Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The competition controversy in community ecology

  • 273 Accesses

  • 15 Citations

Abstract

There is a long history of controversy in ecology over the role of competition in determining patterns of distribution and abundance, and over the significance of the mathematical modeling of competitive interactions. This paper examines the controversy. Three kinds of considerations have been involved at one time or another during the history of this debate. There has been dispute about the kinds of regularities ecologists can expect to find, about the significance of evolutionary considerations for ecological inquiry, and about the empirical credentials of theoretical studies of competition. Each of these elements is examined with an eye toward gaining philosophical clarification of the issues involved. In the process, certain shortcomings of contemporary philosophical theories are revealed. In particular, I argue that plausibility arguments based on background considerations are an important part of the model building tradition, but that current accounts of the structure and evaluation of scientific theories do little to illuminate this side of theoretical ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abrams, P.A.: 1975, ‘Limiting Similarity and the Form of the Competition Coefficient’,Theoretical Population Biology 8, 356–375.

  2. Abrams, P.A.: 1980, ‘Are Competition Coefficients Constant? Inductive yersus Deductive Approaches’,American Naturalist 116, 730–735.

  3. Abrams, P.A.: 1987, ‘On Classifying Interactions Between Populations’,Oecologia 73, 272–281.

  4. Andrewartha, H.G. and Birch, L.C.: 1954,The Distribution and Abundance of Animals, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

  5. Andrewartha, H.G. and Birch, L.C.: 1984,The Ecological Web, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

  6. Cartwright, N.: 1983,How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  7. Cody, M.L. and Diamond, J.M., eds.: 1975,Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  8. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, Vol. XXII (1958).

  9. Colwell, R.K.: 1984, ‘What's New? Community Ecology Discovers Biology’, in Price, P.W., Slobodchikoff, C.N. and Gaud, W.S. (eds.),A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems, Wiley, New York, pp. 387–396.

  10. Connell, J.H.: 1980, ‘Diversity and the Coevolution of Competitors; or, the Ghost of Competition Past’,Oikos 35, 131–138.

  11. Cooper, G.: 1988, ‘Fitness and Explanation’, in Fine A. and Leplin J. (eds.),PSA 1988 1, 207–215.

  12. Cooper, G.: 1989,Ecology and Evolution, A Philosophical Study, PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.

  13. Cooper, G.: 1990, ‘The Explanatory Tools of Theoretical Population Biology’, in Fine A., Forbes M., and Wessels L. (eds.),PSA 1990 1, 165–178.

  14. Diamond, J. and Case, T., eds.: 1986,Community Ecology, Harper and Row, New York.

  15. Fenchel, T.: 1975, ‘Character Displacement and Coexistence in Mud Snails (Hydrobiidae)’,Oecologia 20, 19–32.

  16. Greenwoord, P.J., Harvey, P.H. and Slatkin, M. (eds.): 1985,Evolution, Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

  17. Haila, Y.: 1988, ‘The Multiple Faces of Ecological Theory and Data’,Oikos 53, 408–410.

  18. Haila, Y. and Jarvinnen, O.: 1980, ‘The Role of Theoretical Concepts in Understanding the Ecological Theatre: A Case Study in Island Biogeography’, in Saarinen (1980).

  19. Howard, L.O. and Fiske, W.F.: 1911, ‘The Importation into the United States of the Parasites of the Gipsy Moth and the Brown Tail Moth’, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology. Bulletin no. 91, reprinted New York: Arno Press, 1977.

  20. Hutchinson, G.E.: 1958, ‘Concluding Remarks’, in Cold Spring Harbor (1958).

  21. Hutchinson, G.E.: 1978,An Introduction to Population Ecology, Yale University Press, New Haven.

  22. Kingsland, S.: 1985,Modeling Nature, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

  23. Kingsland, S.: 1986, ‘Mathematical Figments, Biological Facts: Population Ecology in the Thirties’,Journal of the History of Biology 19, 235–256.

  24. Kitcher, P.: 1981, ‘Explanatory Unification’,Philosophy of Science 48, 507–531.

  25. Kitcher, P.: 1985a, ‘Two Approaches to Explanation’,Journal of Philosophy LXXXII, 632–639.

  26. Kitcher, P.: 1985b,Vaulting Ambition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  27. Kitcher, P.: 1989, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in Kitcher and Salmon (1989).

  28. Kitcher, P. and Salmon, W.C.: 1989,Scientific Explanation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

  29. Lack, D.: 1954,The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

  30. Levins, R.: 1966, ‘The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology’,American Scientist 54, 421–431.

  31. Levins, R.: 1968,Evolution in Changing Environments, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

  32. Lewontin, R.C.: 1974,The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

  33. Lewontin, R.C.: 1980, ‘Theoretical Population Genetics in the Evolutionary Synthesis’, in Mayr and Provine (1980).

  34. Lewontin, R.C.: 1985, ‘Population Genetics’, in Greenwood et al. (1985).

  35. MacArthur, R.H.: 1957, ‘On the Relative Abundance of Bird Species’,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences 43: 293–295.

  36. MacArthur, R.H.: 1972,Geographical Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

  37. MacArthur, R.H. and Levins, R.: 1967, ‘The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species’,American Naturalist 101, 377–385.

  38. May, R.M.: 1973,Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

  39. May, R.M.: 1977, ‘Mathematical Models and Ecology: Past and Future’, in Goulden (1977).

  40. May, R.M.: 1981,Theoretical Ecology, Sinauer and Assoc., Sunderland, Mass.

  41. Mayr, E.: 1963,Animal Species and Evolution, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  42. Nicholson, A.J.: 1933, ‘The Balance of Animal Populations’,Journal of Animal Ecology 2, 132–178.

  43. Nicholson, A.J.: 1954, ‘An Outline of the Dynamics of Animal Populations’,Australian Journal of Zoology 2, 9–65.

  44. Nicholson, A.J.: 1960, ‘The Role of Population Dynamics in Natural Selection’, in Tax (1960).

  45. Nicholson, A.J. and Bailey, V.A.: 1935, ‘The Balance of Animal Populations’,Proceeding of the Zoological Society of London, part three, 551–598.

  46. Orians, G.H.: 1962, ‘Natural Selection and Ecological Theory’,American Naturalist 96, 257–264.

  47. Ospovat, D.: 1981,The Development of Darwin's Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology, and Natural Selection, 1838–1859, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  48. Pianka, E.: 1981, ‘Competition and Niche Theory’, in May (1981).

  49. Pielou, E.C.: 1977,Mathematical Ecology, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

  50. Popper, K.: 1959,The Logic of Scienfic Discovery, Harper and Row, New York.

  51. Prout, T.: 1965, ‘The Estimation of Fitness from Genotypic Frequencies’,Evolution 19, 546–551.

  52. Pulliam, H.R.: 1975, ‘Coexistence of Sparrows: A Test of Competition Theory’,Science 189, 474–76.

  53. Richards, O.: 1928, ‘The Growth of the YeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae. I. The Growth Curve, Its Mathematical Analysis, and the Effect of Temperature on the Yeast Growth’,Annals of Botany 42, 271–283.

  54. Roughgarden, J.: 1984, ‘Competition and Theory in Community Ecology’, in Salt (1984).

  55. Roughgarden, J.: 1986, ‘A Comparison of Food Limited and Space Limited Animal Competition Communities’, in Diamond and Case (1986).

  56. Roughgarden, J. and Diamond, J.: 1986, ‘Overview: The Role of Species Interactions in Community Ecology’, in Diamond and Case (1986).

  57. Saarinen, E. (ed.): 1980,Conceptual Issues in Ecology, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  58. Salmon, W.: 1984,Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

  59. Salmon, W.: 1985, ‘Conflicting Conceptions of Scientific Explanation’,Journal of Philosophy LXXXII, 651–654.

  60. Salt, G., ed.: 1984,Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  61. Schoener, T.: 1986a, ‘Mechanistic Approaches to Community Ecology: A New Reductionism?’,American Zoologist 26, 74–100.

  62. Schoener, T.: 1986b, ‘Overview: Kinds of Ecological Communities — Ecology Becomes Pluralistic’, in Diamond and Case (1986).

  63. Simberloff, D.: 1984, ‘Competition Theory, Hypothesis Testing, and other Community Ecological Buzzwords’, in Salt (1984).

  64. Simberloff, D. and Boecklen, W.: 1981 ‘Santa Rosalia Reconsidered’,Evolution 35, 1206–1228.

  65. Sloep, P.: 1986, ‘Null Hypotheses in Ecology: Towards the Dissolution of a Controversy’, in Fine, A. and Machmer, P. (eds.),PSA 1986 1, 307–313.

  66. Strong, D., Simberloff, D., Abele, L. and Thistle, A., eds.: 1984,Ecological Communities, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

  67. Tax, S., ed.: 1960,Evolution After Darwin, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  68. Werner, E.: 1984, ‘The Mechanisms of Species Interactions and Community Organization in Fish’, in Strong, et al. (1984)

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, G. The competition controversy in community ecology. Biol Philos 8, 359–384 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857684

Download citation

Key words

  • Ecology
  • evolution
  • competition
  • theory testing
  • modeling