I have not sought here to make a case for participatory action research as theonly mode for inquiry and action with self-help groups, but to raise issues that may help counter the dominance of the conventional model and encourage a more pluralistic scientific enterprise. Researchers must be competent in and free to use (or try to use) whatever paradigms and techniques best fit their own epistemological preferences, the phenomena they wish to understand, and the goals and resources they and their coparticipants have. In particular, the assumptions and operating styles associated with PAR seem especially relevant and useful for inquiry and action that can advance knowledge about, and contribute to the effectiveness of, self-help groups. Dogma about “the proper scientific method” may suit the current scientific establishment and governmental funding agencies, but it does not necessarily lead to good research, research that is valid and useful to the scholarly community and to the self-help movement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Anderson, B. (1988).Considering whether to participate in research. Boston: Federation for Children with Special Needs. [mimeo]
Bickman, L. (Ed.) (1982).Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 3). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Borkman, T. (1984). Mutual self-help groups: Strengthening the selectively unsupporting personal and community networks of their members. In A. Gartner & F. Riessman (Eds.),The self-help revolution. New York: Human Sciences.
Borkman, T. (1990). Experiential, professional and lay frames of reference. In T. Powell (Ed.),Working with self-help. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
Brown, D., & Kaplan, R. (1981). Participative research in a factory. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds.),Human Inquiry. New York: Wiley.
Brown, D., & Tandon, R. (1983). Ideology and political economy in inquiry: Action research and participatory research.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science.19, 277–294.
Cancian, F., & Armistead, C. (1990).Participatory research: An introduction. Irvine, CA: Department of Sociology, UC-Irvine. [mimeo]
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1983).Becoming critical: Knowledge through action research. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Chein, I., Cook, S., & Harding, J. (1948). The field of action research.American Psychologist, 3, 43–50.
Chesler, M. (1990). Action research in the voluntary sector: A case study of scholar-activist roles in self-help groups. In S.. Wheelan, E. Pepitone, & V. Abt (Eds.),Advances in field theory. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Chesler, M. (1991). Mobilizing consumer activism in health care: The role of self-help groups. InResearch in social movements, Conflict and change, 13, 275–305.
Elden, M. (1981). Sharing the research work: Participative research and its role demands. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds.),Human inquiry. New York: Wiley.
Fals-Borda, O. (1984). Participatory action research.Development: Seeds of Change, 2, 18–20.
Freeman, H., Dynes, R., Rossi, P., & Whyte, W. (Eds.). (1983).Applied sociology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Freire, P. (1973).Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seabury.
Gaventa, J. (1988). Participatory research in North America.Convergence, 21(2/3), 41–46.
Gaventa, J. (in press). The powerful, the powerless and the experts: Knowledge struggles in an information age. In P. Park, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.),Participatory research in America.
Hall, B., Gillette, A., & Tandon, R. (1982).Creating knowledge: A monopoly. New Delhi and Toronto: Society for Participatory Research and International Council for Adult Education.
Israel, B., Schurman, S., & House, J. (1989). Action research on occupational stress: involving workers as researchers.International Journal of Health Seivices, 19, 135–155.
Jacobs, J., & Dopkeen, L. (1990). Risking the qualitative study of risk.Qualitative Sociology, 13(2), 169–181.
Jacobs, M., & Goodman, G. (1989). Psychology and self-help groups.American Psychologist, 44, 536–545.
Katz, A. (1981). Self-help and mutual aid: An emerging social movement?Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 129–155.
Keller, E. (1985).Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Killilea, M. (1976). Mutual help organizations: Interpretations in the literature. In R. Caplan & M. Killilea (Eds.),Support systems and mutual help. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Lavoie, F. (1984). Action research: A new model of interaction between the professional and self-help groups. In A. Gartner & F. Riessman (Eds.),The self-help revolution. New York: Human Sciences.
Levy, L (1984). Issues in research and evaluation. In A. Gartner & F. Riessman (Eds.),The self-help revolution. New York: Human Sciences.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems.Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.
Lidz, C., & Ricci, F. (1990). Funding large-scale qualitative sociology.Qualitative Sociology, 13(2), 113–126.
Lieberman, M., & Borman, L. (Eds.) (1979).Self-help groups for coping with crisis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lincoln, Y., & Cuba, E. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Meehl, P. (1986). What social scientists don't understand. In D. Fiske & R. Schweder (Eds.),Metatheory in social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Patton, M. (1978).Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Powell, T. (1987).Self-help organizations and professional practice. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
Rappaport, J., Seidman, E., Toro, P., McFadden, L., Reischel, T., Roberts, L., Salem, D., & Zimmerman, M. (1985). Collaborative research with a mutual help organization.Social Policy, 15(3), 12–24.
Report of Consensus Conference on Principles of Family Research. (1989). Lawrence, KS: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitative Programs and the Beach Center on Families and Disability.
Rossi, P., Wright, J., & Wright, S. (1978). The theory and practice of applied social research.Evaluation Quarterly, 2(2), 171–192.
Rowan, J. (1981). A dialectical paradigm for research. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds.),Human inquiry. New York: Wiley.
Sanford, N. (1970). Whatever happened to action research?Journal of Social Issues, 26, 3–23.
Susman, G., & Evered, R. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 582–603.
Tichy, N., & Friedman, S. (1983). Institutional dynamics of action research. In R. Kilman & C. Thomas (Eds.),Producing useful information for organizations. New York: Praeger.
Whyte, W., Greenwood, D., & Lazes, P. (1989). Participatory action research.American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 513–551.
Whyte, W. (1986). On the uses of social science research.American Sociological Review, 51, 551–563.
Wollert, R., Knight, B., & Levy, L. (1984). Make today count: A collaborative model for professionals and self-help groups. In A. Gartner & F. Riessman (Eds.),The self-help revolution. New York: Human Sciences.
Yoak, M., & Chesler, M. (1985). Alternative professional roles in health care delivery: Leadership patterns in self-help groups.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, 427–444.
About this article
Cite this article
Chesler, M.A. Participatory action research with self-help groups: An alternative paradigm for inquiry and action. Am J Commun Psychol 19, 757–768 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00938043
- Social Psychology
- Health Psychology
- Scientific Method
- Scientific Establishment
- Participatory Action