Noninstitutionalized, educable retarded, spastic cerebral palsied children of two mental age (MA) levels were compared with normal MA controls on a task measuring selective attention and were not found deficient in selective attention. For both the cerebral palsied and the normals there was an increase in selective attention efficiency with an increase in MA. The results support the position that MA rather than chronological age or IQ is the important variable in determining selective attention performance. The results do not support the attention-deficit theory; they do support the argument that institutionalization has a negative affect on attention. The effects of brain damage and retardation on selective attention ability were discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Broadbent, D. A.Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon Press, 1958.
Cruickshank, W. M., Bice, H. V., Wallen, N. E., & Lynch, K. S.Perception and cerebral palsy: Studies in figure-background relationship. (2nd ed.) Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1965.
Dolphin, J. E., & Cruickshank, W. M. The figure-background relationship in children with cerebral palsy.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1951,7, 228–231.
Druker, J. F., & Hagen, J. W. Developmental trends in the processing of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information.Child Development, 1969,40, 371–382.
Fassler, J. Performance of cerebral palsied children under conditions of reduced auditory input.Exceptional Children, 1970,37, 201–209.
Hagen, J. W. The effect of distraction on selective attention.Child Development, 1967,38, 685–694.
Hagen, J. W. Information processing in children. Symposium paper for Carnegie-Mellon University, May 20–21, 1971.
Hagen, J. W., & Frisch, S. R. The effect of incidental cues on selective attention. Report No. 57, USPHS Grant HD 01368, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1968.
Hagen, J. W., & Huntsman, N. J. Selective attention in mental retardates.Developmental Psychology, 1971,5, 151–160.
Hagen, J. W., & Sabo, R. A developmental study of selective attention.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1967,13, 159–172.
Hallahan, D. P., & Cruickshank, W. M.Psychoeducational foundations of learning disabilities. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Ball, D. W. Selective attention and cognitive tempo of low achieving and high achieving sixth grade males.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973,36, 579–583.
Logue, R. D. Visual distractibility in cerebral palsy.Cerebral Palsy Review, 1965,26, 9–11.
Maccoby, E. E., & Hagen, J. W. Effects of distraction upon central versus incidental recall: Developmental trends.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1965,2, 280–289.
Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles of experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
Zeaman, D., & House, B. J. An attentional theory of retardate discrimination learning. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.),Handbook of mental deficiency. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
Zigler, E. Mental retardation: Current issues and approaches. In L. Hoffman & M. Hoffman (Eds.),Review of child development research. Vol. 2. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1966.
Thanks are expressed to Eleanor Rennie, Head Teacher, Robert Massie, Supervisor of Special Education, and E. F. DeFord, Assistant Director, Department of Research for the Richmond Public Schools, Richmond, Virginia. Appreciation is also given to Scott Hamrick, Principal, Jackson Via Elementary School, Charlottesville, Virginia. Susan Autrey is also thanked for assistance in data collection.
About this article
Cite this article
Hallahan, D.P., Stainback, S., Ball, D.W. et al. Selective attention in cerebral palsied and normal children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1, 280–291 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917738
- Negative Affect
- Cerebral Palsy
- Important Variable
- Brain Damage
- Selective Attention