Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Inversion of arrival-times in a region of dilatancy anisotropy

Abstract

Shear-wave splitting has been identified in many three-component seismograms from two separate field experiments on a section of the North Anatolian Fault in North-West Turkey. These observations are consistent with shear-wave propagation through a zone of extensive-dilitancy anisotropy. A preliminary attempt has been made to confirm this interpretation by simultaneously inverting suites of arrival-times for hypocentral locations and for parameters describing an anisotropic halfspace. Although the inversion procedure is not globally convergent, it is possible to recognize the true solution by systematically varying the initial conditions. Applied to selected data sets, the inversion defines several anisotropic models that fit the data significantly better than a simple isotropic model, and display the anisotropy required by the shear-wave splitting. However, most of these anisotropic models are not superior when they are used to individually locate events in a much larger data set. However, for each experiment, there is a single model that produces clearly superior locations for the larger data sets than those of other anisotropic or simple isotropic models. Both models display similar velocity variations which are characteristic of propagation through distributions of biplanar cracks displaying orthorhombic symmetry. The principal axes of the two models are oriented in similar directions and are within 20° of the principal axis of regional stress derived from fault-plane solutions. The solutions indicate low velocities close to the tensional axis, as would be expected in extensive-dilatancy anisotropy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Booth, D. C. andCrampin, S. (1985),Shear-wave polarizations on a curved wavefront at an isotropic free-surface. Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc.82, in press.

  2. Booth, D. C., Crampin, S., Evans, R. andRoberts, G. (1985),Shear-wave polarizations near the North Anatolian Fault: I, evidence for anisotropy-induced shear-wave splitting. Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc. 82, in press.

  3. Crampin, S. (1978),Seismic wave propagation through a cracked solid: polarization as a possible dilatancy diagnostic. Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc.,53, 467–496.

  4. Crampin, S. (1984),Effective elastic constants for wave propagation through cracked solids. Proc. First Int. Workshop on Seismic Anisotropy, Suzdal, 1982, (ed. Crampin, S. Hipkin, R. G. and Chesnokov, E. M.), Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc.76, 135–145.

  5. Crampin, S. andBooth, D. C. (1985),Shear-wave polarizations near the North Anatolian Fault: II, interpretation in terms of crack-induced anisotropy. Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc.82, in press.

  6. Crampin, S., Evans, R. andAtkinson, B. K. (1984),Earthquake prediction: a new physical basis. Proc. First Int. Workshop on Seismic Anisotropy, Suzdal, 1982 (ed. Crampin, S., Hipkin, R. G. and Chesnokov, E. M.), Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc.76, 147–156.

  7. Crampin, S., Evans, R., Doyle, M. andDavis, J. P. (1981),Comments on papers about shear-wave splitting in dilatancy-induced anisotropy by I. N. Gupta and by A. Ryall & W. U. Savage. Bull. seis. Soc. Am. 71, 375–377.

  8. Crampin, S., Evans, R. andÜçer, S. B. (1985),Analysis of records of local earthquakes: the Turkish Dilatancy Projects (TDP1 and TDP2). Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc.82, in press.

  9. Crampin, S., Evans, R., Üçer, S. B., Doyle, M., Davis, J. P., Yegorkina, G. V. andMiller, A. (1980),Observations of dilatancy-induced polarization anomalies and earthquake prediction, Nature286, 874–877.

  10. Crampin, S. andMcGonigle, R. (1981),The variation of delays in stress-induced polarization anomalies. Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc.64, 115–131.

  11. Crosson, R. (1976),Crustal structure modelling of earthquakes data. 1. Simultaneous least-squares estimation of hypocenter and velocity parameters. J. geophys. Res.81, 3036–3946.

  12. Doyle, M. (1981),The location of local earthquakes in a zone of anisotropy. (PhD. dissertation, University of Edinburgh).

  13. Doyle, M., McGonigle, R. andCrampin, S. (1982),The effects of crack anisotropy on the hypocentral locations of local earthquakes. Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc.69, 137–157.

  14. Evans, R., Asudeh, I., Crampin, S. andÜçer, S. B. (1985),Tectonics of the Marmara Sea region of Turkey: new evidence from microearthquake fault plane solutions. Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc., in press.

  15. Gupta, I. (1973),Premonitory variations in S-wave velocity anisotropy before earthquakes in Nevada. Science182, 1129–1132.

  16. Lee, W. andLahr, J. (1975),HYPO71 (revised): a computer program for determining hypocenter, magnitude and first motion pattern of local earthquakes. U.S.G.S., Open File Report, 75–311.

  17. McGonigle, R. andCrampin, S. (1982),A Fortran program to evaluate the phase- and group-velocity surface in an anisotropic solid. Comp. Geosci.8, 221–226.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doyle, M., Crampin, S., McGonigle, R. et al. Inversion of arrival-times in a region of dilatancy anisotropy. PAGEOPH 123, 375–387 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00880737

Download citation

Key words

  • Inversion
  • Dilatancy
  • Anisotropy
  • Local Earthquakes