Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 26, Issue 16, pp 4511–4516 | Cite as

Sintering behaviour of gel-derived powders

  • L. Montanaro
  • A. Negro


85Al2O3-15ZrO2 (wt%) powders were synthesized by gel precipitation starting from AlCl3 · 6H2O and ZrCl4 solutions and dried by two different methods: (i) by spray-drying and (ii) via a sol-gel route by n-octanol in a pilot plant. The particles by process (i) were spherical granules of diameter 15 μm, and those by process (ii) were microspheres of 25 μm. The powders were characterized in terms of morphology, particle size distribution, surface area, weight loss and crystallization behaviour at different temperatures. Shrinkage, microstructure, density and pore size distribution were evaluated on compacts at different temperatures to study the sintering kinetics. Experimental observations suggest that (a) the use of controlled-geometry powders allows one to obtain high green densities; and (b) the sintering of gel-derived powders develops in two steps: during the first one, sintering mainly takes place inside each microsphere (or granule), and during the second step, mainly between the microspheres (or granules). At temperatures > 1100°C, sintering produces shrinkage of the microspheres (or granules) leading to pore formation between them, which prevents the achievement of high densities. Only by using hot pressing is it possible to obtain theoretical densities and high mechanical properties.


Microstructure Crystallization Shrinkage Particle Size Distribution Pore Size Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    E. Barringer, N. Jubb, B. Fegley, R. L. Pober and H. K. Bowen, in “Ultrastructure Processing of Ceramics, Glasses and Composites”, edited by L. L. Hench and D. Ulrich (Wiley, New York, 1984) Ch. 26.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. A. Bruch, Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 41 (1962) 799.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. F. Lange, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 67 (1984) 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Montanaro and B. Guilhot, Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 68 (1989) 1017.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Montanaro, P. Orlans, J. P. Lecompte, V. Specchia, A. Negro and A. Gianetto, in Proceedings of Conference on Emerging Technologies in Materials, Minneapolis, August 1987, Paper CE 1.20.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Montanaro, in “Surfaces and Interfaces of Ceramic Materials”, edited by L. C. Dufour, C. Monty and G. PetotErras (Kluwer, 1989) p. 587.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. P. Bach, PhD thesis, ENSM St. Etienne, France (1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. D. Kingery and B. Francois, in “Sintering and Related Phenomena”, edited by G. C. Kuczynski, N. A. Hooton and C. F. Gibbon (Gordon & Breach, New York, 1967) p. 471.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Montanaro, J. P. Lecompte, B. Guilhot and A. Negro, in Proceedings of 11th Riso International Symposium, Roskilde, September 1990, edited by J. J. Bentzen, J. B. Bilde-Sørensen, N. Christiansen, A. Horsewell and B. Ralph (Risø Nat. Lab., Roskilde, 1990) p. 419.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Montanaro
    • 1
  • A. Negro
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienza dei Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica, PolitecnicoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations