Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Effects of cueing on visuospatial processing in unilateral spatial neglect

  • 55 Accesses

  • 25 Citations

Abstract

Patients with typical left unilateral spatial neglect bisected lines after cueing to the left end-point, the fixation point being monitored with an eye camera. They persisted with the point of initial fixation made after cueing and placed the mark there without searching leftwards again. The rightward shift of fixation to the initial point of fixation thus determined the location of the subjective midpoint. We consider that rightward attentional bias increased the amplitude of this shift that was planned on the basis of the perception of the whole line while cueing. This hypothesis may explain smaller but obvious rightward bisection errors found in the cueing condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Albert ML (1973) A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 23: 658–664

  2. 2.

    Bisiach E, Capitani E, Colombo A, Spinnler H (1976) Having a horizontal segment: a study on hemisphere-damaged patients with focal cerebral lesions. Arch Suisses Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr 118: 199–206

  3. 3.

    Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC, Nathan G, Wilson L (1985) Bisecting rods and lines: effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left-side underestimation by normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 23: 421–425

  4. 4.

    De Renzi E, Gentilini M, Faglioni P, Barbieri C (1989) Attentional shift towards the rightmost stimuli in patients with left visual neglect. Cortex 25: 231–237

  5. 5.

    Friedland RP, Weinstein EA (1977) Hemi-inattention and hemisphere specialization: introduction and historical review. In: Weinstein EA, Friedland RP (eds) Advances in neurology, vol 18. Hemi-inattention and hemisphere specialization. Raven Press, New York, pp 1–31

  6. 6.

    Girotti F, Casazza M, Musicco M, Avanzini G (1983) Oculomotor disorders in cortical lesions in man: the role of unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 21: 543–553

  7. 7.

    Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1988) How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex 24: 321–328

  8. 8.

    Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1989) Two techniques for the assessment of line bisection in visuo-spatial neglect: a single case study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52: 1300–1302

  9. 9.

    Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1991) Recovery and regression in visuo-spatial neglect: a case study of leaming in line bisection. Brain Inj 5: 23–31

  10. 10.

    Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1992) Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity? Cortex 28: 525–535

  11. 11.

    Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Wade DT (1990) Do visual field deficits exacerbate visuo-spatial neglect? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53: 487–491

  12. 12.

    Heilman KM, Valenstein E (1979) Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Ann Neurol 5: 166–170

  13. 13.

    Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E (1985) Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E (eds) Clinical neuropsychology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 243–293

  14. 14.

    Ishiai S, Furukawa T, Tsukagoshi H (1987) Eye-fixation patterns in homonymous hemianopia and unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 25: 675–679

  15. 15.

    Ishiai S, Furukawa T, Tsukagoshi H (1989) Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect. Brain 112: 1485–1502

  16. 16.

    Ishiai S, Sugishita M, Odajima N, Yaginuma M, Gono S, Kamaya T (1990) Improvement of unilateral spatial neglect with numbering. Neurology 40: 1395–1398

  17. 17.

    Ishiai S, Sugishita M, Mitani K, Ishizawa M (1992) Leftward search in left unilateral spatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55: 40–44

  18. 18.

    Ishiai S, Sugishita M, Watabiki S, Nakayama T, Kotera M, Gono S (1994) Improvement of left unilateral spatial neglect in a line extension task. Neurology 44: 294–298

  19. 19.

    Kinsboume M (1987) Mechanisms of unilateral neglect. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 69–86

  20. 20.

    Làdavas E, Petronio A, Umiltà C (1990) The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients. Cortex 26: 307–317

  21. 21.

    Manning L, Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1990) Individual variation in line bisection: a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 28: 647–655

  22. 22.

    Mark VW, Kooistra CA, Heilman KM (1988) Hemispatial neglect affected by non-neglected stimuli. Neurology 38: 1207–1211

  23. 23.

    Mesulam M-M (1985) Attention, confusional states, and neglect. In: Mesulam M-M (ed) Principles of behavioral neurology. Davis, Philadelphia, pp 125–168

  24. 24.

    Milner AD, Brechmann M, Pagliarini L (1992) To halve and to halve not: an analysis of line bisection judgment in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 30: 515–526

  25. 25.

    Nichelli P, Rinaldi M (1989) Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain Cogn 9: 57–70

  26. 26.

    Posner MI, Walker JA, Friedrich FJ, Rafal RD (1984) Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci 4: 1863–1874

  27. 27.

    Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW (1983) The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 21: 589–599

  28. 28.

    Rizzolatti G, Gallese V (1988) Mechanisms and theories of spatial neglect. In: Boller F, Grafman J (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 223–246

  29. 29.

    Scarisbrick DJ, Tweedy JR, Kuslansky G (1987) Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection. Neuropsychologia 25: 695–699

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Sumio Ishiai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishiai, S., Seki, K., Koyama, Y. et al. Effects of cueing on visuospatial processing in unilateral spatial neglect. J Neurol 242, 367–373 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868391

Download citation

Key words

  • Unilateral spatial neglect
  • Line bisection test
  • Cueing
  • Eye-fixation pattern