Comparative C19-radiosteroid metabolism by MA 160 and HeLa cell lines
- 19 Downloads
Since the designation of the human MA 160 line as prostatic epithelial cells has been questioned and the possibility of HeLa cross contamination raised, this comparative study of C19-radiosteroid transformation in MA 160 and HeLa monolayer cultures was done to determine whether these cells possess the distinguishing features of reductive and oxidative androgen metabolism expected in male and female genital organs, respectively. We compared the radiometabolite patterns produced by incubating [14C]testosterone (300nM) and [3H]testosterone (3nm) and 5α-dihydrotestosterone (17β-hydroxy-5α-androstan-3-one) with cultures of prostatic MA 160 and HeLa Parent, TCRC-1, TCRC-2 and ATC 229 cells. C19-Radiosteroid metabolite patterns from MA 160 cell incubations also were compared with patterns generated by MA 196 fibroblasts from abdomnal skin of the same donor. MA 160 cells metabolized radiotestosterone predominantly to 5α-dihydrotestosterone, 5α-androstane-3α,17β-diol and 5α-androstane-3β,17β-diol. The diol epimers were the principal metabolites of 5α-dihydrotestosterone radiosubstrate. In contrast, radiotestosterone metabolism by MA 196 and HeLa Parent, TCRC-1 and TCRC-2 cells was overwhelmingly to the 17-oxosteroids 4-androstene-3,17-dione and androsterone. Another pathway was operative in HeLa 229 and, to a minor extent, in TCRC-1, which converted radiotestosterone to 4-androstene-3α,17β-diol and 5α-androstane-3α,17β-dol, with little formation of 5α-dihydrotestosterone. MA 160 cells thus metabolize radiotestosterone preponderantly to 5α-reduced 17β-hydroxysteroids as expected for prostatic epithelial cells, whereas HeLa cells show heterogeneity in metabolizing the labeled hormone by the alternative 17-oxosteroid and Δ4 pathways.
Key wordsMA 160 cells HeLa cell lines monolayer culture radiotestosterone metabolism cross contamination
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Peterson, W. D., Jr., W. F. Simpson, P. S. Ecklund, and C. S. Stullberg 1973. Diploid and heteroploid human cell lines surveyed for Y chromosome fluorescence. Nature [New Biol.] 242: 22–24.Google Scholar
- 5.Ofner, P., R. L. Vena, N. J. Barowsky, and A. H. Tashjian, Jr. 1973. C19-Steroid metabolism by the MA 160 line of human prostatic cells (Abstr.). In Vitro 8: 436.Google Scholar
- 15.Chamberlain, J., N. Jagarinec, and P. Ofner 1966. Catabolism of (4-14C)testosterone by subcellular fractions of human prostate. J. Biochem. 99: 610–616.Google Scholar
- 16.Ofner, P., I. Leav, and L. F. Cavazos 1974. C19-Steroid metabolism in male accessory sex glands. Correlation of changes in fine structure and radiometabolite patterns in the prostate of the androgen-deprived dog. In: D. Brandes (Ed.),Male Accessory Sex Organs. Structure and Function in Mammals. Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–305.Google Scholar
- 24.Robertson, A. L., and A. Fenton. Personal communication.Google Scholar
- 25.Vincent, M. M. 1976. In: J. T. Grayhack, J. D. Wilson, and M. J. Scherbenske (Eds.),Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Proceedings of the Workshop at NIH, February 20–21, 1975, Bethesda, Md., p. 244.Google Scholar
- 26.Fraley, E. E., and D. F. Paulson 1974. Experimental carcinogenesis of the prostate. In: D. Brandes (Ed.),Male Accessory Sex Organs. Structure and Function in Mammals. Academic Press, New York, pp. 383–396.Google Scholar