Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 1119–1125 | Cite as

Tensile properties and impact behaviour of poly(D(−)3-hydroxybutyrate)/rubber blends

  • M. Abbate
  • E. Martuscelli
  • G. Ragosta
  • G. Scarinzi
Papers

Abstract

A random ethylene-propylene rubber copolymer with functional ester or anhydride groups and an ethylene vinilacetate copolymer modified by a partial transformation of acetate groups in alcoholic groups were used as minor components to obtain binary poly(D(-)3-hydroxy-butyrate) blends by melt-mixing. The influence of the rubbery impact modifier on the morphology and on the tensile and high-speed fracture behaviour of such blends was investigated. Better properties were found when anhydride groups were present on the rubbery component. This was attributed to chemical interactions occurring between the dispersed phase and the matrix during the blending process.

Keywords

Rubber Anhydride Disperse Phase Tensile Property Minor Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    M. Avella and.E. Martuscelli,Polymer 29 (1988) 1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Greco andE. Martuscelli,ibid. 30 (1989) 1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Martuscelli,Polym. Engng Sci. 24 (1984) 563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Hughes andK. R. Richardson,Eur. Pat. Appl. Vol. 46 (1982) 344.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. De Vito, N. Lanzetta, G. Maglio, M. Malinconico, P. Musto andR. Palumbo,J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Edn 22 (1984) 1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Greco, G. Maglio, E. Martuscelli, P. Musto andR. Palumbo,Polym. Proc. Engng 4 (1986) 253.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Braun, H. Cherdon andW. Kern, “Techniques of Polymer Synthesis and Characterization” (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972) p. 255.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. J. Kinloch andR. J. Young, “Fracture Behaviour of Polymer” (Applied Science, London, 1983).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Greco andG. Ragosta,J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1988) 4171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Coppola, R. Greco andG. Ragosta,ibid. 21 (1986) 1775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. F. Brown andJ. Srawley, ASTM STP410 (American Society for testing and materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1966) p. 13.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Plati andJ. G. Williams,Polym. Engng Sci. 15 (1987) 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Cecere, R. Greco, G. Ragosta, G. Scarinzi andA. Taglialatela,Polymer,31 (1990) 1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Immirzi, P. Laurienzo, M. Malinconico andE. Martuscelli,J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Edn,27 (1989) 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Laurienzo, M. Malinconico, E. Martuscelli andM. G. Volpe,Polymer 30 (1989) 835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Malinconico, private communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Abbate
    • 1
  • E. Martuscelli
    • 1
  • G. Ragosta
    • 1
  • G. Scarinzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Ricerche su Tecnologia dei Polimeri e Reologia del C.N.R.Arco Felice, NapoliItaly

Personalised recommendations