This paper aims at demonstrating the feasibility of active control of beams with a multiobjective state-feedback control technique. The multiobjective state-feedback controller is designed on a linear matrix inequality (LMI) approach for the multiobjective synthesis. The design objectives are to achieve a mix ofH ∞ performance andH 2 performance satisfying constraints on the closed-loop pole locations in the face of model uncertainties. The controller is also designed to reject the effects of the noise and external of disturbances. For the theoretical analysis, the governing equation of motion is derived by Hamilton’s principle to describe the dynamics of a smart structural system. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the integrated robust controller in damping out the multiple vibration modes of the piezo/beam system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Bailey, T. and Hubbard, J., 1985, “Distributed Piezoelectric Polymer Active Vibration Control of a Cantilever Beam,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamicsi Vol. 8, pp. 605–610.
Bernstein, D. S. and Haddad, W. M., “LQG Control with an Performance Bound: A Riccati Equation Approach,”IEEE Trans, on Automatic Control, Vol. 34(3), pp. 293–305.
Boyd, S., Ghaoui, L., Feron, E. and Balakrishnan, V., 1994Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, S1AM.
Chilali, M. and Gahinet, P., 1996, “Desgin with Pole Placement Constraints: An LMI Approach,”IEEE Trans on Automatic Control, Vol. 41 (3), pp. 358–369.
Fanson, J. L. and Caughey, T. K., 1990, “Positive Position Feedback Control for Large Space Structures,”AIAA Journal, Vol. 28 (4), pp. 717–724.
Gahinet, P. and Apkarian, P., 1994, “A Linear Matrix Inequality Approach to Control,”Int. J. of Robust and Nonlinear Control, Vol. 4, pp. 421–448.
Gahinet. P., Nemirovski. L. and Chilali, M., 1995,The LMI Control Toolbox, Math works. Inc. IEEE. 1987,IEEE standard on piezoelectricity, IEEE Std. 176–1987.
Khargonekar, P., Petersen, I. and Rotea, M., 1998, “H∞-Optimal Control with State-Feedback,”IEEE Trans on Automatic Control, Vol. 33, No. 8, pp. 786–788.
Kim, J. and Nam, C, 1996, “H∞ Control for Flutter Suppression of a Laminated Plate with Self-Sensing Actuators,”KSME Journal, Vol. 10 (2), pp. 169–179 in Korean.
Meirovitch, L., 1967,Analytical Methods in Vibrations, London: Macmillan.
Ogata, K., 1990,Modern Control Engineering, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Petersen, I. R. 1987. “Disturbance Attenuation and Optimization: A Design Method Based on the Algebraic Riccati Equation,”IEEE Trans on Automatic Control, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 427–429.
Rao, S. S., 1995,Mechanical Vibrations, Addison Wesley.
Scherer, C., Gahinet, P. and Chilali, M., 1997, “Multiobjective Output-Feedback Control via LMI Optimization,”IEEE Trans on Automatic Control, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 896–911.
Shin, J., Hong, J., Park, S. and Oh, J., 1998, “Active Vibration Control of Flexible Cantilever Beam Using Piezo Actuator and FilteredX LMS Algorithm.”KSME International Journal, Vol. 12. No. 4, pp. 665–671.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, C.H., Hong, S.I. & Park, H.C. Analytical development of a robust controller for smart structural systems. J Mech Sci Technol 19, 1138–1147 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02984036
- Linear Matrix Inequality
- Multiobjective State-feedback Control
- Robust Control
- Smart Structure System