Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Relative effectiveness of methods of breast self-examination

  • 49 Accesses

  • 10 Citations

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of different methods of breast self-examination (BSE) on coverage of breast area and lump detection, using a factorial design, pairing three search patterns (concentric circle, radial spoke, vertical strip) with two finger palpation techniques (small circular movements, sliding movements). Ninety-seven female undergraduates were randomly assigned to one of six BSE training conditions which were identical except in the BSE search pattern and finger palpation technique explained by the instructor. Following the 20-min, small-group training, subjects' coverage of breast area was assessed by scoring their BSE performance on a breast board. Lump detection was determined by the number of lumps correctly identified in silicone breast models. Results indicated that the vertical strip pattern was associated with significantly greater coverage of the breast area. There were no significant differences in lump detection; however, the sliding finger palpation technique resulted in significantly more false identifications of lumps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Cancer Society (1987). Special touch: A personal plan of action for breast health, 87-1MM-No. 2095-LE.

  2. American Cancer Society (1989). Cancer statistics, 1989.Ca Cancer J. Clin. 39: 3–21.

  3. Baines, C. J. (1987). Breast palpation technique: What is the finger pad?J. Chron. Dis. 40(4): 361–362.

  4. Diem, G., and Rose, D. P. (1985). Has breast self-examination had a fair trial?N.Y. State J. Med. 85(8): 479–480.

  5. Duer, J. D., and Santurri, D. A. (1984a). Group vs. individual training of breast self-examination. Poster presented at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

  6. Duer, J. D., and Santurri, D. A. (1984b). The effects of breast self-examination procedures on bilateral transfer of skill. Poster presented at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

  7. Feldman, J. G., Carter, A. C., Nicastri, A. D., and Hosat, S. T. (1981). Breast self-examination, relationship to stage of breast cancer at diagnosis.Cancer 47: 2740–2745.

  8. Foster, R. S., Jr., and Costanza, M. C. (1984). Breast self-examination practices and breast cancer survival.Cancer 53: 999–1005.

  9. Foster, R. S., Jr., Lang, S. P., Costanza, M. C., Worden, J. K., Haines, C. R., and Yates, J. W. (1978). Breast self-examination practices and breast-cancer stage.N. Engl. J. Med. 299: 265–270.

  10. O'Malley, M. S., and Fletcher, S. W. (1987). Screening for breast cancer with breast self-examination: A critical review.JAMA 257: 2196–2203.

  11. Pennypacker, H. S., Bloom, H. S., Criswell, E. L., Neelakantan, P., Goldstein, M. K., and Stein, G. H. (1982). Toward an effective technology in breast self-examination.Int. J. Ment. Health 11: 98–116.

  12. Saunders, K. J., Pilgrim, C. A., and Pennypacker, H. S. (1986). Increased proficiency of search in breast self-examination.Cancer 58: 2531–2537.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Laura J. Solomon.

Additional information

This research was funded by the Vermont Regional Cancer Center.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atkins, E., Solomon, L.J., Worden, J.K. et al. Relative effectiveness of methods of breast self-examination. J Behav Med 14, 357–367 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845112

Download citation

Key words

  • breast self-examination
  • cancer
  • early detection