Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 30, Issue 19, pp 4973–4979 | Cite as

Hydrogen activation of LaNi5: Implications of fracture mechanisms on hydriding properties

  • T. Kastrissios
  • E. Kisi
  • S. Myhra


The fracture mechanisms of two different LaNi5 alloys (A and B) have been investigated during the first few hydrogen loading/unloading cycles that constitute activation of this material. The principal difference between the two formulations was the presence of Nideficient planar inclusions, oriented perpendicular to the crystallographicc-axis, in alloy A. Both types were found to fracture at high loadings of hydrogen (hydrogen-to-metal ratios of ca. 1) during the activation cycle, as a result of the differential expansion between the microdomains of the α-and β-hydride phases. However, alloy A also fractured at an earlier stage in the activation cycle, at very low hydrogen-to-metal ratios (≤0.06), by delamination at the planar inclusion boundaries. This had the effect of reducing the hysteresis during the first activation cycle, most probably due to faster kinetics. The implication is that the hydrogen storage properties of the alloy can be tailored by microstructural design.


Hydrogen Polymer Fracture Mechanism High Loading Hydrogen Storage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. H. van Mal,Philips Res. Rep., Suppl.,1 (1976) 1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. B. Flanagan andJ. D. Clewley,J. Less-Common Met.,83 (1982) 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. R. Lacher,Proc. R. Soc. A.,161 (1937) 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. H. Kisi, C. E. Buckley andE. M. Gray,J. Alloys and Compounds,185 (1992) 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Lartigue, A. Percheron-Guegan, J. C. Achard andJ. L. Soubeyroux,J. Less-Common Met.,113 (1985) 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Lartigue, A. Le Bail andA. Percheron-Guegan,J. Less-Common Met.,129 (1987) 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Fischer, A. Furrer, G. Busch andL. Schlapbach,Helvetica Physica Acta,50 (1977) 421.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. L. Bowman, J. L. Anderson andN. G. Nereson in Proceedings of the 10th Rare Earth Research Conference, Arizona, 1973, edited by C. J. Kevane and T. Mueller, p. 485.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. E. Buckley, PhD thesis, Griffith University, Australia (1993).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    “ASM handbook—alloy phase diagrams”, Vol. 3 (The Materials Information Society, USA, 1992).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. H. Kisi, E. M. Gray andS. J. Kennedy,Alloys and Compounds,216 (1994) 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Kastrissios, MPhil. thesis, Griffith University, Australia (1993).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Kastrissios
    • 1
  • E. Kisi
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Myhra
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations