Laboratory scale porous media biofilm reactors were used to evaluate the effect of biofilm thickness on media porosity and permeability. Media tested consisted of three different sizes of sand (0.4, 0.3, and 0.2 mm). A set of fifteen columns was used in this experiment, five columns for each size of sand. Columns were operated under constant piezometric head (2.5 m) conditions, resulting in a decreasing flow rate with biofilm development. During the experiment, variations in the piezometric head, substrate concentration, and growth in biomass as well as volatile solids were monitored in space and time. Phenol (15 mg/L) was used as a growth substrate. The reductions in hydraulic conductivity were found to be 97% for the coarse sand (0.4 mm), 96% for the medium size sand (0.3 mm), and 93.7% for the fine sand (0.2 mm). The respective removal of phenol in these columns was 96% for the coarser sand, 97.9% for the medium size sand, and 98.8% for the finer sand. Steady-state effluent phenol concentrations occurred simultaneously with uniform hydraulic conductivity reduction after 50 days of operation. The concentration of volatile solids near the column inlets and outlets, after 58 days of operation, ranged between 9.8 and 4.04 mg/g for the coarse sand, 11.2 and 6.2 mg/g for the medium size sand, and 11.8 and 6.2 mg/g of sand for the fine sand, respectively. The number of colonies near the column inlets and outlets was 2800 × 1010/mL and 1480 x 1010/mL for the coarse sand, and 2840 × 1010/mL and 1520 × 1010/mL for the medium sand, and 2890 × 1010/mL and 2120 × 1010/mL for the fine sand.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Allison, L.E.: 1947,Soil Science 3, 439.
APHA-AWWA-WPCF: 1986,Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewaters, 16th Edition, Washington, D.C.
ASTM; 1990, 04.
Characklis, W.G.: 1973,Water Research 7, 1113.
Characklis, W.G.: 1981,Biotechnology & Bioengineering 23, 1923.
Christiansen, J.E.: 1944,Soil Science 18, 355.
Chopra, S.L., and Kanwar: 1976,Analytical Agricultural Chemistry February 1976, p. 162.
Chudoba, J. and Albokova, J.: 1989,Water Research 23, 1206.
Cunningham, A.: 1991,Environmental Science & Technology,25, 1305.
Gupta, R.P. and D. Swarzendruber: 1962,Soil Science,98, 73.
Jenneman, G.E. and Knapp, R.M.: 1984,Society Petroleum Engineering Journal,24, 33.
Kalish, P.J. and Bennett, E.O.: 1964,Society of Petroleum Engineers,7, 805.
Khondaker, AX: 1991,Ph.D. Dissertation, KFUPM, Dhahran.
Nakhla, G.F., and Al-Harazin, I.M.: 1992,Engineering Technology 14, 751.
Picologlou, B.F., Zelfer, N., and Characklis, WG.: 1980,Journal Hydraulic Division, ASCE.106, 821.
Raiders, R.A. and McInerney, M.J.: 1986,Sanitary Engineering Division Journal, ASCE,1, 195.
Realeich, J.T. and Flock, D.L.: 1965,Petroleum Transactions,25, 201.
Robinson, J.A. and Trulear, M.G.: 1984,Biotechnology & Bioengineering XXV, 1409.
Show, G.C. and Bramhill, B.: 1985,Applied Environmental Microbiology,49, 693.
Taylor, S.W. and Jaffe, P.R.: 1990a,Water Resources Research 26, 2153.
Taylor, S.W. and Jaffe, P.R.: 1990b,Water Resources Research 26, 2160.
Vandevivere, P., and Baveye, P.: 1992,Water Resources Research,28, 1.
Wollum, A.G.: 1982,Methods of soil analysis, part II-Microbiology, 2nd edition, p. 787.
About this article
Cite this article
Essa, M.H., Farooq, S. & Nakhla, G.F. Simulation of in-situ bioremediation of phenol contaminated sandy aquifers I. Effect of sand sizes. Water Air Soil Pollut 87, 267–281 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00696841
- Hydraulic Conductivity
- Fine Sand
- Coarse Sand
- Volatile Solid
- Medium Sand