Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Restriction endonuclease/nick translation procedure on fixed chromosomes of the Atlantic salmon fish cell line

  • 39 Accesses

  • 6 Citations


We have used a restriction endonuclease/nick translation (RE/NT) procedure to study the ability of restriction enzymes to cleave DNA in fixed chromosomes of a fish cell line. This technique has proved to be very useful in revealing the chromatin heterogeneity underlying the chromosome structure that remains cryptic to other techniques also able to induce longitudinal differentation on fish chromosomes. The differences observed in the banding patterns after nick translation procedure seem to be due, at least in part, to differences in activity among the enzymes assayed. The results obtained also reveal some evidence about the origin and evolution of the marker chromosomes of the Atlantic salmon cell line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Adolph S (1988)In situ nick translation distinguishes between C-band positive regions on mouse chromosomes.Chromosoma 96: 102–106.

  2. Adolph S, Hameister H (1990)In situ nick translation of human metaphase chromosomes with the restriction enzymes MspI and HpaII reveals and R-band pattern.Cytogenet Cell Genet 54: 132–136.

  3. Bianchi MS, Bianchi NO, Pantelias GE, Wolff S (1985) The mechanism and pattern of banding induced by restriction endonucleases in human chromosomes.Chromosoma 91: 131–136.

  4. Bullerdiek J, Dittmer J, Faehre Aet al. (1985) A new banding pattern of human chromosomes byin situ nick translation using EcoRI and biotin-dUTP.Clin Genet 28: 173–176.

  5. Bullerdiek J, Dittmer J, Faehre A, Bartnitzke S (1986) An improved method forin situ nick translation of human chromosomes with biotin 11-labelled dUTP detected by biotinylated alkaline phosphatase.Cytobios 45: 35–43.

  6. Burkholder GD (1989) Morphological and biochemical effects of endonucleases on isolated mammalian chromosomes ‘in vitro’.Chromosoma 97: 347–355.

  7. De la Torre J, Mitchell AR, Sumner T (1991) Restriction endonuclease/nick translation of fixed mouse chromosomes: a study of factors affecting digestion of chromosomal DNAin situ.Chromosoma 100: 203–211.

  8. De la Torre J, Sumner T, Gosálvez J and Stuppia L (1992) The distribution of genes on human chromosomes as studied byin situ nick translation.Genome 35: 890–894.

  9. De la Torre J, López-Fernández C, Herrero P, Gosálvez J (1993)In situ nick translation of meiotic chromosomes to demonstrate homologous heterochromatin heterogeneity.Genome 36: 268–270.

  10. Fernández-Peralta AM, Tagarro I, Ludeña Reyes Pet al. (1991) Time-dependentAluI action on human chromosomes.Genetica 84: 191–194.

  11. Hartley SE (1987) The chromosomes of salmonid fishes.Biol Rev 62: 197–214.

  12. Kerem BS, Goitein R, Diamond G, Cedar H, Marcus M (1984) Mapping of DNaseI sensitive regions on mitotic chromosomes.Cell 38: 493–499.

  13. Kornberg A, Baker TA (1992) DNA polymerase I ofE. coli. In: Kornberg A, Baker TA, eds.DNA Replication. New York: W H Freeman, pp 113–164.

  14. Mezzanotte R, Ferrucci L, Vanni R, Sumner AT (1985) Some factors affecting the action of restriction endonucleases on human metaphase chromosomes.Exp Cell Res 161: 247–253.

  15. Miller DA, Miller OJ (1990) Restriction enzyme banding of metaphase chromosomes. In: Sharma T ed.Trends in Chromosome Research. New York: Springer, pp 338–350.

  16. Miller DA, Choi Y-C, Miller OJ (1983) Chromosome localisation of highly repetitive human DNAs and amplified ribosomal DNA with restriction enzymes.Science 219: 395–397.

  17. Miller DA, Gosden JR, Hastie ND, Evans HJ (1984) Mechanism of endonuclease banding of chromosomes.Exp Cell Res 155: 294–298.

  18. Nicholson BL, Byrne C (1973) An established cell line from the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).J. Fish Res Board Can 30: 913–916.

  19. Sánchez L, Abuín M, Amaro R (1993) Cytogenetic characterization of the AS cell line derived from the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.).Cytogenet Cell Genet 64: 35–38.

  20. Sumner AT (1990) Banding with nucleases. In: Summer AT, ed.Chromosome Banding. London: Unwin Hyman, pp 253–274.

  21. Sumner AT, Taggart MH, Mezzanotte R, Ferrucci L (1990) Patterns of digestion of human chromosomes by restriction endonucleases demonstrated byin situ nick translation.Histochem J 22: 639–652.

  22. Tagarro I, González-Aguilera JJ, Fernández-Peralta AM, De Stefano GF, Ferrucci L (1993) Distribution of TaqI sites along human chromosomes revealed byin situ enzymenick translation.Genome 36: 202–205.

  23. Vig BK (1984) Sequence of centroinere separation: orderly segregation of multicentric chromosomes in mouse L cells.Chromosoma 90: 39–45.

  24. Vig BK, Zinkowski RP (1986) Sequence of centromere separation: a mechanism for orderly separation of dicentrics.Cancer Genet Cytogenet 22: 347–359.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Laura Sánchez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abuín, M., Martínez, P. & Sánchez, L. Restriction endonuclease/nick translation procedure on fixed chromosomes of the Atlantic salmon fish cell line. Chromosome Res 3, 379–385 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710020

Download citation

Key words

  • fish chromosomes
  • nick translation
  • RE digestion