Beginning of the technogene

  • Ter-Stepanian G. 


Beginning from the Holecene human activity has increased and became more and more intensive as a results of transition from food appropriation to food production. It should be separated from the common group “activity of organisms” and considered as an independent geological agent increasingly affecting the course of many exogenous and some endogenous, processes. The course of these processes during the whole Proterozoic and Phanerozoic (about 2.5 billion years) is compared with that during the last 10 thousand years. The Earth's face changes quickly. This makes it possible to assert the transition from the Quaternary or the Pleistocene to the Quinary or the Technogene which has begun in the Holocene and will set in completely during the next millenium.


Holocene Ground Water Level Longitudinal Profile Artificial Rock Opencast Mining 

Commencement du technogène


A partir de l'Holocène l'activité humaine s'est accrue et est, devenue de plus en plus intense du fait de la transition de l'appropriation de norriture à sa production. Elle doit être séparée du groupe commun «activité des organismes» et considérée comme un agent géologique indépendant, qui influence certains processus exogènes ainsi que quelques processus endogèssus endogènes. Le cours de ces processus pendant tout le Protérozoïque et le Phanerozoïque (environ 2.5 milliards années) est comparé à celui des 10 derniers millénaires. La face de la Terre change rapidement. Cela permet d'affirmer la transition du Quaternaire ou du Pleistocène au «Quinaire» ou «Technogène», qui a commencé à l'Holocène et se développera pendant le prochain millénaire.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AGUESSE P., 1975: L'écologie Coll “Clefs”, Seghers, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. BOESSNECK J., 1958: Zur Entwicklung vor- und frühgeschichtlicher Haus- und Wildtiere Bayerns in Rahmen der gleichzeitigen Tierwelt Mitteleuropas, Studien an vor- und frühgeschichtlichen Tierresten Bayerns. II. München.Google Scholar
  3. BOLT B.A., HORN W.L., MACDONALD G.A., SCOTT R.F., 1977: Geological hazards: earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanoes, avalanches, landslides, floods. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  4. CHILDE V.G., 1948: Man makes Himself. London.Google Scholar
  5. DORST J., 1965: Avant que Nature meure. Switzerland.Google Scholar
  6. FIRSENKOVA V.M., 1982: Man's activity and relief (on example of the Kurskaja model district). Geomorphologia, No. 3. pp. 82–91 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. KOTLOV F.V., 1978: Changing the geological environment under action of human activity. Moscow: Nedra (in Russian).Google Scholar
  8. LEGGET R.F., 1968: Man as a geological agent. Věstní ŭstředniho ŭstavu geologickeho, Ročnik XLIII, Cialo 4, st. 241–248.Google Scholar
  9. LEGGET R.F., 1973: Cities and Geology. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
  10. LHOTE H., 1958: A la découverte des fresques du Tassili. Paris.Google Scholar
  11. MARTIN P.S., 1967: Prehistoric overkill. In: Prehistoric exterminations (eds. P.S. Martin and H.D. Wright), New Naven, p. 75–120.Google Scholar
  12. PAAVER K., 1965: Forming the terriofauna and changeability of mammals of Baltic region in the Holocene. Botanical Institute, Ac. Sc. Estonian SSR, Tartu (in Russian).Google Scholar
  13. RAJABCHIKOV A.M., 1973: Geosphere's structure and dynamics, its natural development and changes by Man's action. Moscow, Mysl (in Russian).Google Scholar
  14. ROZOVSKY L.B., 1979: Construction on water areas and marine engineering geology. Inzhenernaja Geologija, No. 2, pp. 11–22 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  15. SCHUSTER R.L., 1979: Reservoir-induced landslides. Bull., Intern. Assoc. Eng. Geol., Krefeld, No. 20, pp. 5–18.Google Scholar
  16. SERGEEV Ye.M., 1979: Engineering Geology—a science on geological environment. Inzhenernaja Geologija, No. 1, pp. 3–19. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  17. SERGEV Ye.M., 1982: Man's influence on lithosphere, conception of “geological environment”. In: Engineering geological aspects of rational use and protection of geological environment (ed. Ye.M. Sergeev). Moscow: Nauka, pp. 11–36, (in Russian).Google Scholar
  18. SHERLOCK R.L., 1922: Man as a geological agent. An account on his action on unanimate nature. London.Google Scholar
  19. TER-STEPANIAN G., 1983: Did the Quinary start? Abstracts, XI Congress, Intern. Union for Quaternary Research, Moscow 1982, Moscow, p. 260.Google Scholar
  20. TER-STEPANIAN G., 1985: Beginning of the Quinary or the Technogene. An engineering geological analysis. Laboratory of Geomechanics IGES, Armen. Ac. Sc., Communication No. 5, Yerevan (in Russian; English and Armenian summaries).Google Scholar
  21. VARNES D.J.: Slope movement types and processes. In: Landslides; Analysis and control, R.L. Schuster and R.J. Krizek, eds. Nat. Ac. Sci., Washington, D.C. 1978, pp. 11–33.Google Scholar
  22. VORONKEVICH S.D., 1984: Engineering geological aspects of technogenesis. Inzhenernaja Geologija No. 5, pp. 3–13 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  23. ZÁRUBA Q., MENCL V., 1982: Landslides and their control. 2nd ed. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
  24. ZIANGIROV R.S., VOSKRESENSKAJA L.S., AFONIN A.P., JAKIMOV Ju.F. 1980: Engineering geological characteristics of technogenous deposits in Moscow. Inzhenernaja Geologija, No. 1, pp. 38–50 (in Russian).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Assocaition of Engineering Geology 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ter-Stepanian G. 
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Geomechanics IGESArmen. Ac. Sc.YerevanU.S.S.R.

Personalised recommendations