Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Co-creating shared realities with couples

Abstract

We are presenting a unique approach to understanding couples and relationships based on social constructionist principles. It is our belief that individuals possess constructions of reality with regard to relationships and must co-create a reality in which both partners participate. The implication of this theoretical principle is that differences between partners are not as important as the negotiation of such differences. One thousand premarital couples were examined to determine the effect of levels of flexibility and perceived differences on the quality of their relationships. Data analysis revealed that levels of flexibility were a significant factor in couples' abilities to cocreate a successful shared reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implication for clinical theory.Family Process.27, 371–393.

  2. Atwood, J., & Levine, L. (1990). The therapeutic metaphor.Australian Journal of Clinical Hypnotherapy and Hypnosis, 11, 17–40.

  3. Atwood, J., & Levine, L. (1991). Ax murders, dragons, spiders, and webs: Therapeutic metaphors for couple therapy.Contemporary Family Therapy, 13, 1–31.

  4. Bateson, G. (1972).Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballentine.

  5. Bateson, G. (1979).Mind and nature. New York: Dutton.

  6. Barker, P. (1985).Using metaphors In psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

  7. Bentler, P., & Newcomb, M. (1978). Longitudinal study of marital success and failure.Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 46, 1053–1070.

  8. Berger, P., & Kellner, H. (1964). Marriage as a construction of reality: An exercise in the microsociology of knowledge.Diogenes.46, 1–24.

  9. Berger, P.,& Luckman, T. (1966).The Social construction of reality. New York: Irvington.

  10. Bowen, M. (1976). Theory in the practice of psychotherapy. In P. Guerin (Ed.).,Family therapy: Theory and practice (pp. 42–90). New York: Gardener.

  11. Bowen, M. (1978).Family therapy in clinical practice. New York; Aronson.

  12. Buss, D. (1985). Human mate selection.American Scientist. 73, 47–51.

  13. Buss, D., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 361–377.

  14. Carter, E., & McGoldrick, M. (1981).The family life cycle. New York: Gardner.

  15. Combs, A., Richards, A.,& Richards, F. (1976).Perceptual psychology: A humanistic approach to the study of persons. New York: Harper & Row.

  16. Coopersmith, S. (1967).The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman & Co.

  17. de Shazer, S. (1985).Keys to solutions in brief therapy. New York: Norton.

  18. de Shazer, S. (1988).Clues: Investigating solutions in brief therapy. New York: Norton.

  19. de Shazer, S. (1991).Putting difference to work. New York: Norton.

  20. Duval, E. (1971).Family development. (4th Ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

  21. Ekland, B. (1982). Theories of mate selection.Social Biology, 29, 7–21.

  22. Eshelman, J., Chasion, B., & Basirico, L. (1988).Sociology: An introduction. Boston: Little, Brown.

  23. Festinger, L. (1957).Theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row & Peterson.

  24. Gergen, K. (1982).Toward transformation of knowledge. New York: Springer Verlag.

  25. Gergen, K. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology.American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.

  26. Golann, S. (1988). On second order family therapy.Family Process, 27, 51–65.

  27. Grey, J. (1992).Men are from Mars. Women are from Venus. New York: Harper Collins.

  28. Gutman, R.,& Zohar, A. (1987). Spouse similarities in personality items: Changes over years of marriage and implications for mate selection.Behavior Genetics, 17, 179–189.

  29. Haley, J. (1986).Uncommon therapy. New York: Norton.

  30. Hoffman, L. (1981).Foundations for family therapy. New York: Norton.

  31. Hoffman, L. (1985). Beyond power and control: Toward a second order family systems theory.Family Systems Medicine, 3, 381–396.

  32. Hoffman, L. (1990). Constructing realities: An art of lenses.Family Process, 29, 1–29.

  33. Holman, T., Busby, D., & Larson, J. (1989). Preparation for Marriage (PREP-M). Marriage Study Consortium.

  34. Holman, T., Busby, D., Larson, J., Klein, D., & Stahmann, R. (1992). The Preparation for Marriage Instrument: Educational, Clinical, and Research Uses. Paper presented at the Annual Conference for the National Council on Family Relations, Orlando Florida.

  35. Jones, C. (1986). Frame cultivation: Helping new meanings take root in families.The American Journal of Family Therapy, 14, 57–68.

  36. Markman, H. (1979). The application of a behavioral model of marriage in predicting relationship satisfaction of couples planning marriage,Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 743–749.

  37. Markman, H. (1991). Backwards into the future of couples therapy and couples therapy research.Journal of Family Psychology, 4, 416–425.

  38. Markman, H., Floyd, F., Stanley, S., Storaasli, R. (1988). Prevention of marital distress: A longitudinal investigation.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psvchology, 56, 210–217.

  39. Mascie-Taylor, C. (1989). Spouse similarity for IQ and personality convergence.Behavior Genetics, 19, 223–227.

  40. Mehrabian, A. (1989). Marital choice and compatibility as a function of trait similiarity-dissimiliarity.Psychological Reports, 65, 1202.

  41. Murstein, B. (1971).Theories of attraction and love. New York: Springer.

  42. Murstein, B. (1986).Paths to marriage. Beverly Hills: Sage.

  43. Napier, A. (1988).The fragile bond. New York: Harper & Row.

  44. Nock, S. (1981). The family life cycle: Empirical or conceptual?Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 15–26.

  45. Phillips, K., Fulker, D., Carey, G., & Nagoshi, C. (1988). Direct marital assortment for cognitive and personality variables.Behavior Genetics, 18, 347–356.

  46. Real, T. (1990). The therapeutic use of self in constructionist/systemic therapy.Family Process, 29, 255–272.

  47. Reiss, D. (1981).The family's construction of reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  48. Rodgers, R. (1973).Family interaction and transaction: The developmental approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  49. Satir, V. (1983).Conjoint family therapy. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

  50. Satir, V. (1988).Peoplemaking. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

  51. Solomon, A. (1986). Self acceptance and the selection of a marital partner: An assessment of the SVR model of Murstein.Social, Behavior and Personality, 14, 1–6.

  52. Steinglass, P., Bennett, L., Wolin, R., & Reiss, D. (1987).The alcoholic family. New York: Basic Books.

  53. Storaasli, R., & Markman, H. (1990). Relationship problems in early stages of marriage.Journal of Family Psychology, 4, 80–98.

  54. Stuart, R. (1980).Helping couples change. New York: Guilford.

  55. Tannen, D. (1990).You just don't understand. New York: Ballentine.

  56. Wamboldt, F., & Reiss, D. (1989). Defining a family heritage and a new relationship identity: Two central tasks in the making of a marriage.Family Process, 28, 317–336.

  57. Wamboldt, F,& Wolin, S. (1989). Reality and myth in family life: Changes across generations.Journal of Psychotherapy and the Family, 4, 141–165.

  58. Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (1974).Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.

  59. Weingarten, K. (1991). The discourses of intimacy: Adding social constructionist and feminist view.Family Process, 30, 285–306.

  60. White, S., & Hatcher, C. (1986). Couple complementarity and similarity: A review of the literature.The American Journal of Family Therapy, 12, 15–25.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Dean M. Busby PhD.

Additional information

Both authors were primary contributors to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levine, L.B., Busby, M. Co-creating shared realities with couples. Contemp Fam Ther 15, 405–421 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00892225

Download citation

Keywords

  • Data Analysis
  • Health Psychology
  • Social Issue
  • Unique Approach
  • Social Constructionist