl. Monogr. 107Google Scholar
  36. Prakash I, Partap Singh and Saravanan A 1996 Small Mammalian Diversity on Abu Hill;Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. B62 95–104Google Scholar
  37. Schnabel Z E 1938 The estimation of the total fish population of a lake;Am. Math. Mon. 45 348–352Google Scholar
  38. Scott D E and Dueser R D 1992 Habitat use by the insular populations ofMus andPeromyscus. What is the role of competition ?;J. Anim. Ecol. 61 329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seber G A F 1982Estimation of animal abundance and related parameters (London: Griffin)Google Scholar
  40. Shanker K 1998Community ecology of small mammals in montane ecosystems of the Upper Nilgiris, southern India; Ph D Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  41. Shanker K and Sukumar R 1998 Community ecology and demography of small mammal populations in insular montane forests in southern India;Oecologia 116 243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shanker K and Sukumar R 1999 Synchrony in small mammal populations of montane forest patches of southern India;J. Anim. Ecol. 68 50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Siegel S and Castellan N JJr 1988Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company)Google Scholar
  44. Skalski J R 1985 Construction of cost functions for tag re-capture research;Wild. Soc. Bull. 13 273–283Google Scholar
  45. Slade N A and Iskjaer C 1990 Daily variation in body mass of free-living rodents and its significance for mass-based population dynamics;J. Mammal. 71 357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith M H, Gardner R H, Gentry J B, Kaufmann D W and O’ Farell M H 1975 Density estimations of small mammal populations; inSmall mammals: their productivity and population dynamics (eds) F B Golley, K Petrusewicz and L Ryszkowski (New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  47. Steen H, Ims R A and Sonerud G A 1996 Spatial and temporal patterns of small-rodent population dynamics at a regional scale;Ecology 77 2365–2372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stephenson P J 1993 The small mammal fauna of Reserve Speciale d’Annlamazaotra, Madagascar the effects of human disturbance on endemic species diversity;Biol. Cons. 2 603–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turner C L and Grant W E 1987 Effect ofSigmodon hispidus on microhabitat utilisation byBaiomys taylori andReithrodontomys fulvescens;J. Mammal. 68 80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White G C, Anderson D R, Burnham K P and Otis D L 1982Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations (Los Alamos, New Mexico: Los Alamos National Laboratory)Google Scholar
  51. Wileyto E P, Ewens W J and Mullen M A 1994 Markov-recapture population estimates: a tool for improving interpretation of trapping experiments;Ecology 75 1109–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wirminghaus J O and Perrin M R 1993 Seasonal changes in density, demography and body composition of small mammals in a southern temperate forest;J. Zool. London 229 303–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Ecological SciencesIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations