Indicators which reflect environmental, economic, health and safety issues, have been categorized as microecometrics and macroecometrics. The former, generally flow based measures, have been developed for local, firm-wide or product based assessments. Microecometrics include materials intensity, energy consumption and emissions data, often from life cycle perspectives. They are, generally, intensive and are scaled with respect to unit of production, GDP or per capita, though other normalization factors have been proposed. In contrast macroecometrics tend to be extensive and represent global conditions such as temperatures and environmental concentrations. Ecometrics are subjective and reflect the dominant value of the individual, family unit, stakeholder group or firm. As such overaggregating or reducing the number of ecometrics for given applications, such as the rating of investments or access to credit, presents potential conflicts. Furthermore, while eco-indicators used for internal corporate reporting should not, necessarily, be validated, those microecometrics which involve external reporting, or multiple stakeholders, are arbitrary if not derived from, or based on, comprehensive life cycle approaches.
This paper summarizes ECOMETRICS’98, a workshop held in Lausanne, Switzerland in January 19–20, 1998. It discusses ecometric needs of various users including consumers, designers, private sector decision makers as well as politicians and policy makers. A discussion regarding appropriate microecometrics for industrial sectors including chemical, pharmaceutical, insurance, finance, electronics, manufacturing and consumer products is also summarized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Hunkeler, D.: How Can We Measure the Environment: The Conflict between Sustainable Development, Ecometrics and Family Values. Total Quality Environmental Management, in press
Lehni, M.: State-of-Play Report of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development’s Project on Eco-Efficiency Metrics and Reporting. Geneva, Switzerland, 1998
Allenby, B.;Yasui, I.;Lehni, M.;Züst, R.;Hunkeler, D.: Ecometrics’ Stakeholder Subjectivity. Int. J. LCA, in press
Weidenhaupt, A.;Hungerbuhler, K.: Integrated Product Design in Chemical Industry. A Plea for Adequate Life-Cycle Screening Indicators. Chimia 51, 217 (1997)
ISO/DIS 14020, “Environmental Labels and Declarations: General Principles, Draft International Standard„, ISO/TC 207/ SC 3, 1997
ISO/DIS 14024 “Environmental Labels and Declarations: Environmental Labeling Type I-Guiding Principles and Procedures”, 1997
SETAC, “A Technical Framework for Life-Cycle Assessment”, Pensacola, FL, 1991
Hunkeler, D. (Ed.): ECOMETRICS’98 Workshop Summary. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, April 22, 1998
Lutherbachkr, U.: Political and Policy Needs. ECOMETRICS’98 Workshop Summary, Hunkeler, D., (Ed.) Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland, April 22, 1998
Clift., R.: Microecometric Needs. ECOMETRICS’98 Workshop Summary, Hunkeler, D., (Ed.) Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland, April 22, 1998
Biswas, G.: Electronics and Manufacturing. ECOMETRICS’98 Workshop Summary, Hunkeler, D. (Ed.) Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland, April 22, 1998
About this article
Cite this article
Biswas, G., Clift, R., Davis, G. et al. Ecometrics. Int. J. LCA 3, 184–190 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02977566
- Life Cycle Assessment
- Life Cycle Management
- Sustainable Development