Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 2189–2194 | Cite as

Stack cracking by hydrogen embrittlement in a welded pipeline steel

  • M. Y. B. Zakaria
  • T. J. Davies
Papers

Abstract

Arrays of cracks, parallel to the original plate rolling direction, were produced in a X65 microalloyed steel by hydrogen embrittlement of pipeline sections containing a weldment. A region of the heat-affected zone of the weldment was shown to have a lower yield strength (“soft” zone) than the surrounding material and cracking was concentrated in this throughthickness zone to produce the effect known as stack cracking. In situ cathodic hydrogen charging of tensile specimens under load led to failure by linking the rolling-plane cracks with transverse cleavage cracks, which were often initiated at inclusions. All cracking was predominantly by cleavage and failure occurred in tension in short times by hydrogen embrittlement when the applied tensile stress was above about half the uncharged yield stress. The influence of microstructure, hydrogen pressure and tensile loading conditions on the location of stack cracks and the mode of fracture is discussed.

Keywords

Microstructure Yield Strength Tensile Stress Rolling Direction Tensile Specimen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Nishimura, H. Inagaki and M. Tanimura, “Hydrogen in Metals”, 2nd International Congress (1977) Paper 3E9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. J. Beifer, Materials Performance, 21(6) (1982) 19.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Bruckhoff, O. Geier, K. Hofbauer, G. Schmitt and D. Steinmetz, “Corrosion 85” paper 389.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Taira, K. Tsukada, Y. Kobayashi, H. Inagaki and T. Watanabe, Corrosion 37 (1981) 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guenter Herbsleb, Rolf K. Poepperling and Wilhem Schwenk, ibid. 36 (1980) 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Brown and C. L. Jones, ibid. 40 (1984) 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Taira, Y. Kobayashi, K. Matsumoto and K. Tsukada, ibid. 40 (1984) 478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. C. Turn Jr, B. E. Wilde and C. A. Troianos, ibid. 39 (1983) 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. W. Ciaraldi, ibid. 40 (1984) 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Makio Iino, Met. Trans. 9A (1978) 1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Y. B. Sakaria, PhD Thesis. UMIST (1989).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Hull and D. J. Bacon, “Introduction to Dislocations” (Pergamon Press, 1986) Ch. 10.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Brooksbank and K. W. Andrews, JISI 206 (1968) 595.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Y. B. Zakaria
    • 1
  • T. J. Davies
    • 2
  1. 1.Standard and Industrial Research Institute of MalaysiaShah Alam, Selangor Darul EhsanMalaysia
  2. 2.Manchester Materials Science CentreManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations