Advertisement

Pharmaceutisch Weekblad

, Volume 5, Issue 5, pp 239–242 | Cite as

Optimization of a novel two-phase potentiometric titration method of barbiturates with mercury (II)

Part I: Theory
  • P. M. J. Coenegracht
  • H. J. Metting
  • D. A. Doornbos
Original Articles

Abstract

A two-phase potentiometric titration procedure for barbiturates with mercury(II) was developed. In the new titration procedure the barbituric acid derivative is dissolved in an aqueous borate buffer. An organic phase consisting of chloroform and benzyl alcohol is added, and the vigourously stirred contents of the titration vessel are titrated by a mercury(II) nitrate solution.

The theory of the conditional formation constant in a two-phase system is derived to provide a basis for the selection of optimal titration conditions. It is shown that the new conditional formation constant of the two-phase system, K*, increases if the mercury-barbiturate complex is extracted into the organic layer. By extraction of the barbituric acid derivative into the organic layer K* is diminished, but this effect can be minimized by a correct choice of the pH of the aqueous layer. The influence of these factors on the pM jump in the equivalence point is demonstrated by calculation of the corresponding theoretical titration curves.

Keywords

Mercury Borate Benzyl Organic Layer Benzyl Alcohol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, R.D., M. Fleischmann andJ.W. Oldfield (1969)Trans. Farad. Soc. 65, 3053–3063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Björling, C.O., A. Berggren andB. Nygärd (1962)Acta Chem. Scand. 16, 1481–1492.Google Scholar
  3. Bult, A., andH.B. Klasen (1976)Spectroscopy Letters 9, 81–94.Google Scholar
  4. Coenegracht, P.M.J., andA.J.M. Duisenberg (1975)Anal. Chim. Acta 78, 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coenegracht, P.M.J., andH.J. Metting (1975)Anal. Chim. Acta 80, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coenegracht, P.M.J., A. Bult andH.J. Metting (1977)Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem. 284, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doornbos, D.A., andR.A. De Zeeuw (1969)Pharm. Weekbl. 104, 233–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hannema, U. (1968) Thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  9. Hendrickx, A. (1954)J. Pharm. Belg. 91, 132–140.Google Scholar
  10. Monforte, J.R., andW.C. Purdy (1970)Anal. Chim. Acta 52, 25–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pfeil, E., andH.J. Goldbach (1955)Z. Physiol. Chem. 302, 263–267.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. M. J. Coenegracht
    • 1
  • H. J. Metting
    • 1
  • D. A. Doornbos
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Group OptimizationLaboratory of Pharmaceutical and Analytical ChemistryAW GroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations