Two different dosages of ciprofloxacin in patients with respiratory tract infections
- 23 Downloads
Fifty-one patients with chronic obstructive lung disease with a proven bacterial respiratory tract infection were treated with ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily or 750 mg twice daily. Both dosages were given orally for approximately 10 days. The higher dosage showed a reduced amount of reinfections and relapses (19% and 16% versus 5% and 0%). The overall results were the same in both groups. Adverse reactions were mild: nausea and visual disturbances were seen in five patients. Eights patients had slight liver test abnormalities. In one patient a seizure occurred. All adverse reactions were of a temporary nature.
KeywordsCiprofloxacin Pulmonary diseases, chronic obstructive Respiratory tract infections
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Ingram RH Jr. Chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and airways obstruction. In: Petersdorf RO, Adams RO, Braunwals E, Isselbacher KJ, Martin JB, Wilson JD, eds. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1983:1550.Google Scholar
- 2.Rose RM, Pinkston P, O'Donnell C, Jensen A. Viral infection of the lower respiratory tract. Clin Chest Med 1987;8:411.Google Scholar
- 7.Haverkorn MJ. Ciprofloxacin therapy of respiratory tract infection withPseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur J Clin Microb 1988;7:661–4.Google Scholar
- 8.Hoogkamp-Korstanje JAA, Klein SJ. Treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis with ciprofloxacin. Pharm Weekbl [Sci] 1987;9(Suppl):60–3.Google Scholar
- 9.Wijnands WJA, Vree TB, Baars AM, Van Herwaarden CLA. The influence of the 4-quinolones ciprofloxacin, pefloxacin and ofloxacin on the elimination of theophyl-line. Pharm Weekbl [Sci] 1987;9(Suppl):72–5.Google Scholar
- 10.Raoof S, Wollschlager CM, Khan FA. Ciprofloxacin increases serum theophylline levels. Chest 1985;88:32.Google Scholar
- 11.Davies BI, Maesen FPV, Baur C. Ciprofloxacin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Eur J Clin Microb 1986;5:226–31.Google Scholar