Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

What model theoretic semantics cannot do?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. [1]

    Bach, Emmon: 1968, ‘Nouns and Noun Phrases,’ in Emmon Bach, and R. T. Harms (eds.),Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York.

  2. [2]

    Cresswell, M. J.: 1973,Logics and Languages, Methuen, London.

  3. [3]

    Cresswell, M. J.: 1978, ‘Semantic Competence,’ in M. Guenthner Ruetter and F. Guenthner (eds.),Meaning and Translation, Duckworth, London.

  4. [4]

    Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘Truth and Meaning,’Synthese 17, 304–323.

  5. [5]

    Davidson, D.: 1973, ‘In Defense of Convention T,’ in H. LeBlanc (ed.),Truth Syntax and Modality, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

  6. [6]

    Dummett, M.: 1975, ‘What is a Theory of Meaning (pt. I)?,’ inMind and Language, ed. S. Guttenplan, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  7. [7]

    Fodor, J. A.: 1975,Language of Thought, Crowell, New York.

  8. [8]

    Fodor, J. D.: 1977,Semantics: Theories of Meaning in Generative Grammar, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  9. [9]

    Harman G.: 1974, ‘Meaning and Semantics,’ in M. K. Munitz and P. Unger (eds.),Semantics and Philosophy, New York Univ. Press, New York.

  10. [10]

    Hintikka, J.: 1969, ‘Semantics for Propositional Attitudes,’ in Davis, J. et al. (eds.),Philosophical Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  11. [11]

    Hintikka, J. and Carlson, L.: 1979, ‘Conditionals, Generic Quantifiers and Other Applications of Subgames,’ inMeaning and Use, Avishai Margalit (ed.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  12. [12]

    Jackendoff, R.: 1972,Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

  13. [13]

    Katz, J.: 1966,The Philosophy of Language, Harper, New York.

  14. [14]

    Katz, J.: 1972,Semantic Theory, Harper, New York.

  15. [15]

    Katz, J.: 1975, Logic and Language: An Examination of Recent Criticisms of Intensionalism,’ in Gunderson, K. (ed.),Language, Mind and Knowledge, Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

  16. [16]

    Katz, J. and Fodor, J. A.: 1963, ‘The Structure of a Semantic Theory,’Language 39, 170–210.

  17. [17]

    Katz, J. and Nagel, R.: 1974, ‘Meaning Postulates and Semantic Theory,’Foundations of Language 11, 311–340.

  18. [18]

    Katz, J. and Postal, P.: 1964,An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Description, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  19. [19]

    Kripke, S.: 1963, ‘Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic. I. Normal Propositional Calculi,’Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik 9, 67–96.

  20. [20]

    Kripke, S.: 1963, ‘Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic,’Acta Philosophica Fennica 16, 83–94.

  21. [21]

    Lakoff, G.: 1972, ‘Linguistics and Natural Logic,’ in G. Harman and D. Davidson (eds.),Semantics for Natural Languages, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  22. [22]

    LePore, Ernest: 1982, ‘In Defense of Davidson,’Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 277–294.

  23. [23]

    LePore, Ernest and Loewer, B.: 1981, ‘Translational Semantics,’Synthese 48, 121–133.

  24. [24]

    Lewis, D.: 1972, ‘General Semantics,’ inSemantics for Natural Language [see 21].

  25. [25]

    Lewis, D.: 1973,Counterfactuals, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  26. [26]

    Lyons, J.: 1968,Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

  27. [27]

    McCawley, J.: 1968, ‘The Role of Semantics in Grammar,’ inUniversals in Linguistic Theory [see 1].

  28. [28]

    McCawley, J.: 1971, ‘Where Do Noun Phrases Come From?,’ in Steinberg, J. and Jackobovits, L. (eds.),Semantics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

  29. [29]

    Montague, R.: ‘English as a Formal Language,’ in [37].

  30. [30]

    Montague, R.: ‘Universal Grammar,’ in [37].

  31. [31]

    Montague, R.: ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English,’ in [37].

  32. [32]

    Partee, B.: 1975, ‘Montague Grammar and Transformational Grammar,’ inLinguistic Inquiry 6, 203–300.

  33. [33]

    Potts, T.: 1975, ‘Model Theory and Linguistics,’ inFormal Semantics for Natural Language, ed. Keenan, E., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

  34. [34]

    Saarinen, E.: 1977, ‘Game-Theoretical Semantics,’Monist 60, 406–18.

  35. [35]

    Stalnaker, R.: 1972, ‘Pragmatics,’ inSemantics of Natural Language [see 21].

  36. [36]

    Tarski, A.: 1956, ‘The Concept of Truth in the Languages of the Deductive Sciences,’ inLogic, Semantics, and Matamathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  37. [37]

    Thomason, R. (ed.): 1974,Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, Conn.

  38. [38]

    van Fraassen, B. C.: 1969, ‘Presuppositions, Supervaluations and Free Logic,’ in Lambert, K. (ed.),The Logical Way of Doing Things, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, Conn.

  39. [39]

    Vermazen, B.: 1967, ‘Review of (13) and (18),’Synthese 17, 350–365.

  40. [40]

    Hintikka, J.: ‘Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages,’ forthcoming.

  41. [41]

    Katz, J.: 1977, ‘The Advantage of Semantic Theory over Predicate Calculus in the Representation of Logical Form in Natural Language,’Monist 60, 380–405.

  42. [42]

    Partee, Barbara: 1980, ‘Montague Grammar, Mental Representation, and Reality’,Midwest Studies in Philosophy.

  43. [43]

    Partee, Barbara: 1977, ‘Possible World Semantics and Linguistic Theory,’Monist 60, 303–26.

  44. [44]

    Field, Hartry: 1973, ‘Tarski's Theory of Truth,’Journal of Philosophy 69, 347–75.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

The idea for this paper derives from some comments Donald Davidson has made on model-theoretic semantics in several of his papers. I would like to thank him and John Wallace. I would also like to thank Bill Lycan, Paul Yu and John Biro for comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lepore, E. What model theoretic semantics cannot do?. Synthese 54, 167–187 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869390

Download citation


  • Model Theoretic Semantic
  • Theoretic Semantic