Advertisement

Journal of Phase Equilibria

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 643–647 | Cite as

The Co-Hg (cobalt-mercury) system

  • C. Guminski
Section II: Phase Diagram Evaluations

Keywords

Equi Diagram Crys Structure Phase Diagram Evaluation Regular Solution Model Intermetallic Compound Formation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Cited References

  1. 1896Nag:.
    H. Nagaoka, “On Diluted Ferromagnetic Amalgam,”Ann. Phys. Chem., 59,66–83 (1896) in German. (Equi Diagram, Magnetism; Experimental)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 27Tam:.
    G. Tammann and K. Kollmann, “Solubility of Iron Group Metals and Cu in Hg,”Z Anorg. Chem., 160,242–248(1927) in German. (Equi Diagram; Experimental)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 30Tam:.
    G. Tammann and W. Oelsen, “Dependence of Concentration of Saturated Mixed Crystals on Temperature,”Z. Anorg. Chem., 186, 257–288 (1930) in German. (Equi Diagram; Experimental)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 32Irv:.
    N.M. Irvin and A.S. Russell, “The Solubility of Cu, Mn and Some Sparingly Soluble Metals in Hg,”J. Chem. Soc., 891–898 (1932). (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  5. 39Bat:.
    L.F. Bates and W.P. Fletcher, “Electrical Resistance of Ferromagnetic Amalgams,”Proc. Phys. Soc., 51,778–783 (1939). (Equi Diagram, Meta Phase; Experimental)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 40Bat:.
    L.F. Bates and C J.W. Baker, “Ferromagnetic Co and Ni in Hg,”Proc. Phys. Soc., 52,443–451 (1940). (Meta Phase, Magnetism; Experimental)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 43Kat:.
    N. Katoh, “X-Ray Study on Co Amalgam,”J. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 64, 1211–1212 (1943) in Japanese; afterChem. Abstr. 41, 3338d (1947). (Equi Diagram, Meta Phase; Experimental)Google Scholar
  8. 50Paw:.
    F. Pawlek, “Magnetic Properties of Amalgams of Iron Metals,”Z. Metallkd., 41, 451–453 (1950) in German. (Equi Diagram, Meta Phase, Magnetism; Experimental)Google Scholar
  9. 53Lih:.
    F. Lihl, “Investigations of Amalgams of Metals Mn, Fe, Co and Cu,”Z. Metallkd., 44, 160–166 (1953) in German. (Equi Diagram, Meta Phase; Experimental)Google Scholar
  10. 53Mci:.
    W.H. Meiklejohn, “Experimental Study of the Coercive Force of Fine Particles,”Rev. Modern Phys., 25,302–306 (1953). (MetaPhase, Magnetism; Experimental)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 54Dew:.
    J.F. deWet and R. A.W. Haul, “On the Solubility of Some Transition Metals in Hg,”Z. Anorg. Chem., 277,96–112 (1954) in German. (Equi Diagram; Experimental)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 56Str:.
    J.F. Strachan and N.L. Harris, “Attack of Unstressed Metals by Liquid Hg,”J. Inst. Met., 85, 17–24 (1956-57). (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  13. 57Hen:.
    W. Henning and E. Vogt, “On Magnetic Particle-Size Determination of Highly Dispersed Fe and Co,”ZNaturforsch., 12a, 754–755 (1957) in German. (MetaPhase, Magnetism; Experimental)ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 58Lub:.
    F.E. Luborsky, “Kinetics of Growth of Spherical Co Crystallities in Hg,”J. Phys. Chem., 62, 1131–1132 (1958). (Meta Phases, Magnetism; Experimental)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 61Wee:.
    J.R. Weeks, S. Fink, and A. Minardi, “Liquidus Curves of Binary Systems with Hg,” USAEC Rep. BNL-705,56-57 (1961). (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  16. 62Lub:.
    F.E. Luborsky, “Comparison of the Size Particles of Fe, Co and Alloys of Fe-Co in Hg as Determined by Various Methods,”J. Appl. Phys., 33,1909–1913 (1962). (MetaPhases, Magnetism; Experimental)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 63Jan:.
    G. Jangg and H. Palman, “The Solubility of Metals in Hg,”Z. Metallkd., 54, 364–369 (1963) in German. (Equi Diagram, Thermo; Experimental)Google Scholar
  18. 63Wee1:.
    J.R. Weeks and S. Fink, “Studies with Liquid Hg,” USAEC Rep. BNL-799,85 (1963). (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  19. 63Wee2:.
    J.R. Weeks and S. Fink, “Studies with Liquid Hg,” USAEC Rep. BNL-823,80 (1963). (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  20. 63Wee3:.
    Jr. Weeks, A. Minardi, and S. Fink, “Studies with Liquid Hg,” USAEC Rep. BNL-841,76 (1963). (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  21. 63Wil:.
    C. Willhelm, “Preventing Corrosion by Liquid Metals,”Mater. Des. Eng., 58,97–99 (1963). (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  22. 64Par:.
    M.F. Parkman, B.E. Farwell, D.K. Whaley, and R.V. Arabian, “Hg Corrosion in Haynes 25 and Type 405 Stainless Steel Thermal Convection Capsules,”Extend. Abstr. of Washington Meeting of the ElectmChem. Soc., Vol. 2, 27–30 (1964). (Equi Diagram, Meta Phases; Experimental)Google Scholar
  23. 64Wee:.
    J.R. Weeks and S. Fink, “Liquidus Curves with Hg,” USAEC Rep. BNL-900,136-138 (1964). (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  24. 65Nej:.
    J.F. Nejedlik and EJ. Vargo, “Material Resistance to Hg Corrosion,”Electrochem. Technol., 3,250–258 (1965). (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  25. 67Wee:.
    J.R. Weeks, “Liquidus Curves and Corrosion of Fe, Co, Cr, Ni, V, Nb, Ta, Ti, Zr in 500-750 °C Mercury,“Corrosion, 23, 98–106 (1967). (Equi Diagram, Thermo; Experimental)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 69Spe:.
    E.F. Speranskaya and L.S. Panina, “Electrolysis of W(VI) on Hg Electrode in Presence of Co,”Elektrokhimiya, 5,557–560 (1969) in Russian. (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  27. 71Ale:.
    B.N. Aleksandrov and O.I. Lomonos, “Solubility of Metals in Solid Hg,”Zh. Fiz. Khim., 45, 3003–3006 (1971) in Russian. (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  28. 71Fle:.
    A.H. Fleitman and J.R. Weeks, “Hg as a Nuclear Coolant,”Nucl. Eng. Des., 16,266–278(1971). (Equi Diagram; Experimental)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 73Bab:.
    G.N. Babkin and A.F. Omarova, “On Potential of Amalgam of Ni, Measured by Use of Second Sonde,”Izv. V.U.Z., Khim. Khim. Tekhnol., 16,158–159 (1973)inRussian. (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  30. 73Jan:.
    G. Jangg and E. Lugscheider, “The Solubility of Hg in Various Metals,”Monatsh. Chem., 104,1269–1275 (1973) in German. (Equi Diagram, Crys Structure; Experimental)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 80Cha:.
    S.W. Charles and J. Popplewell, “Ferromagnetic Liquids,”Ferromagnetic Materials, E.P. Wohlfarth, Ed., North Holland, Amsterdam, Vol. 2,509-559 (1980). (Equi Diagram, Meta Phases; Review)Google Scholar
  32. 83Nie:.
    A.K. Niessen, F.R. deBoer. R. Boom, P.F. deChatel, W.C.M. Mattens, and A.R. Miedema, “Model Predictions for the Enthalpy of Formation of Transition Metal Alloys,”Calphad, 7,51 -70 (1983). (Equi Diagram, Thermo; Theory)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 84Kee:.
    L. Keeling, S.W. Charles, and J. Popplewell, “The Prevention of Diffiisional Growth of Co Particles in Hg,”J. Phys. F, 14,3093–3100 (1984). (Meta Phases, Magnetism; Experimental)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 87Bor:.
    J. Borodzinski, unpublished data, University of Warsaw, Poland; private communication to the evaluator (1987). (Equi Diagram; Experimental)Google Scholar
  35. 89Gum:.
    C. Guminski, “Selected Properties of Simple Amalgams,”J. Mater. Sci., 24,2661–2676 (1989). (Equi Diagram, Thermo; Experimental)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 92Gum1:.
    C. Guminski, “The Melting and Boiling Points of Hg,”J. Phase Equilibria, 13(4),339 (1992). (Equi Diagram; Review)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 92Gum2:.
    C. Guminski, “The Hg (Mercury) System,”J. Phase Equilibria, 13(6), 657–663 (1992). (Equi Diagram; Review)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Guminski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of WarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations