Abstract
The line transect method is one of the main methods used to estimate primate densities. Several protocols have been proposed to analyze the data recorded under this method but none of them have been widely accepted since there is a considerable controversy about their respective accuracy. In this study, densities of the black colobus monkeyColobus satanas calculated using eight different protocols were compared with the actual density given by the home range method. Rates of polyspecific associations were also compared. The two most accurate estimates of group density (under- or overestimation <10%) were yielded by the protocol that used the maximum transect-to-animal distance and by that of using a fixed distance of 100 m. These protocols, however, underestimated individual density because counts performed from transects underestimated by 23% the average group size. The six other protocols overestimated group density by 20–195%. Factors that could explain these overestimation were discussed. Because histogram of sighting frequency showed several classes of distances with no records and because groups have been detected as far as 160 m, we suggested that the uneven topography of the study site increased the variability of the sighting distances. Combined with a relatively low number of sightings (n=23), this did not allow to identify a sharp detection distance. Rates of polyspecific association found with the two methods were similar. We recommend to investigate the influence of the topography for bias in density estimates when using the line transect method.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brockelman, W. Y.;Ali, R. 1987. Methods of surveying and sampling forest primates populations. In:Primate Conservation in the Tropical Rain Forest,Marsh,C. W.;Mittermeier,R. A. (eds.) Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 23–62.
Brugiere, D. 1998a. Facteurs de variation des densités et des biomasses de primates en milieu tropical forestier: l'exemple des communautés de Cercopithecidae d'Afrique Centrale. Thèse de Diplôme Doctoral, Université de Rennes I, France.
Brugiere, D. 1998b. Population size of the black colobus monkeyColobus satanas and the impact of logging in the Lopé Reserve, central Gabon.Biol. Conserv., 86: 15–20.
Buckland, S. T.;Anderson, D. R.;Burnham, K. P.;Laake, J. L. 1993.Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Population. Chapman & Hill, London.
Burnham, K. P.;Anderson, D. R.;Laake, J. L. 1980. Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations,Wild. Monogr., 72: 1–202.
Butynski, T. M. 1990. Comparative ecology of blue monkeysCercopithecus mitis in high and low density subpopulations.Ecol. Monogr., 60: 1–26.
Defler, R. T.;Pintor, D. 1985. Censusing primates by transect in a forest of known primate density.Int. J. Primatol., 6: 243–259.
Eisenberg, J. F.;Thorington, R. W. 1973. A preliminary analysis of a neotropical mammal fauna.Biotrop., 5: 150–161.
Fleury, M. C. 1999. Ecologie et organisation sociale du Colobe satanColobus satanas. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Rennes I, France.
Garcia, J. E. 1993. Comparisons of estimated densities computed forSaguinus fuscicollis andSaguinus labiatus using line transect sampling.Primates Report, 37: 19–29.
Gautier-Hion, A. 1988. Polyspecific associations among forest guenons: ecological, behavioural and evolutionary aspects. In:A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons.Gautier-Hion, A.;Bourliere, F.;Gautier, J.-P.;Kingdon, J. (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, London, pp. 452–476.
Gautier-Hion, A.;Gautier, J.-P.;Moungazi, A. 1997. Do black colobus in mixed-species groups benefit from increased foraging strategy?C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 320: 67–71.
Gesnot, K. 1994.Inventaire Forestier dans la Forét des Abeilles, Mémoire de fin d'études. Univ. Libre de Bruxelles, Belgique
Glander, K.;Tapia, J.;Fachin, A. 1984. The impact of cropping on wild population ofSaguinus mystax andSaguinus fuscicollis in Peru.Amer. J. Primatol. 7: 89–97.
Glenn, M. E. 1998. Population density ofCercopithecus mona on the carribean island of Grenada.Folia Primatol., 69: 167–171.
Green, K. M. 1978. Primate censusing in Northern Columbia: a comparision of two techniques.Primates, 19: 537–550.
Harrison, M. J. S. 1986. Feeding ecology of black colobusColobus satanas in central Gabon. In:Primate Ecology and Conservation,Else,J. G.;Lee P. C. (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 31–37.
Harrison, M. J. S.;Hladik, C. M. 1986. Un primate granivore: le colobe noir dans la forêt du Gabon. Potentialité d'évolution du comportement alimentaire.Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie), 41: 281–298.
Laake, J. L.;Buckland, S. T.;Anderson, D. R.;Burnham, K. P. 1994.Distance User's Guide Vol.3 Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins.
McGraw, S. 1994. Census, habitat preference and polyspecific association of six monkeys in the Lomako forest, Zaïre.Amer. J. Primatol., 34: 295–307.
McKey, D. B.;Gartlan, J. S.;Waterman, P. G.;Choo, G. M. 1981. Food selection by black colobus monkeys (Colobus satanas) in relation to plant chemistry.Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 16: 115–146.
McKey, D. B.;Waterman, P. G. 1982. Ranging behaviour of a group of black colobus (Colobus satanas) in the Douala-Edea reserve, Cameroon.Folia Primatol., 39: 264–304.
Mitani, M.;Yamagiwa, J.;Oko, R. A.;Moutsambote, J.-M.;Yumoto, T.;Maruhashi, T. 1993. Approaches in density estimates and reconstruction of social groups in a western lowland gorilla population in the Ndoki forest, northern Congo.Tropics, 2: 219–229.
Peres, C. 1999. General guidelines for standardizing line transect surveys of tropical forest primates.Neotrop. Primates, 7: 11–16.
Plumptre, A. J.;Reynolds, V. 1994. The effect of selective logging on the primate populations in the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda,J. Applied Ecol., 31: 631–641.
Rosembaum, B.;O'Brien, T. G.;Kinnaird, M.;Supriatna, J. 1998. Population densities of Sulawesi crested black macaques on Bacan and Sulawesi: effects of habitat disturbances and hunting.Amer. J. Primatol., 44: 89–106.
Simmen, B.;Julliot, C.;Bayart, F., Pages, E. 1998. Densités de primates en forêt guyanaise: Test d'une méthode d'estimation par transect.C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 321: 699–704.
Skinner, C. A. 1985. A field study of Geoffroy's tamarinSaguinus geoffroyi in Panama.Amer. J. Primatol. 9: 15–25.
Struhsaker, T. T. 1981. Census methods for estimating densities. In:Techniques for the Study of Primate Population Ecology,Subcommittee on Conservation of Natural Populations ed., National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 36–80.
Struhsaker, T. T. 1997.Ecology of an African Rain Forest: Logging in Kibale and the Conflict Between Conservation and Exploitation. Univ. Press of Florida, Gainesville.
White, L. T. J. 1994. Blomass of rain forest mammals in the Lopé Reserve, Gabon.J. Anim. Ecol., 63: 499–512.
Whitesides, G. H.;Oates, J. F.;Green, S. M.;Kluberdanz, R. P. 1988. Estimating primate densities from transects in a West African rain forest: a comparision of techniques.J. Anim. Ecol., 57: 345–367.
Wilson, D. E.;Reeder, D. M. 1993.Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Smithsonian Instit. Press, Washington D.C..
Wolfheim, J. H. 1983.Primates of the World: Distribution, Abundance and Conservation. Univ. of Washington Press, Seattle.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Brugiere, D., Fleury, MC. Estimating primate densities using home range and line transect methods: A comparative test with the black colobus monkeyColobus satanas . Primates 41, 373–382 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557648
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557648