Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The purpose of knowledge: pragmatism and the praxis of marxist criminology

  • 112 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

Abstract

This paper revives and revises the argument that there is no place for a concept of crime in marxist theory, and consequently that there is no theoretical justification for the development of marxist criminology. However, earlier essays along these lines have adopted a rationalist epistemology in advancing this case — with its attendant difficulties of idealism, privileged conceptualization and inflexibility. The present paper attempts to escape such problems, and to extend the critique of criminological theorization, by developing its case on the basis of a pragmatist epistemology. It is argued that the conflicting aims of marxist theory and the bourgeois legal theory from which ‘crime’ is transferred make it difficult for marxist criminology to generate a unified theory to guide political practice and research. Moreover, Marxists' privileging of the concept of crime may be systematically blinding them to political developments which render criminology historically obsolescent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abel, R. (1981). ‘A critique of American tort law’,British Journal of Law and Society 8: 199–231.

  2. Abel, R. (1982). ‘The contradictions of informal justice’, in: R. Abel (ed.)The politics of informal justice. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.

  3. Anderson, P. (1980).Arguments within English marxism. London: NLB/Verso.

  4. Balbus, I. (1977). ‘Commodity from and legal form. An essay on the relative autonomy of the law’,Law and Society Review 11: 571–588.

  5. Bankowski, Z., Mungham, G. and Young, P. (1977). ‘Radical criminology or radical criminologist?’Contemporary Crises 1: 37–52.

  6. Barnett, H. (1979). ‘Wealth, Crime and Capital Accumulation’,Contemporary Crises 3: 171–180.

  7. Block, A. and Chambliss, W. (1981).Organizing crime. New York: Elsevier.

  8. Boehringer, G., Brown, D., Edgeworth, B., Hogg, R. and Ramsay, I. (1983). ‘Law and order for progressives? An Australian response’,Crime and Social Justice 9: 2–12.

  9. Cain, M. (1985). ‘Beyond informal justice’,Contemporary crises 9: 287–327.

  10. Carson, W. (1980). ‘The ambiguity of white collar crime’, in: M. Fitzgerald et al. (eds)Crime and Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

  11. Carson, W. (1981).The other price of Britain's oil. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

  12. Charney, J. (1974). ‘The need for constitutional protections for defendants in civil penalty cases’,Cornell Law Review 59: 478–497.

  13. Clarke, D. (1978). ‘Marxism, justice and the justice model’,Contemporary Crises 2: 27–62.

  14. Cohen, S. (1979). ‘The punitive city. Notes on the dispersal of social control’,Contemporary Crises 3: 339–363.

  15. Cohen, S. (1984).Visions of social control. London: Macmillan.

  16. Cutler, A., Hindess, B., Hirst, P. and Hussain, A. (1977).Marx's ‘Capital’ and capital today. Vol. 1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  17. Fitzpatrick, P. (1983). ‘Marxism and legal pluralism’,Australian Journal of Law and Society 1: 46–58.

  18. Foucault, M. (1977).Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.

  19. Frankel, B. (1983).Beyond the state? Dominant theories and socialist strategies. London: Macmillan.

  20. Freese, L. and Sell, J. (1980). ‘Constructing axiomatic theories in sociology’, in: L. Freese (ed.)Theoretical methods in sociology. Seven essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

  21. Freiberg, A. (1984).The civil offense. Melbourne: Monash University. Unpublished LLM Thesis.

  22. Freiberg, A. and O'Malley, P. (1984). ‘State intervention and the civil offense’,Law and Society Review 18: 373–394.

  23. Garland, D. (1985). ‘The Criminal and His Science’,British Journal of Criminology 25: 109–137.

  24. Greenberg, D. (1981).Crime and capitalism. Readings in marxist criminology. New York: Mayfield.

  25. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J. and Roberts, B. (1978).Policing the crisis. Mugging, the state, and law and order. London: Macmillan.

  26. Henry, S. (1985). ‘Community justice, capitalist society and human agency’,Law and Society Review 19: 303–321.

  27. Hinch, R. (1983). ‘Marxist criminology in the 1970s: Clarifying the clutter’,Crime and Social Justice 19: 65–74.

  28. Hindess, B. and Hirst, P. (1977).Mode of Production and Social Formation. London: MacMillan.

  29. Hirst, P. (1975). ‘Marx and Engels on law, crime and morality’, in: I. Taylor, P. Walton and J. Young (eds) (1975).Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  30. Hulsman, L. (1986). ‘Critical Criminology and the Concept of Crime’,Contemporary Crises 10: 63–80.

  31. Kerruish, V. and Duncanson, I. (1986). ‘The regulation of civil liberty’,Law in Context 4: 1–28.

  32. Lea, J. and Young, J. (1984).What is to be done about law and order? London: Penguin Books.

  33. Linebaugh, P. (1976). ‘Karl Marx, the theft of wood and working class composition’,Crime and Social Justice 6: 36–53.

  34. Matza, D. (1969).Becoming deviant. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

  35. O'Malley, P. (1979). ‘Class struggle, land and social banditry’,Social Problems 26: 271–283.

  36. O'Malley, P. (1982a). ‘The invisible censor. Civil law and the state delegation of press control 1890–1952’,Media, Culture and Society 4: 323–337.

  37. O'Malley, P. (1982b). ‘Historical practice and the production of marxist legal theory’,Crime and Social Justice 18: 53–61.

  38. O'Malley, P. (1985). ‘The illegal sector of capital. A theoretical examination of “Organizing crime”’,Contemporary Crises 9: 81–92.

  39. O'Malley, P. (1987a). ‘Marxist Theory and Marxist Criminology’,Crime and Social Justice.

  40. O'Malley, P. (1987b). ‘Regulating contradictions. The Australian Press Council and the dispersal of social control’,Law and Society Review 21: 101–126.

  41. O'Malley, P. (Forthcoming). ‘The Place of Crime in Popular History’, in: V. Burgmann and J. Lee (eds)Australia Since the British invasion, Vol. 3. Melbourne: McPhee Gribble.

  42. Pashukanis, E. (1978).Law and marxism. A general theory. London: Ink Links.

  43. Reasons, C., Ross, L. and Patterson, C. (1982). ‘Your money or your life. Workers' health in Canada’,Crime and Social Justice 17: 55–60.

  44. Rorty, R. (1982).Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  45. Schwendinger, J. and Schwendinger, H. (1975). ‘Defenders of order or guardians of human rights?’, in: I. Taylor et al. (eds)Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  46. Spitzer, S. (1980). ‘Left Wing’ Criminology — An Infant Disorder?’, in: J. Inciardi (ed.)Radical Criminology: The Coming Crisis. Beverly Hills: Sage publications.

  47. Spitzer, S. (1982). ‘The dialectics of formal and informal control’, in: R. Abel (ed.)The politics of informal justice. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.

  48. Steinert, H. (1986). ‘Beyond crime and punishment’,Contemporary Crises 10: 21–38.

  49. Sutherland, E. (1949).White Collar Crime. New York: Dryden Press.

  50. Taylor, I. (1981).Law and order. Arguments for socialism. London: Macmillan.

  51. Taylor, I. and Walton, P. (1975). ‘Radical Deviancy Theory: A Reply to Paul Q. Hirst’, in: I. Taylor, P. Walton and J. Young (eds) (1975).Critical Criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  52. Taylor, I. (1975). ‘Critical Criminology in Britain. Review and Prospects’, in: I. Taylor et al. (eds)Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  53. Thompson, E. (1975).Whigs and hunters. The origins of the Black Act. London: Allen Lane.

  54. Thompson, E. (1978). ‘The poverty of theory’, in: E. Thompson (ed.)The poverty of theory and other essays. London: Merlin Press.

  55. Winslow, C. (1975). ‘Sussex smugglers’, in: D. Hay, P. Linebaugh, J. Rule, E. Thompson and C. Winslow (eds)Albion's fatal tree. London: Allen Lane.

  56. Young, J. (1975). ‘Working Class Criminology’, in: I. Taylor et al. (eds)Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Malley, P. The purpose of knowledge: pragmatism and the praxis of marxist criminology. Contemporary Crises 12, 65–79 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00728659

Download citation

Keywords

  • Unify Theory
  • International Relation
  • Legal Theory
  • Political Development
  • Theoretical Justification