Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The coding of auditory signals in the torus semicircularis of the fire-bellied toad and the grass frog: Responses to simple stimuli and to conspecific calls

  • 95 Accesses

  • 90 Citations

Summary

The function of the anuran midbrain auditory nucleus was studied by recording the responses of single cells in the torus semicircularis of the grass frog (Rana t. temporaria L.) and the fire-bellied toad (Bombina bombina (L.)) to single tone pulses, combinations of two tones, white noise, and tape-recorded conspecific calls.

About 50% of the auditory neurons in the midbrain of the fire-bellied toad, and 60–70% of those in the grass frog, are spontaneously active. In winter the proportion of spontaneously active cells is lower. The frequencies of spontaneous discharge are between 0.1 and 15.3 impulses/s.

The basic tonic and phasic responses, either excitation or inhibition, are frequently combined to form response patterns.

The distribution of characteristic frequencies among the units studied matches the frequency spectrum of the calls. Sharpness of tuning varied widely, Q10dB ranging from 0.29 to 4.5 with one exception (7.5 in one neuron).

The threshold curves are usually V-shaped but can also have the shape of a W. In some cases the response region is confined to a continuous area on the frequency-intensity surface; in others there may be separate areas, within which opposite responses are elicited.

The intensity characteristics can be classified into two main types with roughly equal frequency of occurrence — teadily rising or saturating curves, and curves decaying from a maximum on either side of the most effective SPL.

Latencies were very short (5–10 ms) in some cases, but responses could occur with latencies as long as 300 ms.

The optimal repetition rates for pulses at the best frequency are consistent with the temporal structure of the conspecific calls.

About 50% of the units studied in the toad and about 75% of those in the frog responded to the conspecific calls. Some of the neurons gave different responses to the different calls, ranging from gradation in magnitude to opposite reactions. A few units responded exclusively to the release calls.

In most cases the responses to the calls were consistent with those to the simple artificial stimuli. Magnitude gradation, opposite responses to different calls and selective responses could be ascribed primarily to the tuning characteristics of the units. In some cases, however, the temporal structure of the call was the critical parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Abbreviations

BEF:

best excitatory frequency

BIF:

best inhibitory frequency

CC:

clasping call

MC:

mating call

RC1, RC2, RC3:

first-, second-, third-order release call

TC:

territorial call

References

  1. Alfs, B., Schneider, H.: Vergleichend anatomische Untersuchungen am Labyrinth zentraleuropäischer Froschlurch-Arten (Anura). Z. Morphol. Tiere76, 129–143 (1973)

  2. Bibikov, N.G.: Neuronal impulse activity in torus semicircularis of the frogRana temporaria. J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol.10, 40–47 (1974)

  3. Brzoska, J., Walkowiak, W., Schneider, H.: Acoustic communication in the grass frog (Rana t. temporaria L.): Calls, auditory thresholds and behavioral responses. J. Comp. Physiol.118, 173–186 (1977)

  4. Capranica, R.R.: The evoked vocal response of the bullfrog: A study of communication by sound. Research monograph, No. 33. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press 1965

  5. Capranica, R.R.: Morphology and physiology of the auditory system. In: Frog neurobiology. Llinás, R., Precht, W. (eds.), pp. 551–575. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1976

  6. Ewert, J.-P., Siefert, G.: Neuronal correlates of seasonal changes in contrast-detection of prey-catching behavior in toads (Bufo bufo L.). Vision Res.14, 431–432 (1974)

  7. Feng, A.S., Capranica, R.R.: Sound localization in anurans. II. Binaural interaction in superior olivary nucleus of the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). J. Neurophysiol.41, 43–54 (1978)

  8. Feng, A.S., Narins, P.M., Capranica, R.R.: Three populations of primary auditory fibers in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana): Their peripheral origins and frequency sensitivities. J. Comp. Physiol.100, 221–229 (1975)

  9. Frishkopf, L.S., Capranica, R.R.: Auditory responses in the medulla of the bullfrog: comparison with eighth-nerve responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.40, 1262–1263 (1966)

  10. Frishkopf, L.S., Goldstein, M.H. Jr.: Responses to acoustic stimuli from single units in the eighth nerve of the bullfrog. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.35, 1219–1228 (1963)

  11. Frishkopf, L.S., Capranica, R.R., Goldstein, M.H., Jr.: Neural coding in the bullfrog's auditory system — A teleological approach. Proc. IEEE56, 969–980 (1968)

  12. Gelder, J.J. van, Evers, P.M.G., Maagnus, G.J.M.: Calling and associated behaviour of the common frog,Rana temporaria, during breeding activity. J. Anim. Ecol.47, 667–676 (1978)

  13. Gerhardt, H.C.: The significance of some spectral features in mating call recognition in the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). J. Exp. Biol.61, 229–241 (1974)

  14. Gerhardt, H.C.: Mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): The significance of some fine-temporal properties. J. Exp. Biol.74, 59–73 (1978a)

  15. Gerhardt, H.C.: Discrimination of intermediate sounds in a synthetic call continuum by female green tree frogs. Science199, 1089–1091 (1978b)

  16. Gutgesell, V.J.: Seasonal variation in the anoxia sensitivity of the lizard saccule. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.A54, 407–408 (1976)

  17. Hubl, L., Schneider, H.: Temperature and auditory thresholds: bio-acoustic studies of the frogsRana r. ridibunda, Hyla a. arborea andHyla a. savignyi (Anura, Amphibia). J. Comp. Physiol.130, 17–27 (1979)

  18. Hubl, L., Mohneke, R., Schneider, H.: Temperature dependence of auditory thresholds in two central European anurans,Bombina variegata variegata (L.) andRana ridibunda ridibunda Pall (Amphibia), and its relation to calling. Behav. Process.2, 305–314 (1977)

  19. Kaulen, R., Lifschitz, W., Palazzi Adrian, H.: Binaural interaction in the inferior colliculus of the frog. Exp. Neurol.37, 469–480 (1972)

  20. Kemali, M., Braitenberg, V.: Atlas of the frog's brain. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1969

  21. Kiang, N.Y.-S.: Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press 1965

  22. Knorr, A.: Central control of mating call production and spawning in the tree frogHyla arborea savignyi (Audouin): results of electrical stimulation of the brain. Behav. Process.1, 295–317 (1976)

  23. Lombard, R.E., Straughan, I.R.: Functional aspects of anuran middle ear structures. J. Exp. Biol.61, 71–93 (1974)

  24. Lörcher, K.: Vergleichende bio-akustische Untersuchungen an der Rotnd Gelbbauchunke,Bombina bombina (L.) undBombina v. variegata (L.). Oecologia (Berlin)3, 84–124 (1969)

  25. Moffat, A.J.M., Capranica, R.R.: Auditory sensitivity of the saccule in the American toad (Bufo americanus). J. Comp. Physiol.105, 1–8 (1976a)

  26. Moffat, A.J.M., Capranica, R.R.: Effects of temperature on the response properties of auditory nerve fibers in the American toad (Bufo americanus). J. Acoust. Soc. Am.60 (Suppl.), 80 (1976b)

  27. Mohneke, R., Schneider, H.: Effect of temperature upon auditory thresholds in two anuran species,Bombina v. variegata andAlytes o. obstetricans (Amphibia, Discoglossidae). J. Comp. Physiol.130, 9–16 (1979)

  28. Mudry, K.M., Constatine-Paton, M., Capranica, R.R.: Auditory sensitivity of the diencephalon of the leopard frogRana p. pipiens. J. Comp. Physiol.114, 1–13 (1977)

  29. Narins, P.M., Capranica, R.R.: Communicative significance of the two-note call of the treefrogEleutherodactylus coqui. J. Comp. Physiol.127, 1–9 (1978)

  30. Potter, H.D.: Patterns of acoustically evoked discharges of neurons in the mesencephalon of the bullfrog. J. Neurophysiol.28, 1155–1184 (1965)

  31. Schmidt, R.S.: Central mechanisms of frog calling. Behaviour26, 251–285 (1966)

  32. Schmidt, R.S.: Preoptic activation of frog mating behavior. Behaviour30, 239–257 (1968)

  33. Schneider, H.: Die Paarungsrufe einheimischer Ranidae (Anura, Amphibia). Bonn. Zool. Beitr.24, 51–61 (1973)

  34. Wada, M., Gorbman, A.: Mate calling induced by electrical stimulation in freely moving leopard frogs,Rana pipiens. Horm. Behav.9, 141–149 (1977)

  35. Walkowiak, W.: Sensitivity, range and temperature dependence of hearing in the grass frog and the fire-bellied toad. Behav. Process. (in press)

Download references

Author information

Additional information

I am grateful to Prof. H. Schneider for discussions during the planning of these experiments and for his generous support throughout. I also thank Prof. R.R. Capranica, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, USA, who kindly provided me with blueprints for the construction of the earphone housing and Dr. J. Rheinlaender, Ruhr-University, Bochum, for reading the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walkowiak, W. The coding of auditory signals in the torus semicircularis of the fire-bellied toad and the grass frog: Responses to simple stimuli and to conspecific calls. J. Comp. Physiol. 138, 131–148 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00680437

Download citation

Keywords

  • Temporal Structure
  • Opposite Response
  • Threshold Curve
  • Auditory Neuron
  • Selective Response