Parasitology Research

, Volume 79, Issue 7, pp 593–598 | Cite as

Migration of sporozoites and merogony ofEimeria coecicola in gut-associated lymphoid tissue

  • M. Pakandl
  • P. Coudert
  • D. Licois
Original Investigations


The invasive phase ofEimeria coecicola was studied during the first 80 h postinoculation (p.i.). Using a method that synchronized the life cycle, sporozoites were observed in the duodenum and the jejunum until 32 h p.i. They were seen first in the villous epithelial cells or in host cells resembling intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL). Later they were observed in IEL in the lamina propria. After 48 h p.i., no coccidian stage was identifiable in the mucosa of the small intestine but sporozoites appeared in the lymphoid cells of lymphatic follicles of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (vermiform appendix, sacculus rotundus, and Peyer's patches). The first merogony was observed 64 h p.i. in these lymphoid cells and in membranous epithelial cells (M-cells) but was never seen in the epithelium itself. Morphologically there were two types of meronts, depending on the host cell type, but in both cases the merozoites contained a refractile body and resembled sporozoites. The first meronts of the second generation were observed 80 h p.i. in the villous epithelial cells of the domes of the follicles of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue, where the further development of thisEimeria takes place. This pattern of invasion strongly suggests that sporozoites take an exclusively extraintestinal route to reach the target cells. Moreover, to our knowledge this is the first description of an eimerian merogony that does not take place in epithelial cells.


Epithelial Cell Life Cycle Small Intestine Host Cell Target Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Al-Attar MA, Fernando MA (1987) Transport ofEimeria necatrix sporozoites in the chicken: effects of irritants injected intraperitoneally. J Parasitol 73:494–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheissin EM (1947) The new species of an intestinal coccidium of rabbitEimeria coecicola (in Russian). Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 55:181–183Google Scholar
  3. Coudert P, Licois D, Streun A (1979) Characterization ofEimeria species. I. Isolation and study of pathogenicity of a pure strain ofEimeria perforans (Leuckart, 1879; Sluiter and Swellengrebel, 1912). Z Parasitenkd 59:227–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Coudert P, Licois D, Besnard J (1988a) Establishment of a SPF breeding colony without hysterectomy and handrearing procedures. Proceedings, 4th Congress of the World Rabbit Science Association, October 10–14, Budapest, pp 137–148Google Scholar
  5. Coudert P, Licois D, Provot F (1988b) Differential diagnosis ofEimeria species from the rabbit. Proceedings, 4th Congress of the World Rabbit Science Association, October 10–14, Budapest, p 480Google Scholar
  6. Drouet-Viard F, Licois D, Provot F, Coudert P (1989) Preliminary study of the migration of sporozoites ofE. intestinalis, using monoclonal antibodies. Proceedings, Vth International Coccidiosis Conference: coccidia and intestinal coccidiomorphs, 17–20 October 1989, Tours, p 7Google Scholar
  7. Eid N (1983) Some biological studies onEimeria magna in rabbits using electron microscope. Ph D Thesis, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernando MA, Rose ME, Millard BJ (1987)Eimeria spp. of domestic fowl: the migration of sporozoites intra- and extraenterically. J Parasitol 73:561–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Horton RJ (1967) The route of migration ofEimeria stiedae (Lindeman 1865) sporozoites between the duodenum and bile ducts of the rabbit. Parasitology 57:9–17Google Scholar
  10. Kogut MH, Long PL (1984) Extraintestinal sporozoites of chickenEimeria in chickens and turkeys. Z Parasitenkd 70:287–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lawn AM, Rose ME (1982) Mucosal transport ofEimeria tenella in the caecum of the chicken. J Parasitol 68:1117–1123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Licois D, Coudert P, Bahagia S, Rossi GL (1992a) Characterization ofEimeria species in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus): endogenous development ofEimeria intestinalis Cheissin, 1948. J Parasitol 78:1041–1046PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Licois D, Coudert P, Boivin M, Drouet-Viard F (1992b)Eimeria perforans andE. coecicola: multiplication rate and effect of the acquired protection on the oocyst output. Proceedings, 5th Congress of the World Rabbit Science Association, July 25–30, Corvallis, p 116Google Scholar
  14. Lotze JC, Shalkop WT, Leek RG, Behin R (1964) Coccidial schizonts in mesenteric lymph nodes of sheep and goats. J Parasitol 50:205–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Martial MA, Madara JL (1986) Cryptosporidium: cellular localisation, structural analysis of abortive cell parasite membrane-membrane interaction in guinea pigs, and suggestion of protozoan transport by M-cells. Gastroenterology 90:583–594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Michael E (1976) Sporozoites ofEimeria acervulina within intestinal macrophages in the normal experimental infections. An ultrastructural study. Z Parasitenkd 49:33–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pakandl M (1989) Life cycle ofEimeria coecicola Cheissin, 1947. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 36:97–105Google Scholar
  18. Pellérdy L, Dürr U (1970) Zum endogenen Entwicklungszyklus vonEimeria stiedai (Lindemann 1865) Kisskalt & Hartmann, 1907. Acta Vet Acad Sci Hung 20:227–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rose ME (1958) A study of the life cycle ofEimeria stiedai (Lindeman 1965) and an immunological response of the host. Thesis, Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Schlotyseck E, Ghaffar FA (1981) Merozoites with refractile bodies. Z Parasitenkd 65:117–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Smetana H (1933) Coccidiosis in the liver of rabbits: experimental study of the mode of infection of the liver by sporozoites. Arch Pathol 15:330–339Google Scholar
  22. Streun A, Coudert P, Rossi GL (1979) Characterization ofEimeria species. II. Sequential morphologic study of the endogeneous cycle ofE. perforans (Leuckart 1879, Sluiter and Swellengrebel 1912) in experimentally infected rabbits. Z Parasitenkd 60:37–53Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Pakandl
    • 1
  • P. Coudert
    • 2
  • D. Licois
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of ParasitologyCeské BudějoviceCzechoslovakia
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Pathologie du LapinInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueMonnaieFrance

Personalised recommendations