Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Influence of high pressure and a pulsed magnetic field on the martensite transformation in Fe−Ni and Fe−Ni−Mn alloys

  • 27 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    Omnilateral pressure, which reduces the martensitic point, does not alter the “explosive” character of the martensite transformation in type N31 Fe−Ni alloy. Omnilateral pressure greatly reduces the transformation rate for an isothermal martensite transformation (type N23G3 alloy) and causes a reduction in the temperature of the kinetic maximum.

  2. 2.

    Preliminary plastic deformation does not reduce the transformation temperature range for N31 alloy but causes a large decrease in the extent of the first and subsequent explosions. Preliminary plastic deformation of Fe−Ni−Mn alloys, which suppresses the isothermal transformation, causes almost no reduction in the extent of the athermal transformation in a magnetic field. Tempering of the austenite inhibits the isothermal transformation but has no effect on the athermal transformation excited by pulsed fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Literature cited

  1. 1.

    O. P. Maksimova and L. G. Maistrenko, in: Problems of Metal Working and Metal Physics [in Russian], No. 9, Metallurgiya, Moscow (1968).

  2. 2.

    G. V. Kurdyumov and O. P. Maksimova, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,81 (1951).

  3. 3.

    I. Ya. Georgieva and I. I. Nikitina, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,186, No. 1 (1969).

  4. 4.

    I. Ya. Georgieva et al., Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mat.,27, No. 6 (1969).

  5. 5.

    I. Ya. Georgieva and O. P. Maksimova, Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mat.,32, No. 2 (1971).

  6. 6.

    I. I. Stregulin and N. P. Chuprakova, Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mat.,1, No. 2 (1965).

  7. 7.

    A. I. Stregulin and L. A. Mel'nikov, Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mat.,8, No. 3 (1959).

  8. 8.

    E. Scheil and W. Normann, Archiv. Eisenhuttenwesen,30, No. 12 (1959).

  9. 9.

    I. Patel and M. Cohen, Acta Metallurgica,1, No. 3 (1953).

  10. 10.

    L. A. Mel'nikov et al., Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mat.,15, No. 3 (1963).

  11. 11.

    V. D. Sadovskii et al., Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mat.,24, No. 5 (1967).

  12. 12.

    A. I. Stregulin and L. A. Mel'nikov, Zavod. Lab., No. 11 (1959).

  13. 13.

    P. A. Malinen et al., Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mat.,24, No. 2 (1967).

  14. 14.

    L. G. Zhuravlev et al., Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mat.,31, No. 2 (1971).

  15. 15.

    O. P. Maksimova et al. in: Problems of Metal Working and Metal Physics [in Russian], No. 4, Metallurgiya, Moscow (1955).

Download references

Additional information

Institute of Metal Physics, Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Translated from Metallovedenie i Termicheskaya Obrabotka Metallov, No. 9, pp. 30–37, September, 1972.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sadovskii, V.D., Malinen, P.A. & Mel'nikov, L.A. Influence of high pressure and a pulsed magnetic field on the martensite transformation in Fe−Ni and Fe−Ni−Mn alloys. Met Sci Heat Treat 14, 775–781 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00652029

Download citation

Keywords

  • Austenite
  • Martensite
  • Explosive
  • Martensite Transformation
  • Pulse Magnetic Field