Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 129, Issue 3, pp 247–256 | Cite as

Sensory mechanisms of eye cleaning behavior in the cricket Gryllus campestris

  • H. -W. Honegger
  • H. Reif
  • W. Müller
Article

Summary

Mechanical stimulation of the compound eye of the cricket Gryllus campestris induces an eye cleaning response which involves coordinated movements of the head and the forelegs. Interommatidial bristles and campaniform sensilla provide the sensory input for the behavior. The axons of these receptors project through a sidebranch of the nervus tegumentarius into the suboesophageal and prothoracic ganglion. Recordings from this nerve revealed that only information from bristles and campaniform sensilla is transmitted and that stimuli which release eye cleaning cause many units to fire. Finally, when the nerve was cut surgically, the crickets no longer cleaned the eyes on the operated side. We suggest that the mechanoreceptors on the cricket eye are tuned to detect stimuli which could disturb vision.

Keywords

Sensory Input Mechanical Stimulation Sensory Mechanism Cleaning Behavior Prothoracic Ganglion 

Abbreviation

SNt

sidebranch of the nervus tegumentarius

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Drašlar, K.: Functional properties of trichobothria in the bug Pyrrhocoris apterus (L.). J. comp. Physiol. 84, 175–184 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eaton, R.C., Farley, R.D.: The neural control of cereal grooming behaviour in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. J. Insect Physiol. 15, 1047–1065 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoffmann, R.W.: Zur Analyse des Reflexgeschehens bei Blatta orientalis L. Z. vergl. Physiol. 18, 740–795 (1933)Google Scholar
  4. Honegger, H.-W.: Interommatidial hair receptor axons extending into the ventral nerve cord in the cricket Gryllus campestris. Cell Tiss. Res. 182, 281–285 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoppenheit, M., Laudien, H.: Untersuchungen über deplaziertes Putzen bei Blaberus craniifer (Blattaria). Zool. Anz. 182, 303–311 (1969)Google Scholar
  6. Jander, U.: Untersuchungen zur Stammesgeschichte von Putzbewegungen von Tracheaten. Z. Tierpsychol. 23, 799–844 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jung, K.: Die Säuberungshandlungen der Ameisen, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Plastizität des Nervensystems. Zool. Jb. Abt. Syst. 69, 374–416 (1969)Google Scholar
  8. Luco, J.V., Aranda, L.C.: An electrical correlate to the process of learning. Experiments in Blatta orientalis. Nature 201, 1330–1331 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moran, D.T., Chapman, K.M., Ellis, R.A.: The fine structure of cockroach campaniform sensilla. J. Cell Biol. 48, 155–173 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morisita, M.: Measuring of the dispersion of individuals and analysis of the distributional patterns. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ., Ser. E 2, 215–253 (1959)Google Scholar
  11. Müller, M.-L., Honegger, H.-W., Nickel, E., Westphal, C.: The ultrastructure of campaniform sensilla in the eye of the cricket Gryllus campestris. Cell Tiss. Res. 195, 349–357 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. O'Shea, R.M.: The antennal cleaning reflex in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton (1971)Google Scholar
  13. Pflumm, W.: Stimmungsänderungen der Biene während des Aufenthalts an der Futterquelle. Z. vergl. Physiol. 65, 299–323 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pflumm, W.: Beobachtungen zum Putzverhalten nektarsammelnder Honigbienen. Zool. Jb. Physiol. 75, 319–324 (1970)Google Scholar
  15. Pflumm, W.: Zur Steuerung der Putzbewegungen der Honigbiene. Behaviour 45, 104–122 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ridder, M. de: Plastizität des Fühlerputzens bei Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer) und mögliche neurale Ursachen. Diplom-Arbeit, Univ. zu Köln (1974)Google Scholar
  17. Rowell, C.H.F.: Central control of an insect segmental reflex. I. Inhibition by different parts of the central nervous system. J. Exp. Biol. 41, 559–572 (1964)Google Scholar
  18. Runion, H.I., Usherwood, P.N.R.: Tarsal receptors and leg reflexes in the locust and grasshopper. J. Exp. Biol. 49, 421–436 (1968)Google Scholar
  19. Spencer, H.J.: Analysis of the electrophysiological responses of the trochanteral hair receptors of the cockroach. J. Exp. Biol. 60, 223–240 (1974)Google Scholar
  20. Tautz, J.: Reception of medium vibration by thoracal hairs of caterpillars of Barathra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidea). J. comp. Physiol. 125, 67–77 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thurm, U.: Mechanoreceptors in the cuticle of the honey bee; fine structure and stimulus mechanism. Science 145, 1063–1065 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weyrauch, W.K.: Putzreflexe. Eine nervenphysiologische Studie, 1. Teil. Zool. Jb. 47, 1–26 (1930)Google Scholar
  23. Zack, S.: The effect of foreleg amputation of head grooming behavior in the praying mantis, Sphodromantis lineola. J. comp. Physiol. 125, 253–258 (1978a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zack, S.: Head grooming behavior in the praying mantis. Anim. Behav. 26, 1107–1119 (1978b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zack, S.: Description of the bahavior of praying mantis with particular reference to grooming. Behav. Proc. 3, 97–105 (1978c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. -W. Honegger
    • 1
  • H. Reif
    • 1
  • W. Müller
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachbereich Biologie der Universität KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations