Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Explicit motion of dynamic systems with position constraints

  • 63 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Although many methodologies exist for determining the constrained equations of motion, most of these methods depend on numerical approaches such as the Lagrange multiplier’s method expressed in differential/algebraic systems. In 1992, Udwadia and Kalaba proposed explicit equations of motion for constrained systems based on Gauss’s principle and elementary linear algebra without any multipliers or complicated intermediate processes. The generalized inverse method was the first work to present explicit equations of motion for constrained systems. However, numerical integration results of the equation of motion gradually veer away from the constraint equations with time. Thus, an objective of this study is to provide a numerical integration scheme, which modifies the generalized inverse method to reduce the errors. The modified equations of motion for constrained systems include the position constraints of index 3 systems and their first derivatives with respect to time in addition to their second derivatives with respect to time. The effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated by numerical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Appell, P., 1911, “Example De Mouvement D’un Point Assujetti A Une Liaison ExprimeePar Une Relation Non Lineaire Entre Les Composantes DeLa Vitesse,”Rend. Circ. Matem. Palermo., 32, pp. 48–50.

  2. Baumgarte, J. W., 1972, “Stabilization of Constraints and Integrals of Motion in Dynamical Systems,”Comp. Meth. in Appl. Mech. and Engineering, 1, pp. 1–16.

  3. Gear, C. W. and Petzold, L. R., 1984, “ODE Methods for The Solution of Differential/Algebraic Systems. ”SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 21, pp. 716–728.

  4. Gear, C. W., Leimkuhler B. and Gupta G. K., 1985, “Automatic Integration of Euler-Lagrange Equations with Constraints,”J. Comput. Appl. Math., 12 & 13, pp. 77–90.

  5. Gear, C. W., 1986, “Maintaining Solution Invariants in The Numerical Solution of ODEs,”SIAM J. Sci. Slat. Comput., 7, pp. 734–743.

  6. Gear, C. W., 1988, “Differential-Algebraic Equation Index Transformations,”SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Compta., 9, pp. 39–47.

  7. Gibbs, J. W., 1879, “On the Fundamental Formulae of Dynamics. ”American Journal of Mathematics, 2, pp. 49–64.

  8. Kane, T. R., 1983, “Formulation of Dynamical Equations of Motion,”Am. J. Phvs. 51, pp. 974–977.

  9. Park, J. H., Yoo, H. H. and Hwang, Y., 2000, “Computational Method for Dynamic Analysis of Constrained Mechanical Systems Using Partial Velocity Matrix Transformation,”KSME International Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 159–167.

  10. Park, J. H., Yoo, H. H., Hwang, Y. and Bae, D. S., 1997, “Dynamic Analysis of Constrained Multibody Systems Using Kane’s Method,”Transaction of the KSME, Vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 2156–2164.

  11. Passerello, C. E. and Huston, R. L., 1973, “Another Look at Nonholonomic Systems,”ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, pp. 101–104.

  12. Udwadia, F. E. and Kalaba, R. E., 1992, “A New Perspective on Constrained Motion,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 439, pp. 407–410.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Hee Chang Eun or Keun-Hyuk Yang or Heon-Soo Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eun, H.C., Yang, K. & Chung, H. Explicit motion of dynamic systems with position constraints. KSME International Journal 17, 538 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02984455

Download citation

Key words

  • Generalized Inverse
  • Numerical Integration
  • Numerical Error
  • Position Constraint