Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Perceptions of communication, cohesion, and adaptability in families of adolescents with and without learning handicaps

Abstract

Adaptability, cohesion, and communication patterns were studied in 30 families of learning-handicapped adolescents and 30 families of nonhandicapped adolescents. Parent and adolescent perspectives on each of these variables were solicited. The results indicated that adolescents in each of these groups had similar perspectives on adaptability, cohesion, and communication. The parents of the learning-handicapped adolescents, however, felt that their families were less cohesive and had lower levels of communication about problems than did their offspring. When levels of communication were related to adaptability and cohesion, it was evident for both groups that the families with high reported cohesiveness had the most positive communication patterns. Additionally, adolescents rated their families higher on communication if they also perceived a greater amount of flexibility in adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abramson, M., Ash, M. J., & Nash, W. R. (1979). Handicapped adolescents: A time for reflection.Adolescence, 14, 557–556.

  2. Alexander, B. B., Johnson, S. B., & Carter, R. C. (1984). A psychometric study of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 199–208.

  3. Barnes, H., & Olson, D. H. (1985). Parent adolescent communication and the circumplex model.Child Development, 56, 438–447.

  4. Crnic, K. A., Friedrich, W. N., & Greenberg, M. T. (1983). Adaptation of families with mentally retarded children: A model of stress, coping, and family ecology.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 125–138.

  5. Cummings, S. T. (1971). The impact of the child's deficiency on the father: A study of fathers of mentally retarded and of chronically ill children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 46, 246–255.

  6. Dusek, J. B., & Flaherty, J. F. (1981). The development of the self-concept during the adolescent years.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46, 1–61.

  7. Friedrich, W. N., & Friedrich, W. L. (1981). Comparison of psychosocial assets of parents with a handicapped child and their normal controls.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 551–553.

  8. Glass, G. V., & Stanley, J. C. (1970).Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  9. Hill, J. P. (1980). The early adolescent and the family. In theSeventy-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  10. Nihira, K., Meyers, C. E., & Mink, I. T. (1980). Home environment, family adjustment, and the development of mentally retarded children.Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 1, 5–24.

  11. Olson, D. H., McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H., Larsen, A., Muxen, M., & Wilson, M. (1982).Family inventories. St. Paul: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.

  12. Olson, D. H., Portner, J., & Lavee, Y. (1985).FACES III. St. Paul: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.

  13. Olson, D. H., Russell, C., & Sprenkle, D. (1980). Circumplex model of married and family systems: VI Theoretical update.Family Process, 22, 69–83.

  14. Rodick, J. D., Henggeler, S. W., & Hanson, C. L. (1986). An evaluation of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales and the circumplex model.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 77–87.

  15. Sigman, M. (1986). Psychotherapy with mentally retarded children and adolescents. In M. Sigman (Ed.),Children with dual disabilities: Mental retardation and emotional disorder. New York: Grune and Stratton.

  16. Steinberg, L. (1985).Adolescence. New York: A. A. Knoph.

  17. Turnbull, A. P., Summers, J. A., & Brotherson, M. J. (1986). Family life cycle: Theoretical and empirical implications and future directions for families with mentally retarded members. In J. J. Gallagher & P. M. Vietze (Eds.),Families of handicapped persons: Research programs and policy issues (pp. 45–65). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

  18. Wikler, L. M., Wasow, M., & Hatfield, E. (1981). Chronic sorrow revisited: Parent vs. professional depiction of the adjustment of parents of mentally retarded children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 63–70.

  19. Willner, S. K., & Crane, R. (1979). A parental dilemma: The child with a marginal handicap.Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 60, 30–35.

  20. Zetlin, A. G., & Turner, J. L. (1985). The transition from adolescence to adulthood: Perspectives of retarded individuals and their family.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 570–579.

  21. Zetlin, A. G., Turner, J. L., & Winik, L. (1987). Socialization effects on community adaptation of adults who have mild retardation. In S. Landesman & P. M. Vietze (Eds.),Living environments and mental retardation (pp. 293–313). Washington, DC: AAMD.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Gale M. Morrison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morrison, G.M., Zetlin, A. Perceptions of communication, cohesion, and adaptability in families of adolescents with and without learning handicaps. J Abnorm Child Psychol 16, 675–685 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00913477

Download citation

Keywords

  • Communication Pattern
  • Positive Communication
  • Similar Perspective
  • Adolescent Perspective