The rationality and efficacy of decisions under uncertainty and the value of an experiment
- 100 Downloads
A decision maker faces a known prior distribution over payoff relevant states. We compare the expected utility of this individual under two scenarios. In the first, the decision maker makes a choice without further information. In the second, the decision maker has access to an experiment before choosing an action. However, the decision maker does not know the true joint distribution over states and messages. The value of the experiment as measured by the difference in the two utility levels can be negative as well as positive. We give a condition which is necessary and sufficient for the experiment to be valuable in our sense, for any decision problem.
JEL classification numberD81
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Blackwell, D.: The comparison of experiments. Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 93–102. University of California Press 1951Google Scholar
- 2.Gale, D.: The theory of linear economic models. New York: McGraw-Hill 1960Google Scholar
- 3.McKenzie, L.: Matrices with dominant diagonals. In Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Proceedings of the First Stanford Symposium. Arrow, K., Karlin, S., Suppes, P. (eds.) Standard: Stanford University Press 1960Google Scholar
- 4.Lehrer, E.: Comparison of experts. Unpublished working paper, Northwestern University (1994)Google Scholar
- 5.Nikaido, H.: Convex structures and economic theory. New York: Academic Press 1968Google Scholar