Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 27–29 | Cite as

Centrifugal osteopetrosis: appendicular sclerosis with relative sparing of the vertebrae

  • Christopher S. Kovacs
  • Robert G. W. Lambert
  • Guy J. Lavoie
  • Kerry Siminoski
Article

Abstract

A previously unreported pattern of bone involvement in autosomal dominant osteopetrosis is described in three affected members of a Vietnamese kindred. The hands, feet, distal bones, and skull were markedly osteosclerotic on radiologic examination. The vertebrae displayed very minimal thickening of the endplates in two of the cases, and no visible involvement in the third. The vertebral bone density (assessed by dual-energyX-ray absorptiometry) was markedly elevated, suggesting that the spine was not completely spared. This pattern contrasts with the predominantly axial distribution of the recognized variants of osteopetrosis.

Key words

Osteopetrosis Bone mineral density Bone dysplasia Absorptiometry, dual energyX-ray Osteosclerosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aurbach GD, Marx SJ, Spiegel AM. Metabolic bone disease. In: Wilson JD, Foster DW, eds, Williams textbook of endocrinology. 8th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1992; 1477–1517.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bollerslev J, Mosekilde L. Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis. Clin Orthop 1993; 294: 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shapiro F. Osteopetrosis. Current clinical considerations. Clin Orthop 1992; 294: 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whyte MP. Hereditary metabolic and dysplastic skeletal disorders. In: Coe FL, Favus MJ, eds. Disorders of bone and mineral metabolism. New York: Raven; 1992: 977–1026.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whyte MP. Sclerosing bone dysplasias. In: Favus MJ, ed. Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism. 2nd edn. New York: Raven; 1993: 327–344.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andersen PA, Bollerslev J. Heterogeneity of autosomal dominant osteopetrosis. Radiology 1987; 164: 223–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bollerslev J, Andersen PA. Radiological, biochemical and hereditary evidence of two types of autosomal dominant osteopetrosis. Bone 1988; 9: 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaplan FS, August CS, Dalinka MK, et al. Bone densitometry observations of osteopetrosis in response to bone marrow transplantation. Clin Orthop 1993; 294: 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bollerslev J, Marks SC, Pockwinse S, et al. Ultrastructural investigations of bone resorptive cells in two types of autosomal dominant osteopetrosis. Bone 1993; 14: 865–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Skeletal Society 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher S. Kovacs
    • 1
  • Robert G. W. Lambert
    • 2
  • Guy J. Lavoie
    • 3
  • Kerry Siminoski
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Radiology and Diagnostic ImagingUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations