Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 86, Issue 5, pp 567–572 | Cite as

Brassica carinata resynthesized by protoplast fusion

  • P. Jourdan
  • E. Salazar
Article

Abstract

Brassica carinata (bbcc) was resynthesized by protoplast fusion betweenB. nigra (bb) andB. oleracea (cc). In two fusion experiments 64 hybrid plants were obtained and identified to be true hybrids by isoenzyme analysis, nuclear DNA content, chromosome number, and intermediate morphology. Of these plants 56% were normal amphidiploids with 2n=34 chromosomes and a DNA content equivalent to that of naturalB. carinata. The remaining plants were polyploid, morphologically abnormal, and infertile. The majority of the hybrids contained both chloroplasts and mitochondria fromB. nigra, but some plants combined chloroplast and mitochondria from the different progenitors. Hybrids with a DNA content equivalent to that ofB. carinata had a wide range of male fertility (4–98%), but consistently low female fertility. Only a few selfed seed were produced, but these germinated and grew into vigorous plants.

Key words

Amphidiplids Brassica carinata Interspecific hybridization Protoplast fusion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anand IJ, Sing JP, Malik RS (1985)B. carinata — A potential oilseed crop for rainfed agriculture. Cruciferae Newsl 10:76–79Google Scholar
  2. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED (1991) Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9:229–241Google Scholar
  3. Campbell CT, Seguin-Wartz G, Prakash S (1990) Production of synthetic genotypes ofB. juncea via interspecific and somatic hybridization. In: Proc 6th Crucifer Genet Workshop. Cornell University USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva N.Y., p 18Google Scholar
  4. Chevre AM, Delourme R, Eber F, Arus P, Quiros CF (1990) Allele nomenclature for five isozyme systems inBrassica Nigra, Brassica campestris andBrassica oleracea. In: Proc 6th Crucifer Genet Workshop. Cornell University USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Geneva, N.Y. p 19Google Scholar
  5. Doyle JJ, Dickson EE (1987) Preservation of plant samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. Taxon 36:715–722Google Scholar
  6. Hogenboom NG (1984) Incongruity: non-functioning of intercellular and intracellular partner relationships through nonmatching information. In: Linskens HF, Heslop-Harrison J (eds) Cellular interactions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 640–654Google Scholar
  7. Jourdan PS, Earle ED, Mutschler MA (1989) Synthesis of malesterile, triazine-resistantBrassica napus by somatic hybridization between cytoplasmic male sterileB. oleracea and atrazine-resistantB. campestris. Theor Appl Genet 78:445–455Google Scholar
  8. Kemble RJ, Barsby TL (1988) Use of protoplast fusion systems to study organelle genetics in a commercially important crop. Biochem Cell Biol 665–676Google Scholar
  9. Kolte SJ (1985) Diseases of annual edible oilseed crops, vol II: rapeseed mustard and sesame diseases. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 9–82Google Scholar
  10. Kräling K (1987) Utilization of genetic variability of resynthesized rapeseed. Plant Breed 99:209–217Google Scholar
  11. Landgren M, Glimelius K (1990) Analysis of chloroplast and mitochondrial segregation in three different combinations of somatic hybrids produced withinBrassicaceae. Theor Appl Genet 80:776–784Google Scholar
  12. Mizushima U, Katsuo K (1953) On the fertility of artificial amphidiploid betweenBrassica nigra Koch. andB. oleracea L. Tohoku J Agric Res 4:1–14Google Scholar
  13. Ozminkowski RH (1992) Comparison of sexual and somatic interspecific hybridization inBrassica. Phd thesis, The Ohio State University, Akron, OhioGoogle Scholar
  14. Ozminkowski RH, Jourdan PS (1993) Expression of self-incompatibility and fertility ofBrassica napus L. resynthesized by interspecific somatic hybridization. Euphytica 65:153–160Google Scholar
  15. Prakash S, Hinata K (1980) Taxonomy, cytogenetics and origin of cropBrassicas, a review. Opera Bot 55:1–57Google Scholar
  16. Prakash S, Gupta S, Raut RN, Kalra A (1984) SyntheticBrassica carinata — a preliminary report. Cruciferae Newsl 9:36–37Google Scholar
  17. Robertson D, Palmer JD, Earle ED, Mutschler MA (1987) Analysis of organelle genomes in a somatic hybrid derived from cytoplasmic male-sterileBrassica oleracea and atrazine-resistantB. campestris. Theor Appl Genet 74:303–309Google Scholar
  18. Rosén B, Halldén D, Heneen K (1988) DiploidBrassica napus somatic hybrids: characterization of nuclear and organellar DNA. Theor Appl Genet 76:197–203Google Scholar
  19. Sarla N, Raut RN (1988) Synthesis ofBrassica carinata fromBrassica nigra xBrassica oleracea hybrids obtained by ovary culture. Theor Appl Genet 76:846–849Google Scholar
  20. Sundberg E, Glimelius K (1986) A method for production of interspecific hybrids withinBrassicaceae via somatic hybridization, using resynthesis ofBrassica napus as a model. Plant Sci 43:155–162Google Scholar
  21. Sundberg E, Landgren M, Glimelius K (1987) Fertility and chromosome stability inBrassica napus resynthesized by protoplast fusion. Theor Appl Genet 75:96–104Google Scholar
  22. Sundberg E, Glimelius K (1991) Effects of parental ploidy level and genetic divergence on chromosome elimination and chloroplast segregation in somatic hybrids withinBrassicaceae. Theor Appl Genet 83:81–88Google Scholar
  23. Thorpe ML, Duke LH, Beversdorf WD (1987) Procedures for the detection of isozymes of rapeseed by starch gel electrophoresis. Agriculture Canada Tech Bull OAC 887, University of Guelph, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  24. Warwick SI, Black LD (1991) Molecular systematics ofBrassica and allied genera (subtribe Brassicinae, Brassiceae) — chloroplast genome and cytodeme congruence. Theor Appl Genet 82:81–92Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Jourdan
    • 1
  • E. Salazar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of HorticultureThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations