Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Discriminative stimulus effects of a low dose of apomorphine in the rat

Abstract

The discriminative stimulus (DS) effect of apomorphine was investigated in rats trained in a two-lever, food-reinforcement procedure. Rats were given subcutaneous injections of saline or 0.1 mg/kg apomorphine HCl, 15 min before training sessions. The training dose of apomorphine was chosen to activate dopamine autoreceptors selectively. Stimulus generalization studies demonstrated that the DS effects generalized completely to other directacting dopaminergic agonists such as N-n-propylnorapomorphine (NPNA), pergolide, lergotrile, and bromocriptine. The indirect-acting dopamine agonists, (+)amphetamine, cocaine, and methylphenidate produced predominantly saline-appropriate lever responses. The DS effect of apomorphine at the training dose was incompletely antagonized by haloperidol or metoclopramide. The dopaminergic antagonists tested, however, also partially generalized to apomorphine. Both enantiomers of 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine (3-PPP) produced apomorphine-appropriate lever choice with the (-) enantiomer being slightly more potent. The discriminative property of this (0.1 mg/kg) dose of apomorphine has characteristics consistent with selective dopamine autoreceptor activation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arnt J, Bogeso KP, Christensen AV, Hyttel J, Larsen J-J, Svendsen O (1983) Dopamine receptor agonistic and antagonistic effects of 3-PPP enantiomers. Psychopharmacology 81:199–207

  2. Bradbury AJ, Cannon JG, Costall B, Naylor RJ (1984) A comparison of dopamine agonist action to inhibit locomotor activity and to induce stereotyped behavior in the mouse. Eur J Pharmacol 105:33–47

  3. Brown F, Campbell W, Mitchell PJ, Randall K (1985) Dopamine autoreceptors and the effects of drugs on locomotion and dopamine synthesis. Br J Pharmacol 84:853–860

  4. Carlsson A (1975) Dopamine autoreceptors. In: Almgren O, Carlsson A, Engel J (eds) Chemical tools in catecholamine research, vol II. pp 219–224

  5. Clark D, Hjorth S, Carlsson A (1985a) Dopamine-receptor agonists: mechanisms underlying autoreceptor selectivity. I. Review of the evidence. J Neural Transm 62:1–52

  6. Clark D, Hjorth S, Carlsson A (1985b) Dopamine-receptor agonists: mechanisms underlying autoreceptor selectivity. II. Theoretical considerations. J Neural Transm 62:171–207

  7. Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Kuyps JJMD, Janssen PAJ (1975) Apomorphine as a discriminative stimulus, and its antagonist by haloperidol. Eur J Pharmacol 32:383–386

  8. Colpaert FC, Kuyps JJMD, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1976a) Discriminative stimulus properties of a low dl-amphetamine dose. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 223:34–42

  9. Colpaert FC, Leysen JEMF, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1976b) Blockade of apomorphine's discriminative stimulus properties: relation to neuroleptic activity in neuropharmacological and biochemical assays. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 5:671–679

  10. Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1976c) Fentanyl and apomorphine: asymmetrical generalization of discriminative stimulus properties 15:541–545

  11. Corsini GU, DelZompo M, Manconi S, Cianchetti C, Mangoni A, Gessa GL (1977) Sedative, hypnotic and antipsychotic effects of low doses of apomorphine in man. Adv Biochem Psychopharmacol 16:645–648

  12. Costall B, Fortune DH, Hui SG, Naylor RJ (1980) Neuroleptic antagonism of the motor inhibitory effects of apomorphine within the nucleus accumbens: drug interaction at presynaptic receptors? Eur J Pharmacol 63:347–358

  13. Hernandez LL, Holohean AM, Appel JB (1978) Effects of opiates on the discriminative stimulus properties of dopamine agonists. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:459–463

  14. Hjorth S, Calsson A, Clark D, Svensson K, Wikstrom H, Sanchez D, Lindberg P, Hacksell U, Arvidsson LE, Johansson A, Nilsson JLG (1983) Central dopamine receptor agonist and antagonist actions of the enantiomers of 3-PPP. Psychopharmacology 81:89–99

  15. Ho BT, Huang JT (1975) Role of dopamine ind-amphetamine-induced discriminative responding. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 3:1085–1092

  16. Ho BT, Silverman PB (1978) Stimulants as discriminative stimuli. In: Colpaert FC, Rosecrans JA (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. pp 53–68

  17. Huang JT, Ho BT (1974) Discriminative stimulus properties ofd-amphetamine and related compounds in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2:669–673

  18. Holohean AM, White FJ, Appel JB (1982) Dopaminergic and serotonergic mediation of the discriminable effects of ergot alkaloids. Eur J Pharmacol 81:595–602

  19. Janssen PAJ, Niemegeers CJE, Schellekens K (1965) Is it possible to predict the clinical effects of neuroleptic drugs (major tranquillisers) from animal data? Arzneimittelforsch 15:104–117

  20. Maickel RP, Levine RM, Guirce CM (1974) Differential effects ofd- andl-amphetamine on spontaneous motor activity in mice. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 8:711–714

  21. Maj J, Grabowski M, Gajda L (1972) Effect of apomorphine on motility in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 17:208–214

  22. Martin GE, Williams M, Haubrich DR (1982) A pharmacological comparison of 6,7-dihydroxy-2-dimethylaminotetralin (TL-99) and N-n-propyl-3(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidine (3-PPP) with selected dopamine agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 223:298–304

  23. Meltzer HY (1982) Dopamine autoreceptor stimulation: clinical significance. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17 Suppl 1:1–10

  24. Pedersen V, Christensen AV (1972) Antagonism of methylphenidate-induced steroetyped gnawing in mice. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 31:488–495

  25. Roth RH (1979) Dopamine autoreceptors: pharmacology, function and comparison with post-synaptic dopamine receptors. Commun Psychopharmacol 3:429–445

  26. Schechter MD, Cook PG (1975) Dopaminergic mediation of the interoceptive cue produced by d-amphetamine in rats. Psychopharmacology 42:185–193

  27. Schechter MD, Rosecrans JA (1973)d-Amphetamine as discriminative cue: drugs with similar stimulus properties. Eur J Pharmacol 21:212–216

  28. Stolerman IP, D'Mello GD (1981) Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats. Psychopharmacology 73:295–303

  29. Stromberg U, Svensson TH (1975) Differences between (+)- and (-)-amphetamine in effects on locomotor activity andl-dopa potentiating action in mice. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 287:171–179

  30. Strombom U (1976) Catecholamine receptor agonists: Effects on motor activity and rate of tyrosine hydroxylation in mouse brain. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 292:167–176

  31. Svensson TH (1971) Functional and biochemical effects ofd- andl-amphetamine on central catecholamine neurons. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 271:170–180

  32. Tamminga CA, Schaffer MH, Smith RC, Davis JM (1978) Schizophrenic symptoms improve with apomorphine. Science 200:567–568

  33. Taylor KM, Synder SH (1971) Differential effects ofd- andl-amphetamine on behavior and on catecholamine disposition in dopamine and norepinephrine containing neurons of rat brain. Brain Res 28:295–309

  34. Walters JR, Roth RH (1976) Dopaminergic neurons: an in vivo system for measuring drug interactions with presynaptic receptors. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 296:5–14

  35. Wilson MC, Buelke J (1978) Discriminative properties ofl-amphetamine: stimulus generalization. In: Ho BT, Richards DW, Chute DL (eds) Drug discrimination and state dependent learning. pp 47–66

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to A. H. Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, A.H., Franklin, S.R. Discriminative stimulus effects of a low dose of apomorphine in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 91, 61–66 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00690928

Download citation

Key words

  • Drug discrimination
  • Apomorphine
  • Dopamine autoreceptor