Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 94–100 | Cite as

Teachers’ self-examination of their understanding of the nature of science: A history and philosophy course responsive to science teachers’ needs

  • George E. O’Brien
  • Williard W. Korth
Article

Keywords

Science Teaching Science Teacher Science Curriculum Elementary School Teacher Science Teacher Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. S., Fleming, R. W. (1987). High school graduates’ beliefs about science-technology-society. I. methods and issues in monitoring student views.Science Education, 71, 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrentine, C. D. (1986). Science education: education in or about science?Science Education, 70, 497–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bybee, R. W. (1986). The sisyphean question in science education: What Should the scientifically and technologically literate person know, value, and do-as a citizen? in R. W. Bybee, (Ed.),Science technology society (1985 NSTA yearbook, pp. 79–93). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar
  4. Collette, A. T., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1989).Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools, 2nd edition. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
  5. Cooley, W. W., & Klopfer, L. E. (1962).Test on understanding science (TOUS). A research instrument to measure high school students’ understanding of science and scientists. Unpublished manual for administering, scoring, and interpreting scores.Google Scholar
  6. Cotham, J., & Smith E. (1981). Development and validation of the concepts of scientific theories test.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fraser, B. J. (1981).TOSRA test of science -related attitudes. Hawthorne, Victoria Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research Limited.Google Scholar
  8. Glidden, J., & Kurfiss, J. G. (1990). Small-group discussion in philosophy 101.College Teaching, 38, 3–8.Google Scholar
  9. Hoffmaster, S. (1986). Pseudoscience-teaching by counterexample.Journal of College Science Teaching, 16, 432–436.Google Scholar
  10. Hurd, P. D. (1969).New directions in teaching secondary school science. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
  11. Hurd, P. D. (1984).Reforming science education: The search for a new vision. Washington, DC: Council of Basic Education.Google Scholar
  12. Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1981).Handbook in research and evaluation, 2nd edition. San Diego, CA: EdiTS Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1980).Models of teaching, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Kimball, M. E. (9165).Opinions of scientists and science teachers about science. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  15. Klopfer, L. E. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klopfer, L., & Cooley, W. W. (1963). The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1, 33–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Korth, W. W. (1968)The use of the history of science to promote student understanding of the social aspects of science. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  18. Lederman, N. G. (1986a). Relating teaching behavior and classroom climate to changes in students’ conceptions of the nature of science.Science Education, 70, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lederman, N. G. (1986b). Students’ and teachers’ understanding of the nature of science: A reassessment.School Science and Mathematics, 86, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1986). Science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: Do they influence teaching behavior?Science Education, 71, 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller, J. (1986, February).Technological literacy some concepts and measures. Paper presented at the First National Science Technology Society Conference, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  22. Minstrell, J. A. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. B. Resnick, & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.),Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (1989 ASCD Yearbook, pp. 129–149). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  23. The National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1986).Science objectives 1985–86 assessment. (Objectives Booklet No 17-S-10). Princeton, NJ: Author.Google Scholar
  24. National Science Teachers Association. (1982).Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980’s. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  25. Rubba, P. A. (1976).Nature of scientific knowledge scale. Unpublished document. Bloomington, IN: School of Education, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  26. Rubba, P., & Andersen, H. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge.Science Education, 62, 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scientific literacy. (1983).Daedalus, 112, Spring.Google Scholar
  28. Shen, B. (1975). Science literacy: The public need.The Sciences, 24.Google Scholar
  29. Showalter, V. M. (1974). What is unified science education? Program objective and scientific literacy.Prism II, 2,3–4.Google Scholar
  30. Wheatley, J. (1986). The use of case studies in the science classroom.Journal of College Science Teaching, 16, 428–431.Google Scholar
  31. Zeidler, D. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1989). The effect of teachers’ language on students’ conceptions of the nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 771–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association for the Education of Teachers in Science 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • George E. O’Brien
    • 1
  • Williard W. Korth
    • 2
  1. 1.Science EducationFlorida International UniversityMiami
  2. 2.University of PittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations