Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Breeding and establishing new trees resistant to disease

  • 58 Accesses

  • 3 Citations


While the vanished American chestnut has not yet been replaced by blight-resistant chestnuts, or white pines, elms and poplars saved from the ravages of other diseases, great advances have been made toward achieving these goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Aamodt, O. S. 1934. The relation between physiologic forms of phytopathogenic fungi and the problem of breeding for resistance to disease. 5th Pac. Sci. Congr., Proc.4: 2615–2625.

  2. Anon. 1944. Application of genetics to plant and animal breeding. Nature153: 780–783.

  3. — 1949. Disease-resistant Buisman elm available. Am. Nurseryman89(5): 30.

  4. Baker, W. L., and May, Curtis. 1951. Phloem necrosis of elm. Plants & Gardens7: 129–130.

  5. Baxter, D. V. 1951. Pathology in forest practice.

  6. Beattie, R. K. 1933. How the Dutch elm disease reached America. Nat. Shade Tree Conf., Proc. (1933)9: 101–105.

  7. — 1937. The Dutch elm disease in Europe. Am. For.43: 159–161. 201.

  8. Bier, J. E. 1939. Septoria canker of introduced and native hybrid poplars. Canad. Jour. Res. C17: 195–204.

  9. Blakeslee, A. F. 1945. Removing some of the barriers to crossability in plants. Am. Philos. Soc., Proc.89: 561–574.

  10. Blow, F. E. 1948. Hybrid poplar performance in tests in the Tennessee Valley. Jour. For.46: 493–499.

  11. Boyce, J. S. 1941. Exotic trees and disease. Jour. For.39: 907–913.

  12. -. 1948. Forest pathology. Ed. 2.

  13. Bretz, T. W., and Swingle, R. U. 1950. Propagation of disease-resistant elms. Am. Nurseryman92(4): 7–9, 65–66.

  14. Briggs, F. N. 1938. The use of the backcross in crop improvement. Am. Nat.72: 285–292.

  15. — 1942. Breeding disease-resistant crops. Science96: 60.

  16. Brink, R. A. 1949. A prospective view of forest-tree breeding in Wisconsin. Jour. For.47: 813–818.

  17. Brown, W. 1936. The physiology of hostparasite relations. Bot. Rev.2: 236–281.

  18. Bruman, A. J. 1938. Genetic aspects of plant introduction. An approach to the heredityenvironment problem in plants. Sci. Month.46: 120–131.

  19. Bull, H. 1939. Increased growth of loblolly pine as a result of cutting and girdling large hardwoods. Jour. For.37: 642–645.

  20. Burrage, C. H. 1939. New experimental planting project. Jour. For.37: 899–900.

  21. Butler, E. J. 1936. The nature of immunity from disease in plants. 3rd Int. Congr. Comp. Path. Vol.1 (Pt. 2): 1–15.

  22. Champion, H. G. 1945. Genetics and forestry. Quart. Jour. For.39: 74–81.

  23. Chapman, H. H. 1931. Forest management.

  24. Childs, T. W., and Bedwell, J. L. 1948. Susceptibility of some white pines toCronartium ribicola in the Pacific Northwest. Jour. For.46: 595–599.

  25. Clapper, R. B. 1943. New chestnuts for our forests? Am. For.49: 331–333, 365.

  26. — 1950. Breeding new chestnuts for southern forests. For. Farmer9(11): 8.

  27. — 1952. Relative blight resistance of some chestnut species and hybrids. Jour. Forestry50: 453–455.

  28. — and Miller, J. M. 1949. Breeding and selecting pest-resistant trees. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1949: 465–471.

  29. Day, W. R. 1949. Forest pathology in relation to land utilization. Emp. For. Rev.28: 110–116.

  30. De Beuzeville, W. A. W. 1943. The climatological basis of forestry. New South Wales For. Com. Bull.

  31. Deuber, C. G. 1942. The vegetative propagation of eastern white pine and other fiveneedled pines. Jour. Arn. Arb.23: 198–215.

  32. Dickson, J. G. 1934. The nature of immunity in plants. 5th Pac. Sci. Congr., Proc. Vol.4: 3211–3219.

  33. Diller, J. D. 1940. Asiatic chestnuts as forest trees. Am. For.46: 19–21, 48.

  34. — 1946. Growing chestnuts for timber. North. Nut Grow. Assoc., Ann. Rep.37: 66–70.

  35. -. 1950. The planting and care of blightresistant chestnuts for forest trees. U. S. Dept. Agr., For. Path., Spec. Rel.15.

  36. Division of Forestry and Forest Products, F.A.O. 1950. The forest crop of the future—quality or quantity? Unasylva4(2): 51–57.

  37. Doran, W. L. 1946. Vegetative propagation of white pine. Mass. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull.435.

  38. — and McKenzie, M. A. 1949. The vegetative propagation of a few species of elm. Jour. For.47: 810–812.

  39. Dorman, K. W. 1950. The genetics of southern pines. U. S. Dept. Agr., Southeast. For. Exp. Sta., Asheville, N. C.

  40. Duffield, J. W. 1942. The cytological basis of forest tree improvement. Jour. For.40: 859–864.

  41. — 1950. Techniques and possibilities for Douglas-fir breeding. Jour. For.48: 41–45.

  42. — and Stockwell, P. 1949. Pine breeding in the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1949: 147–153.

  43. Farrar, J. L., and Grace, N. H. 1942. Vegetative propagation of conifers. XII. Canad. Jour. Res. C20: 204–211.

  44. Frankel, O. H. 1950. The development and maintenance of superior genetic stocks. Heredity4(1): 89–102.

  45. Gaines, E. M. 1949. Soil factors related to the local determination of forest site quality. U. S. Dept. Agr., Southern For. Exp. Sta., New Orleans, La.

  46. Gevorkiantz, S. R., and Roe, E. I. 1935. Photoperiodism in forestry. Jour. For.33: 599–602.

  47. Gillett, C. A. 1950. Trees for America—everyone’s problem. Southern Lumberman180(2251): 40–42.

  48. Gravatt, G. F. 1949. Chestnut blight in Asia and North America. Unasylva3(1): 2–7.

  49. Graves, A. H. 1931. Forest pathology. Brook. Bot. Gard. Rec.20: 83–87.

  50. — 1938. Breeding trees for disease resistance. East. Shade Tree Conf., Proc.1938: 95–99.

  51. — 1947. Breeding chestnut trees. North. Nut Grow. Assoc., Ann. Rep.38: 85–91.

  52. — 1948. Forest-tree breeding. Econ. Bot.2: 284–305.

  53. — 1949. Breeding chestnuts for timber. Jour. N. Y. Bot. Gard.50: 248–254.

  54. — 1950. Bringing back the chestnut. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Frontiers of Plant Sci.2: 8.

  55. Hahn, G. G. 1949a. Evidence of the nonexistence of physiological races inCronartium ribicola. Phytopath.39: 85–87.

  56. — 1949b. Further evidence that immune ribes do not indicate physiologic races ofCronartium ribicola in North America. Plant Dis. Rep.33: 291–292.

  57. Hanson, H. C. 1949. The agroclimatic-analogue (homoclime) technique in plant introduction and distribution of new selections. Agron. Jour.41: 186–188.

  58. Hartley, C. 1939. The clonal variety for tree planting: asset or liability? Phytopath.29: 9. [Abst.]

  59. — 1950. Fungicides for forest trees, shade trees and forest products. Bot. Rev.16(1): 33–50.

  60. Hawley, R. C. 1946. The practice of silviculture. Ed. 5.

  61. Hayes, H. K. 1930. Inheritance of disease resistance in plants. Am. Nat.64: 15–36.

  62. - and Immer, F. R. 1942. Methods of plant breeding.

  63. Hepting, G. H. 1936. A destructive disease of the mimosa tree in the Carolinas. Plant Dis. Rep.20: 177–178.

  64. -Hepting, G. H. 1939. A vascular wilt of the mimosa tree (Albizzia julibrissin). U. S. Dept. Agr., Circ.535.

  65. -. 1940. Eastern forest tree diseases in relation to stand improvement. Fed. Sec. Agency. C.C.C., For. Pub. 2.

  66. — and Toole, E. R. 1942. Mimosa wilt—a major problem. Southern Shade Tree Conf. Proc. (1942) Vol.5: 254–258.

  67. Hirt, R. R. 1940. Relative susceptibility toCronartium ribicola of 5-needled pines planted in the East. Jour. For.38: 932–937.

  68. — 1948. Evidence of resistance to blister rust by eastern white pine growing in the Northeast, Jour. For.46: 911–913.

  69. Hopkins. A. D. 1938. Bioclimatics, a science of life and climate relations. U. S. Dept. Agr. Misc. Pub.280.

  70. Huberman, M. A. 1941. Why phenology? Jour. For.39: 1007–1013.

  71. Hudson, P. S. 1937. Genetics in its application to plant breeding. Biol. Rev.12: 285–319.

  72. Hutchinson, J. B. 1940. The application of genetics to plant breeding. I. The genetic interpretation of plant breeding problems. Jour. Genet.40: 271–282.

  73. et al. 1937. The genetics ofGossypium and its application to cotton breeding. Ind. Cent. Cotton Com., 1st Conf. Sci. Res. Workers on Cotton in India, Paper8: 296–312.

  74. Jemison. G. M. and Hepting, G. H. 1949. Timber stand improvement in the Southern Appalachian Region. U. S. Dept. Agr., Misc. Pub.693.

  75. Johnson, L. P. V. 1939a. The breeding of forest trees. For. Chron.15: 139–151.

  76. — 1939b. A descriptive list of natural and artificial interspecific hybrids in North American forest-tree genera. Canad. Jour. Res. C17: 411–444.

  77. — 1945. Reduced vigor, chlorophyll deficiency, and other effects of self-fertilization inPinus. Canad. Jour. Res. C23: 145–149.

  78. Kains, M. G., and McQuesten, L. M. 1942. Propagation of plants.

  79. Kelley, A. P. 1948. Further studies on the continued growth of American chestnut. Landenburg Laboratory, Landenburg, Pa. Also Rev. Appl. Myc.28: 200. 1949.

  80. Knight, R. L. 1948. The role of major genes in the evolution of economic characters. Jour. Genet.48: 370–387.

  81. Kostoff, D. 1934. Inheritance of natural immunity in plants with special reference to breeding of immune varieties. Zeits. Zucht. A. Pflanzenzucht.19: 550–576.

  82. Lewis, D. 1949. Incompatibility in flowering plants. Biol. Rev.24: 472–496.

  83. Liming, O. N.et al. 1949. Dutch elm disease control conference report—1949. Trees9(4): 6–7, 15, 18–19, 21.

  84. Lindquist, B. 1948. Genetics in Swedish forestry practice.

  85. Lutz,H. J., and Chandler, R. F., Jr. 1946. Forest soils.

  86. Martin, J. F., and Spaulding, P. 1949. Blister rust on white pine. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1949: 453–458.

  87. Matthews, D. M. 1935. Management of American forests.

  88. May, C. 1930. The Dutch elm disease. Nat. Shade Tree Conf., Proc. (1930)6: 91–94.

  89. -. 1934. Outbreaks of the Dutch elm disease in the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr., Circ.322.

  90. — 1947. Introduced epidemic shade and forest tree diseases. Arb. News12: 25–31.

  91. — and Collins, C. W. 1938. The Dutch elm disease in the United States and its insect vectors. West. Shade Tree Conf., Proc. (1938) Vol.5: 49–54.

  92. McKay, J. W. 1950. Three new Chinese chestnut varieties promise home grown chestnuts. Hort.28: 224, 245.

  93. Mielke, J. L. 1943. White pine blister rust in western North America. Yale Univ. School of For., Bull.52.

  94. Minckler, L. S. 1945. Tree planting: principles and practices. Southern Lumberman171(sn2153): 114–116.

  95. -Minckler, L. S and Chapman, A. G. 1948. Tree planting in the Central, Piedmont, and Southern Appalachian regions. U. S. Dept. Agr., Farm Bull. 1994.

  96. Mirov, N. T. 1938. Vegetative propagation of white pine as a possible method of blister rust control. Jour. For.36: 807–808.

  97. — 1940a. Forest genetics: present status and outlook for the future. 6th Pac. Sci. Congr., Proc. Vol.4: 727–730.

  98. — 1940b. Tested methods of grafting pines. Jour. For.38: 768–777.

  99. — 1944. Experiments in rooting pines in California. Jour. For.42: 199–204.

  100. Mitchell, J. W., and Rice, R. R. 1942. Plantgrowth regulators. U. S. Dept. Agr., Misc. Pub.495.

  101. Nagel, C. M. 1949. Leaf rust resistance within certain species and hybrids ofPopulus. Phytopath.39: 16. [Abst.]

  102. Nuttonson, M. Y. 1949. Agricultural climatology of Japan and its agro-climatic analogues in North America. Am. Inst. Crop Ecol., Int. Agro-climatol. Ser. Study No. 9.

  103. -. 1950. Agricultural climatology of Siberia, natural belts, and its agro-climatic ana-logues in North America. Am. Inst. Crop Ecol., Int. Agro-climatol. Ser. Study No. 13.

  104. Patel, S. J. 1938. Advantages and disadvantages of the backcross method in plant breeding. Ind. Cent. Cotton Com., 1st Conf. Sci. Res. Workers on Cotton in India, Paper No. 2: 341–345.

  105. Pauley, S. S. 1949. Forest-tree genetics research:Populus L. Econ. Bot.3: 299–330.

  106. Pavari, A. 1949. Chestnut blight in Europe. Unasylva3(1): 8–13.

  107. Pearson, G. A. 1944. Applied genetics in forestry. Sci. Month.58: 444–153.

  108. Proscott, J. A., and Lane-Poole, C. E. 1946. The climatology of the introduction of pines of the Mediterranean environment to Australia. Trans. Royal Soc. South. Austr.71: 67–90.

  109. Roddick, D. 1943. Development of blightimmune varieties. Am. Pot. Jour.20: 118–126.

  110. Reddick, D.et al. 1940. Report of the Committee on Technical Words. Phytopath.30: 361–368.

  111. Reed, C. A. 1947. The 1946 status of Chinese chestnut growing in the eastern United States. Nat. Hort.26: 83–93.

  112. — 1950. Chinese chestnut varieties. Am. Nurseryman91(2): 7–8, 66–69.

  113. Richens, R. H. 1945. Forest tree breeding and genetics. Imp. Bur. Plant Breed. & Genet., Jt. Pub. S.

  114. Righter, F. I. 1946. New perspectives in forest tree breeding. Science104: 1–3.

  115. Riker, A. J. 1945. Some possibilities for developing resistance to disease in trees. Am. Nurseryman81(12): 5–7.

  116. — and Kouba, T. F. 1940. White pine selected in blister-rust areas. Phytopath.30: 20. [Abst.]

  117. et al. 1943. White pine selections tested for resistance to blister rust. Jour. For.41: 753–760.

  118. Roberts, R. H. 1949. Theoretical aspects of graftage. Bot. Rev.15: 423–463.

  119. Rudolf. P. O. 1948. Hybrid poplar planting in the Lake States. Lake States For. Exp. Sta., Paper 14.

  120. Salaman, R. N. 1936. Immunity to virus diseases in plants. 3rd Int. Congr. Comp. Path. Vol.1 (Pt. 2): 167–178.

  121. Sand, N. H., and Bryan, M. M. 1947. Managing the small forest. U. S. Dept. Agr., Farm. Bull. 1989.

  122. Schreiner, E. J. 1937. Improvement in forest trees. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1937: 1242–1279.

  123. — 1938. Creative forestry. Paper Ind. } Paper World20: 302–307.

  124. — 1939a. The possibilities of the clone in forestry. Jour. For.37: 61–62.

  125. — 1939b. Some ecological aspects of forest genetics. Jour. For.37: 462–464.

  126. — 1949. Poplars can be bred to order. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1949: 153–157.

  127. — 1950. Genetics in relation to forestry. Jour. For.48: 33–38.

  128. Smith, E. C., and Nichols, C., Jr. 1941. Species hybrids in forest trees. Jour. Arn. Arb.22: 443–454.

  129. Smucker, S. J. 1944. Rebuilding the American elm. Am. For.50: 104–107, 137–138.

  130. Snell, W. H. 1931. The Kelm Mountain blister-rust infestation. Phytopath.21: 919–921.

  131. Snow, A. G., Jr. 1940. Rooting white pine cuttings. Northeast. For. Exp. Sta., Occ. Paper 11.

  132. — and Duffield, J. W. 1940. Genetics in forestry. Jour. For.38: 404–408.

  133. Stakman, E. C. 1947. Plant diseases are shifty enemies. Am. Sci. (Summer Issue)35: 321–350.

  134. Stebbins, G. L., Jr. 1949. Reality and efficacy of selection in plants. Am. Philos. Soc., Proc.93: 501–513.

  135. Stevens, N. E. 1948. Disease damage in clonal and self-pollinated crops. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.40: 841–844.

  136. Stockwell, P., and Righter, F. I. 1947. Hybrid forest trees. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1943-1947: 465–472.

  137. Stoeckeler, J. H. 1950. Bigger and better forest trees for Sweden. Sci. Month.70: 328–332.

  138. Stone, E. C., and Duffield, J. W. 1950. Hybrids of sugar pine by embryo culture. Jour. For.48: 200–201.

  139. Stout, A. B.et al. 1927. The breeding of forest trees for pulpwood. Jour. N. Y. Bot. Gard.28: 49–63.

  140. — and Schreiner, E. J. 1933. Results of a project in hybridizing poplars. Jour. Hered.24: 217–229.

  141. Swingle, R. U. 1938. A phloem necrosis of elm. Phytopath.28: 757–759.

  142. -Swingle, R. U. 1942. Phloem necrosis, a virus disease of the American elm. U. S. Dept. Agr., Circ. 640.

  143. — 1945. Another enemy flanks the elm. Am. For.51: 334–335.

  144. — 1950a. Report on research on the Dutch elm disease. Arb. News15: 113–114.

  145. — 1950b. Report on research on the Dutch elm disease. Nat. Shade Tree Conf., Proc.26: 38–44.

  146. - and Whitten, R. R. 1950. Dutch elm disease. Soc. Am. For., Tree Pest Leaflet23.

  147. et al. 1949. Dutch elm disease. U. S. Dept. Agr., Yearbook1949: 451–452.

  148. -et al. 1949. The identification and control of elm phloem necrosis and Dutch elm disease. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Spec. Circ.80.

  149. Syrach-Larsen, C. 1947. Estimation of the genotype in forest trees. Royal Vet. Agr. Coll., Yearbook1947: 87–128.

  150. Thimann, K. V., and Behnke-Rogers, James. 1950. The use of auxins in the rooting of woody cuttings. Maria Moors Cabot Found.1.

  151. Thomas, J. E., and Riker, A. J. 1950. Progress on rooting cuttings of white pine. Jour. For.48(7): 474–480.

  152. Toole, E. R., 1941. Fusarium wilt of the mimosa tree (Albizzia julibrissin). Phytopath.31: 599–616.

  153. — 1948a. Distribution of mimosa wilt in 1947. Plant Dis. Rep.32: 67.

  154. — 1948b. Rootability of cuttings. Am. Nurseryman88(2): 72.

  155. — 1949. Selection and propagation of wilt-resistant mimosa trees. Trees9(4): 10, 12, 16.

  156. — 1950. Disease resistant mimosa trees. Am. For.56(9): 28. 40.

  157. — and Hepting, G. H. 1949. Selection and propagation ofAlbizzia for resistance to Fusarium wilt. Phytopath.39: 63–70.

  158. Ulm, A. 1948a. Remember the chestnut! Am. For.54: 156–159, 190, 192.

  159. — 1948b. The Chinese chestnut makes good. Am. For.54: 491, 518, 520. 522.

  160. Van Fleet, W. 1914. Chestnut breeding experience. Jour. Hered.5: 19–25.

  161. — 1920. Chestnut work at Bell experiment plot. North. Nut Grow. Assoc., Ann. Rep.11: 16–21.

  162. Walker, J. C. 1941. Disease resistance in the vegetable crops. Bot. Rev.7: 458–506.

  163. Walter, J. M.et al. 1943. Dutch elm disease and its control. U. S. Dept. Agr., Circ.677.

  164. Waterman, A. M. 1946. Canker of hybrid poplar clones in the United States, caused bySeptoria musiva. Phytopath.36: 148–156.

  165. — and Cash, E. K. 1950. Leaf blotch of poplar caused by a new species ofSeptotinia. Mycol.42: 374–384.

  166. Wenholz, H. 1934. Breeding [of plants] for disease resistance. 5th Pac. Sci. Congr., Proc.4: 2579–2583.

  167. Went, F. W. 1950. The response of plants to climate. Science112: 489–494.

  168. Wilde, S. A. 1946. Forest soils and forest growth.

  169. Wingard, S. A. 1941. The nature of disease resistance in plants. I. Bot. Rev.7: 59–109.

  170. Wright, J. W. 1949. Producing elm seeds on cut branches. Jour. For.47: 210–214.

  171. Wyckoff, S. N.et al. 1947. Protection against forest insects and diseases in the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr., For. Serv. Reappraisal Rep5.

  172. Yarnell, S. 1942. Influence of the environment on the expression of hereditary factors in relation to plant breeding. Science96: 505–508.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Russell B. Clapper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clapper, R.B. Breeding and establishing new trees resistant to disease. Econ Bot 6, 271–293 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985070

Download citation


  • Poplar
  • Economic Botany
  • Parent Tree
  • Shade Tree
  • American Chestnut