Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Board composition and corporate philanthropy

  • 1093 Accesses

  • 183 Citations

Abstract

Using agency theory, this study empirically examined the relationship between board composition and corporate philanthropy. Generally, the ratio of insiders to outsiders, the percentage of insider stock ownership, and the proportion of female and minority board members were found to be positively and significantly associated with firms' charitable contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alexander, G. and R. Bucholtz: 1978, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance’,Academy of Management Journal 21, 479–486.

  2. Arlow, P. and M. Gannon: 1982, ‘Social Responsiveness, Corporate Structure, and Economic Performance’,Academy of Management Review 7, 235–241.

  3. Atkinson, L. and J. Galaskiewicz: 1988, ‘Stock Ownership and Company Contributions to Charity’,Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 82–100.

  4. Bacon, J. and J. F. Brown: 1973,Corporate Directorship Prices: Role, Selection, and Legal Status of the Board (New York: The Conference Board, Inc.).

  5. Baysinger, B. D. and H. D. Butler: 1985, ‘Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition’,Journal of Law Economics and Organizations 1, 101–124.

  6. Baysinger, B. D. and R. E. Hoskisson: 1990, ‘The Composition of Boards of Directors and Srategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy’,Academy of Management Review 15, 72–87.

  7. Chaganti, R. S., V. Mahajan and S. Sharma: 1985, ‘Corporate Board Size, Composition, and Corporate Failures in Retailing Industry’,Journal of Management Studies 22, 400–417.

  8. Cochran, P. L., R. A. Wood and T. B. Jones: 1985, ‘The Composition of Boards of Directors and Incidence of Golden Parachutes’,Academy of Management Journal 28, 664–671.

  9. Cornell, B. and A. Shapiro: 1987, ‘Corporate Stakeholder and Corporate Finance’,Financial Management 16, 5–14.

  10. Drucker, P. E.: 1973,Management: Tasks, Responsibility, Practices (New York, Harper & Row Publishers).

  11. Eisenhardt, K. M.: 1989, ‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review’,Academy of Management Review 14, 57–74.

  12. Elgart, L. D.: 1983, ‘Women on Fortune 500 boards’,California Management Review 24, 121–127.

  13. Fama, E. F.: 1980, ‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’,Journal of Political Economy 88, 288–307.

  14. Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen: 1983a, ‘Agency Problems and Residual Claims’,Journal of Law and Economics 26, 327–349.

  15. Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen: 1983b, ‘Separation of Ownership and Control’,Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301–325.

  16. Freeman, R. E.: 1984,Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Boston: Ballinger).

  17. Harrigan, K. R.: 1981, ‘Numbers and Positions of Women Elected to Corporate Boards’,Academy of Management Journal 24, 619–625.

  18. Jensen, M. C.: 1986, ‘Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers’,American Economic Review 76, 323–329.

  19. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling: 1976, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure’,Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360.

  20. Johnson, E. W.: 1990, ‘An Insider's Call for Outside Direction’,Harvard Business Review 68(2), 46–55.

  21. Kesner, I. F.: 1988, ‘Directors' Characteristics and Committee Membership: An Investigation of Type, Occupation, Tenure, and Gender’,Academy of Management Journal 31, 66–84.

  22. Kesner, I. F., B. Victor and B. T. Lamont: 1986, ‘Board Composition and the Commission of Illegal Acts: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies’,Academy of Management Journal 29, 789–799.

  23. Kosnik, R. D.: 1987, ‘Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate Governance’,Administrative Science Quarterly 32, 163–185.

  24. Lambert, R. A., D. F. Larcker and T. Lys: 1985, ‘Takeover resistance, managerial incentives, and shareholder wealth’ (unpublished manuscript, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania).

  25. Lorsch, J. W. and E. MacIver: 1990,Pawns or potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).

  26. Mace, M. L.: 1972, ‘The President and the Board of Directors’,Harvard Business Review 50(12), 37–49.

  27. McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis: 1988, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance’,Academy of Management Journal 31, 854–872.

  28. Neff, T.: 1989, ‘Let Directors be Directors’,Wall Street Journal, December 11, 14.

  29. Neter, J., W. Wasserman and M. H. Kutner: 1985,Applied Linear Statistical Models (Homewood, Illinois: Irwin).

  30. Parket, R. and H. Eibert: 1975, ‘Social Responsibility: The Underlying Factors,Business Horizons 18, 5–10.

  31. Pfeffer, J.: 1972, ‘Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment,Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 218–228.

  32. Schwartz, F. N.: 1980, ‘“Invisible’ Resource: Women for Boards’,Harvard Business Review 58, 6–18.

  33. Singh, H. and F. Harianto: 1989, ‘Management-board Relationships, Takeover Risk, and the Adoption of Golden Parachutes’,Academy of Management Journal 32, 7–24.

  34. Stultz, J. E.: 1979, ‘Madam Director’,Directors and Boards 3(4), 6–19.

  35. Ullmann, A.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance’,Academy of Management Review 10, 540–577.

  36. Vance, S. C.: 1964,Boards of directors: Structure and Performance (Eugene, Or: University of Oregon Press).

  37. Vance, S. C.: 1983,Corporate Leadership: Boards, Directors, and Strategy (New York: McGraw-Hill).

  38. Williams, H. M. and I. S. Shapiro: 1979,Power and Accountability: The Changing Role of the Corporate Boards of Directors (New York: Carnegie-Mellon University Press).

  39. Zahra, S. A. and J. A. Pearce II: 1989, ‘Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integration Model’,Journal of Management 15, 291–334.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Jia Wang received his Ph.D. from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. He is an associate professor of management at California State University at Fresno. His current research interests include corporate governance and corporate social performance.

Betty S. Coffey is an assistant professor of management at Appalachian State University. Her research interests are in the area of corporate social performance and functional level strategic management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, J., Coffey, B.S. Board composition and corporate philanthropy. J Bus Ethics 11, 771–778 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872309

Download citation

Keywords

  • Economic Growth
  • Board Member
  • Agency Theory
  • Corporate Philanthropy
  • Charitable Contribution