Advertisement

Pharmacy personnel and fever: A study on perception, self-care and information to customers

  • J. R. Eskerud
  • M. Andrew
  • B. Strømnes
  • E. -L. Toverud
Articles

Abstract

To study the fever perception and self-care of pharmacy personnel as well as the information given to customers about the management of fever problems, a random sample of 152 Norwegian pharmacists and 150 pharmacy technicians were interviewed, in 1989, by a national opinion poll company. One-third thought that body temperatures between 39.0°C and 40.5°C could be lifethreatening. Of all respondents 24% (33% of technicians, 16% of pharmacists) assumed body temperatures to be rising when sweating accompanied fever. In cases of common cold or influenza accompanied by fever 56% of the personnel would use antipyretics. 7% Of the staff (14% of technicians, 1% of pharmacists) believed penicillin to be effective against viral infections. Antipyretic drug preferences were consistent, but a wide range of perceptions was revealed, in particular with respect to start of antipyretic therapy and seeking medical care for children. Undergraduate and postgraduate education of pharmacy personnel should aim more at satisfying the demand for information of the general public and focus more on the symptomatic treatment of fever and minor illness in general. Pharmacists in charge have a special responsibility in counselling their assistants.

Keywords

Analgesics, anti-inflammatory Fever Patient information Pharmacists Pharmacists' aides 

References

  1. 1.
    Smith FJ, Salkind MR. Factors influencing the extent of the pharmacist's advisory role in Greater London. Pharm J 1990; 244(Suppl):R4–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drawi M. Extending the role of the community pharmacist. BMJ 1991;302:427–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goodburn E, Mattosinho S, Mongi P, Waterson T. Management of childhood diarrhoea by pharmacists and parents: is Britain lagging behind the Third World? BMJ 1991;302: 440–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmitt B. Fever in childhood. Pediatrics 1984;74:929–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eskerud JR, Lærum E, Fagerthun H, Lunde PKM, Næss A. Fever in general practice I. Frequency and diagnoses. Fam Pract 1992;9:263–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levin LS, Beske F, Fry J. Self-medication in Europe. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 1988.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Norsk Medisinaldepot. Legemiddelforbruket i Norge 1986–1990 [Drug consumption in Norway 1986–1990]. Oslo: Norsk Medisinaldepot, 1991.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fletcher JL jr, Creten D. Perceptions of fever among adults in a family practice setting. J Fam Pract 1986;22:427–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmitt BD. Fever phobia. Misconceptions of parents about fevers. Am J Dis Child 1980;134:176–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kramer MS, Naimark L, Leduc DG. Parental fever phobia and its correlates. Pediatrics 1985;75:1110–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eskerud JR, Hoftvedt BO, Lærum E. Fever: knowledge, perception and attitudes. Results from a Norwegian population study. Fam Pract 1991;8:32–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eskerud JR, Hoftvedt BO, Lærum E. Fever: management and self-medication. Results from a Norwegian population study. Fam Pract 1991;8:148–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Colombotos J. Personal versus telephone interviews: effect on responses. Public Health Rep 1969;84:773–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Curtis P, Talbot A, Evens S, Smart A, Speros L The telephone survey in family practice. J Fam Pract 1981;12:521–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siemiatycki J. A comparison of mail, telephone and home interview strategies for household health surveys. Am J Public Health 1979;69:238–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lærum E. Feber [Fever]. In: Vennerød AM, editor. Norsk legemiddelhåndbok 1992–93 for helsepersonell. Oslo: Norsk legemiddelhåndbok I/S, 1992.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Coggon DNM, Vessey MP. Errors in using clinical thermometers. BMJ 1976;1:692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Condren L, Cox G, Cummins J, Delap J, Dillon J, Golden N, et al. How good are we at guessing fever? Ir Med J 1986;79: 15–6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eskerud JR, Brodwall A. General practitioners and fever: a study on perception, self-care and advice to patients. Pharm World Sci 1993;15(4):161–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gray JD, Blaschke TF. Fever: to treat or not to treat. Rat Drug Ther 1985; 19:1–6.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gudnason P, Ludvigsson P. Feber hos barn [Childhood fever]. Nord Med 1992;107:10–1.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McCarthy PL, Stashwick CA, Dolan TF, Forsyth BW, Fink HD, Etkin T. Further definition of history and observation variables in assessing febrile children. Pediatrics 1981;67: 687–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McCarthy PL, Lembo RM, Fink HD, Baron MA, Cichetti DV. Observation, history, and physical examination in diagnosis of serious illness in febrile children ≤24 months. J Pediatr 1987;110:26–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kouvalainen K. Feber — væn eller fiende? [Fever — friend or foe?] Nord Med 1992;107:4–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Consumers' Association. Advice across the chemists' counter. Which? 1985 Aug:351–4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Periodicals Service Company 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Eskerud
    • 1
  • M. Andrew
    • 2
  • B. Strømnes
    • 3
  • E. -L. Toverud
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of General PracticeUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of PharmacotherapeuticsUniversity of OsloNorway
  3. 3.Norwegian Association of Proprietary PharmacistsOsloNorway
  4. 4.Department of Social Pharmacy, Institute of PharmacyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations