Advertisement

Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 48–53 | Cite as

Information about drugs in family magazines

  • Anke M. van Trigt
  • Lolkje T. W. de Jong-van den Berg
  • Minke Pasman
  • Flora M. Haaijer-Ruskamp
  • Jaap Willems
  • T. F. J. (Dick) Tromp
Articles

Abstract

Family magazines can play an important role in the diffusion of medical information and information regarding drugs to a ‘lay audience’. We describe what kind of drugs are discussed in the family magazines and which information regarding these drugs is given. Furthermore, we look into the information sources for journalists; special attention is paid to the role of the pharmacist: is (s)he recognized by journalists as one of the experts on drugs? Two approaches were used in order to answer the above described research questions: a content analysis of family magazines and indepth interviews of journalists. Gynaecological products as well as drugs for the central nervous system receive much attention in family magazines. The kind of information given about drugs is limited. Only part of the publications pays attention to side-effects. Patients asking questions about drugs in response to publications in family magazines know the name of a drug but are rarely informed about other aspects of the therapy, such as side-effects. In the provision of information physicians and medical specialists play an important role as sources of information for journalists. There is, however, until now no role for the pharmacist as a source of information on drugs in family magazines.

Keywords

Drugs Journalism Mass media Patient education Periodicals 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    De Jong-van den Berg LTW, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, van Trigt AM. Evaluatie van een voorlichtingsbrochure over geneesmiddelen en de overgang [Evaluation of a brochure about drugs and the menopause]. Pharm Weekbl 1989;124:870–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Jong-van den Berg L, Waardenburg C. Geneesmiddelengebruik tijdens de zwangerschap [Drug utilization during pregnancy]. Groningen: Styx, 1991:47–51.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Visser TJ. Geneesmiddelvoorlichting. Een overzicht [Patient education about drugs. An overview]. Leiden: Instituut voor Huisartsgeneeskunde/Wetenschapswinkel Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, 1989:18, 40.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O'Keefe MT. The first human heart transplant — a study of diffusion among doctors. Journalism Q 1969;46:237–42.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O'Keefe MT. The mass media as sources of medical information for doctors. Journalism Q 1970;47:95–100.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Phillips DP, Kanter EJ, Bednarczyl B, Tastad PL. Importance of the lay press of medical knowledge to the scientific community. N Engl J Med 1991;325(16):1180–3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van den Oudenrijn F. Tijdschriften, een medium voor wetenschap en techniek? [Family magazines, a medium for science and technology?]. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, 1991.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durant JR, Evans GA, Thomas GP. The public understanding of science. Nature 1989;340:11–4.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stumpel HAM. Onderzoek in de praktijk [Research in practice]. Ned Mediagids 1989;13 (May):A531-A4.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hermes J. Sommige dingen doe ik alleen op uit vrouwenbladen en niet uit de praktijk. Over het gebruik van vrouwenbladen en empowerment [Some things I learn by reading family magazines and not by experience. The use of family magazines and empowerment]. Massacommunicatie 1989; 4:283–304.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leemhuis A. De Libelle-arts: enkele functies van een bijzonder soort ‘vrouwenarts’. [The family magazine physician: some functions of a very special kind of physician]. Amstelveen, 1980.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oudkerk RH. Wat merkt de huisarts? [What does the physician notice?]. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynecol 1991;104:316–9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haspels AA. Arts en media [Physician and media]. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynecol 1991;104:328.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wellings K. Help or hype: an analysis of media coverage of the 1983 “Pill scare”. In: Leather DS, Hastings GB, O'Reilly K, Davies JK, editors. Health education and the mass media II. Oxford: Pergamon, 1986:109–15.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jones EF, Beniger JR, Westoff CF. Pill and IUD discontinuation in the United States, 1970–1975: the influence of the media. Fam Plann Perspect 1980;12(6):293–300.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D, Spira Kahn J. Effects of professional and media warnings between aspirin use in children and Reye's syndrome. Milbank Q 1992;70(1):155–82.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sturkenboom MCJM, de Jong-van den Berg LTW, Cornel MC, Stricker BHC, Wesseling H. Communicating a drug alert — a case study on acitretin in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1994;47:125–32.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lunde I, Dukes G, editors. The role and fuction of the community and hospital pharmacist in the health care systems of Europe. Groningen: Styx, 1989:53.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nordic Statistics on Drugs 1981–1983. Part II. Nordic drug index with classification and defined daily dose. Uppsala: Nordic Council on Medicines, 1985.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Trigt AM, de Jong-van den Berg LTW, Willems J, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM. Does the scientific medical literature set the agenda for medicines discussed in newspapers [abstract]. Pharm World Sci 1993;15 Suppl K:K14.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vermey GCG. Het gebruik van de anticonceptiepil stijgt nog steeds [The use of oral contraceptives still increases]. Gezondheid/CBS 1989;7:14–9.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van der Laan JW, van Amsterdam JGC, Moerman CJ, Zitman FG, Wieringa NF, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, et al. Chronisch gebruik van slaapen kalmeringsmiddelen [Chronic use of sedatives]. Bilthoven: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieuhygiëne, 1992.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van der Berkel EJC. Gezondheidsenquêtes. Gezondheid en medische consumptie naar geslacht [Health questionnaires. Health and medical consumption by sex]. Maandber Gezondheid 1987;6(3):5–14.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chrisler JC, Levy KB. The media construct a menstrual monster: a content analysis of PMS articles in the popular press. Women Health 1990;16(2):89–104.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elie IHPM. Medische berichtgeving in de media en consultatiegedrag bij huisartsen [Medical news in the mass media and physician consultations]. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, 1992.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Medische rubrieken niet altijd betrouwbaar [Medical features not always reliable]. Consumentengids 1991;(7):436–40.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Klaassen EJ. Geen verkapte reclame in vrouwenbladen [No hidden advertising in family magazines]. InterlnPho mag 1991;(May):7.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Trigt AM, de Jong-van den Berg LTW, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Willems J, Tromp TFJ. Journalists and their sources of ideas and information on drugs. Soc Sci Med 1994;38(4):637–43.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hofstee HH. Geneesmiddelreclame [Drug advertising] [letter]. Med Cont 1991;46(12):358.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van Everdingen JJE, Krol JL. Verborgen verleiders [Hidden persuaders]. In: van Everdingen JJE, Klazinga NS, editors. De wet tot behoud van waarheid. Overveen: Belvédère, 1991:191–201.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bruinsma H, Dekker F. Beïnvloeding van de huisarts door geneesmiddelreclame [Influencing the physician by drug advertising]. Pharm Weekbl 1991;126:1030–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Dutch Association for Advancement of Pharmacy 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anke M. van Trigt
    • 1
  • Lolkje T. W. de Jong-van den Berg
    • 1
  • Minke Pasman
    • 1
  • Flora M. Haaijer-Ruskamp
    • 2
  • Jaap Willems
    • 3
  • T. F. J. (Dick) Tromp
    • 1
  1. 1.Section Social Pharmacy and Pharmaco-epidemiologyGroningen Institute for Drug Studies (GIDS), University Centre for PharmacyAW Groningenthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineGroningen Institute for Drug Studies (GIDS), Northern Centre of Health CareAV Groningen
  3. 3.Faculty of SciencesUniversity of NijmegenGL Nijmegenthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations