Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Cultural attitudes: in contexts of argumentation and explanation

  • 78 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Traditionally, attitudes are supposed to predict behavior. However, due to their poor performance, we are sometimes advised to abandon the notion. The present study attempts to preserve the concept but takes attitudes to be evaluative goals accomplished through interactional, especially argumentative and explanatory activities. The paper uses reasoned-discourse analysis and demonstrates the attainment of positive attitudes towards the Dutch by expatriate Chinese intellectuals in the Netherlands by attending to a variety of argumentative and explanatory strategies in their interview talk. Results suggest that there is good empirical reason to believe that attitudes are accomplishments of communicating actors' rhetorical contextualizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allport, G. W.: 1935, ‘Attitudes’, in C. Murchison (ed.),Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Worcester, Mass: Clark University Press.

  2. Antaki, C. (ed.): 1988,Analysing Everyday Explanation: A casebook of methods. London: Sage Publications.

  3. Antaki, C.: 1994,Explaining and Arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage Publications.

  4. Antaki, C. and I. Leudar: 1992, ‘Explaining in Conversation: Towards an Argument Model’,European Journal of Social Psychology. 22, 181–194

  5. Atkinson, J. M. and J. Heritage (eds): 1984, Structures of Social Action: Studies in conversation analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  6. Billig, M.: 1987,Arguing and Thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  7. Billig M.: 1988, ‘Methodology and Scholarship in Understanding Ideological Explanation’, in Charles Antaki (ed.),Analysing Everyday Explanation: A casebook of methods, London: Sage Publications, pp. 199–215.

  8. Bilmes, J: 1986,Discourse and Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

  9. Cicourel, A. V.: 1981, ‘Notes on the Integration of Micro- and Macro-levels of Analysis’, in K. Knorr-Cetina and A. V. Cicourel (eds.)Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 51–80.

  10. Deutscher, I.: 1973,What We Say/What We Do, Glenview: Scott, Foresman.

  11. Draper, Stephen W.: 1988, ‘What's going on in everyday explanation?’ in C. Antaki (ed.),Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods, London: Sage Publications, pp. 15–31

  12. Duranti, A.: 1988, ‘Ethnography of Speaking: Toward a Linguistics of Praxis’, in F. Newmeyer (ed.),Language: The socio-cultural context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  13. Fairclough, N.: 1989,Language and Power, London: Longman.

  14. Fairclough, N.: 1992,Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.

  15. Festinger, L.: 1957,A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Evanston, Illinois: Row, Peterson.

  16. Fishbein, M.: 1967, ‘Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior’, in M. Fishbein, (ed.)Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, New York: Wiley.

  17. Fowler, R., B. Hodge, G. Kress and T. Trew: 1979,Language and Control, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  18. Gilbert, G. Nigel & M. Mulkay: 1984,Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  19. Govier, T.: 1987,Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

  20. Govier, T.: 1992, APractical Study of Argument, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

  21. Gumperze, J. J.: 1982a,Discourse Strategies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  22. Gumperze, J. J.: 1982b,Language and Social Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  23. Heritage, J.: 1984,Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, Cambridge: Polity Press.

  24. Hoaglund, J.: 1987, ‘Arguments and Explanations’, in F. H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles A. Willard (eds.),Proceedings of the Conference on Argumentation, 1986, Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 389–94.

  25. Hodge, R. and G. Kress: 1988,Social Semiotics, Cambridge: Polity Press.

  26. Hodge, R. and G. Kress: 1993,Language as Ideology, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.

  27. Houtlosser, P.: 1994, The Speech Act ‘Advancing a Standpoint’, in F. H. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst (eds.),Studies in Pragma-Dialectics, Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

  28. Jaspars, J and C. Fraser: 1984, ‘Attitudes and Social Representations’, in Robert M. Farr and Serge Moscovici (eds.),Social Representations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  29. Kopperschmidt, J.: 1987, ‘The Function of Argumentation: A Pragmatic Approach’, in F. H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles A. Williard (eds.),Proceedings of the Conference on Argumentation, 1986, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

  30. Kress, G.: 1994,Text, Discourse and Context. London: Longman.

  31. Levinson, S. C.: 1992, ‘Activity Types and Language’, in Paul Drew and John Heritage (eds.),Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  32. Maier, R.: 1992, ‘Argumentation and Power,’ in F. H. van Eemeren, Rob Groodendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard (eds.),Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation, Amsterdam: Stichting International Centrum voor de Studie van Argumentatie en Taalbeheersing (SICSAT).

  33. Manis, M.: 1985, ‘Attitudes’, in A. Kuper and J. Kuper,The Social Science Encyclopedia, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  34. Mey, L. Jacob: 1993Pragmatics: An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.

  35. Meyer, M.: 1983,Meaning and Reading: A Philosophical Essay on Language and Literature, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

  36. McGuire, W. J.: 1985, ‘Attitudes and Attitude Change’, in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.),Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed. Vol. 2. New York: Random House.

  37. Meeuwis, M.: 1994, ‘Leniency and Testiness in Intercultural Communication: Remarks on Ideology and Context in Interactional Sociolinguistics’,Pragmatics 4(3), 391–407.

  38. Morris, M.: 1981,Saying and Meaning in Puerto Rico: Some problems in the ethnography of discourse, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  39. Pander-Matt, H.: 1987, ‘Arguer Goals and the Termination of Dialogical Arguments,’ in F. H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles A. Willard (eds.),Proceedings of the Conference on Argumentation, 1986, Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 110–18.

  40. Parker, I.: 1989,The Crisis in Modern Social Psychology: and How to End it, London: Routledge.

  41. Parker, I.: 1992,Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology, London: Routledge.

  42. Potter, J. and Wetherell, M.: 1987,Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour, London: Sage Publications.

  43. Sacks, H.: 1984, ‘Notes on Methodology,’ in Atkinson, J. M. and J. Heritage (eds.),Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–7.

  44. Sacks, H.: 1992a, b:Lectures on Conversation: I, II, Oxford: Blackwell.

  45. Sbisá, M.: 1987, ‘Acts of Explanation: a Speech Act Analysis’, in F. H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles A. Willard (eds.),Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches: Proceedings of the conference on argumentation, 1986, Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 7–17.

  46. Schiffrin, D.: 1985, ‘Everyday Argument: The Organization of Diversity in Talk’, in Teun A. van Dijk (ed.)Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol 3, London: Academic Press, pp. 35–45.

  47. Schiffrin, D.: 1994,Approaches to Discourse, Oxford: Blackwell.

  48. Schegloff, E.: 1992, ‘In Another Context,’ in Duranti, Alessandro and Charles Goodwin (eds.),Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 191–227.

  49. Schuman, H. & Johnson, M. P.: 1976, ‘Attitudes and Behavior,’Annual Review of Sociology 2; 161–207.

  50. Shi-xu: 1992, Argumentation, Explanation and Social Cognition’,Text 12 (2), 263–91.

  51. Shi-xu: 1994a, ‘Ideology: Strategies of Reason and Function of Control in Accounts of the Non-Western Other,’Journal of Pragmatics 21 (6), 655–679.

  52. Shi-xu: 1994b: ‘Discursive Attributions and Cross-cultural Communication,’Pragmatics 4 (3), 337–355.

  53. Shotter, J.: 1993,Conversational Realities: Constructing Life Through Language, London: Sage Publications.

  54. Tannen, D.: 1984,Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends, Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

  55. Thibault, P. J.: 1991,Social Semiotics as Praxis: Text, Social Meaning Making and Nabokov's Ada, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  56. Tracy, K.: (1995), ‘Action-implicative Discourse Analysis,’Journal of Language and Social Psychology.14, 195–214.

  57. Trapp, R.: 1992, ‘Everyday Argumentation From an Interpretative Perspective,’ in Benoit, William L., Dale Hample and Pamela J. Benoit (eds.),Readings in Argumentation, Berlin: Foris Publications, pp. 205–18.

  58. Van Dijk, T. A.: 1984,Prejudice in Discourse: An Analysis of Ethnic Prejudice in Cognition and Conversation, Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  59. Van Dijk, T. A.: 1987,Communicating Racism, London: Sage Publications.

  60. Van Dijk, T. A.: 1993a, ‘Editor's Foreword to Critical Discourse Analysis,’Discourse and Society,4(2), 131–32.

  61. Van Dijk, T. A.: 1993b, ‘Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis’,Discourse and Society. 4(2), 249–83.

  62. Van Eemeren, F. and R. Grootendorst: 1992,Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  63. Van Eemeren, F. R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993,Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Albama Press.

  64. Von Wright, G. H.: 1971,Explanation and Understanding, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  65. Wetherell, M. and J. Potter: 1992,Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and Legitimation of Exploitation, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

  66. Williard, C. A.: 1989,A Theory of Argumentation, Tuscaloosa, Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi-Xu Cultural attitudes: in contexts of argumentation and explanation. Argumentation 9, 371–398 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00721967

Download citation

Key words

  • Accomplishments
  • argumentation
  • attitudes
  • context
  • explanation
  • reasoneddiscourse analysis
  • social psychology