Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Defenses and conservative revisions of evidential decision theories: Metatickles and ratificationism

  • 45 Accesses

  • 4 Citations

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Eells, Ellery: 1981, ‘Causality, Utility, and Decision’,Synthese 48.

  2. Eells, Ellery: 1984a, ‘Causal Decision Theory’,PSA 1984, vol. 2.

  3. Eells, Ellery: 1984b, ‘Metatickles and the Dynamics of Deliberation’,Theory and Decision,17, 71–95.

  4. Eells, Ellery and Elliott Sober: 1986, ‘Common Causes and Decision Theory’,Philosophy of Science 53, 223–45.

  5. Gibbard, Allan and William L. Harper: 1978, ‘Two Kinds of Expected Utility’, in C. Hooker et al. (eds.),Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory, vol. 1, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 125–62.

  6. Horwich, Paul: 1985, ‘Decision Theory in Light of Newcomb's Problem’,Philosophy of Science,77, 702–15.

  7. Jeffrey, Richard C.: 1965,The Logic of Decision, John Wiley, New York.

  8. Jeffrey, Richard C.: 1977, ‘A Note on the Kinematics of Preference’,Erkenntnis 11, 135–41.

  9. Jeffrey, Richard C.: 1981, ‘The Logic of Decision Defended’,Synthese 48, 473–92.

  10. Jeffrey, Richard C.: 1983,The Logic of Decision: Second Edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  11. Jeffrey, Richard C.: (forthcoming in a festschrift for Wesley Salmon) ‘How to Probabilize a Newcomb Problem’.

  12. Lewis, David: 1976, ‘Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities’,The Philosophical Review,85, 297–315.

  13. Nozick, Robert: 1969, ‘Newcomb's Problem and Two Principles of Choice’, in N. Rescher et al. (eds.),Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 114–46.

  14. Price, Huw: 1986, ‘Against Causal Decision Theory’,Synthese 67, 195–212.

  15. Rabinowicz, Włodzimierz: 1985, ‘Ratificationism Without Ratification: Jeffrey Meets Savage’,Theory and Decision,19, 171–200.

  16. Rabinowicz, Włodzimierz: 1986, ‘Ratifiability and Stability’, circulated manuscript.

  17. Sobel, Jordan Howard: 1985a, ‘Not Every Prisoner's Dilemma Is a Newcomb Problem’, in R. Campbell and L. Sowden (eds.),Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.

  18. Sobel, Jordan Howard: 1985b, ‘Circumstances and Dominance in a Causal Decision Theory’,Synthese 63, 167–202.

  19. Sobel, Jordan Howard: 1986, ‘Notes on Decision Theory: Old Wine in New Bottles’.Australasian Journal of Philosophy,64, 407–37.

  20. Sobel, Jordan Howard: 1987, ‘Self-doubts and Dutch Strategies’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy,65, 56–81.

  21. Sobel, Jordan Howard: ‘Partition-theorems for Causal Decision Theories’,Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.

  22. Sobel, Jordan Howard: forthcoming ‘Metatickles, Ratificationism, and Newcomb-like Problems without Dominance’,Proceedings of the FUR-III: Risk, Decision and Rationality, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  23. Stalnaker, Robert C.: 1972, ‘Letter to David Lewis: May 21, 1972’. in W. L. Harper et al. (eds.),Ifs: Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance, and Time, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  24. Weirich, Paul: 1986, ‘Decisions in Dynamic Settings’,PSA 1986, Volume One, pp. 438–49.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

This paper includes a revision of ‘Metatickles and Ratificationism’,PSA 1986, Volume 1, and expands two-fold upon that paper, which is confined for the most part to material presented to members of the Philosophy of Science Association at its 1986 meetings. I am grateful to Włodzimierz Rabinowicz for criticism and many useful suggestions, and, as always, to Willa Freeman-Sobel, for her valuable comments on every draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sobel, J.H. Defenses and conservative revisions of evidential decision theories: Metatickles and ratificationism. Synthese 75, 107–131 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873276

Download citation

Keywords

  • Decision Theory
  • Evidential Decision
  • Evidential Decision Theory
  • Conservative Revision