Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 89–94 | Cite as

An integrative descriptive model of ethical decision making

  • Kelly C. Strong
  • G. Dale Meyer


This paper presents an integrative, descriptive model of ethical decision making, with special attention given to issues of measurement. After building the model, hypotheses are developed from a portion of it. These hypotheses are tested in an exploratory analysis to determine if further research and testing of this model and the measurement instruments it employs are warranted.


Decision Making Economic Growth Exploratory Analysis Descriptive Model Ethical Decision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aupperle, K.E., A. B. Carrolla and J. D. Hatfield: 1985, ‘An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability’,Academy of Management Journal 28, pp. 446–463Google Scholar
  2. Baron, J.: 1988,Thinking and Deciding (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  3. Beyer, J. M.: 1981, ‘Ideologies, Values and Decision Making in Organizations’, in P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck, eds.,Handbook of Organizational Design (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 166–202.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, A. B.: 1979, ‘A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance’,Academy of Management Review 4, pp. 497–505.Google Scholar
  5. Dawes, R.: 1988,Rational Choice in an Uncertain World (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, San Diego).Google Scholar
  6. Derry, R.: 1987, ‘Moral Reasoning in Work-Related Conflicts’, in W. C. Frederick, ed.,Research in Corporate Social Performance (JAI Press), Vol. 9, pp. 25–49.Google Scholar
  7. Fritsche, D.J. and H. Becker: 1984, ‘Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy: An Empirical Investigation’,Academy of Management Journal 27, pp. 166–175.Google Scholar
  8. Gilligan, C.: 1982,In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
  9. Gilligan, C.: 1988, ‘Mapping the Moral Domain: A Contribution of Women's Thinking to Psychological Theory and Education’, in Gilligan, Ward, Taylor, and Bardige, eds. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
  10. Grimm, P. F., L. Kohlberg and S. H. White: 1968, ‘Some Relationships Between Conscience and Attentional Processes’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8(3), pp. 239–252.Google Scholar
  11. Hensen, G. S. and B. Wernerfelt: 1989, ‘Determinants of Firm Performance: The Relative Importance of Economic and Organizational Factors’,Strategic Management Journal 10, pp. 399–411.Google Scholar
  12. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1979, ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk’,Econometrica 47, pp. 263–291.Google Scholar
  13. Kohlberg, L.: 1963, ‘The Development of Children's Orientations Toward a Moral Order. I. Sequence in the Development of Human Thought’,Vita Humana 6, pp. 11–33.Google Scholar
  14. Kohlberg, L.: 1970, ‘Stages of Moral Development as a Basis for Moral Education’, in C. Beck and E. Sullivan, eds.,Moral Education (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), pp. 23–92.Google Scholar
  15. Lichtenstein, S. and P. Slovic: 1971, ‘Reversal of Preferences between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decision’,Journal of Experimental Psychology 89, pp. 46–55.Google Scholar
  16. Michalos, A. C.: 1978,Foundations of Decision-Making (Canadian Library of Philosophy, Ottawa).Google Scholar
  17. Rest, J.: 1986,Manual for the Defining Issues Test (Center for the Study of Ethical Development, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
  18. Slovic, P. and B. Fischhoff: 1977, ‘On the Psychology of Experimental Surprises’,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3, pp. 544–551.Google Scholar
  19. Trevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’,Academy of Management Review 11, pp. 601–617.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly C. Strong
    • 1
  • G. Dale Meyer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Colorado-BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations