Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 27, Issue 16, pp 4489–4494 | Cite as

Abrasion-induced microstructural changes and material removal mechanisms in squeeze-cast aluminium alloy-silicon carbide composites

  • B. K. Prasad
  • S. V. Prasad
  • A. A. Das
Papers

Abstract

An attempt has been made to understand wear-induced subsurface microstructural changes and material removal mechanisms in squeeze-cast BS LM11 alloy dispersed with 10 vol% SiC. Particles as well as fibres of SiC were separately dispersed in the alloy matrix to determine the influence of shape of the dispersoid on the abrasion behaviour of the latter. Abrasion tests were conducted on a standard rubber wheel abrasion test apparatus. Silica sand was used as the abrasive medium. Abrasive wear rates of the specimens were found to decrease gradually with the number of test intervals until a steady state value was attained. This was attributed to the protrusion of the reinforcement phase and abrasion-induced work hardening of the matrix in regions close to the abraded surface. The dispersoid/matrix interface as well as the shape of the dispersoid was found to influence the abrasion rate of the composites. A poor dispersoid/matrix interface led to higher rate of abrasion due to pull-out of the dispersoid. On the other hand, good bonding between the dispersoid and the matrix helped the dispersoid phase to be retained by the matrix, offering reduced rate of abrasion.

Keywords

Abrasive Wear Abrasion Test Material Removal Mechanism Abrasive Medium Rubber Wheel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Banerjee, S. V. Prasad, M. K. Surappa and P. K. Rohatgi, Wear 82 (1982) 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. V. Prasad, P. K. Rohatgi and T. H. Kosel, Mater. Sci. Engng 80 (1986) 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Sato and R. Mehrabian, Metall. Trans. 7B (1976) 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. J. Bhansali and R. Mehrabian, J. Metals 32 (1982) 30.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. K. Surappa, S. V. Prasad and P. K. Rohatgi, Wear 77 (1982) 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Banerjee, M. K. Surappa and P. K. Rohatgi, Metall Trans. 14B (1983) 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. K. Rohatgi, B. C. Pai and S. C. Panda, J. Mater. Sci. 14 (1979) 2277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. J. Lin and K. S. Liu, Wear 121 (1988) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. L. Rice, H. Nowotny and S. F. Wayne, Wear 74 (1981) 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. A. Moore and R. M. Douthwaite, Met. Trans. 7A (1976) 1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. A. Rigney and J. P. Hirth, Wear 53 (1979) 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. A. Das, M. Yacoub, B. Zantout and A. J. Clegg, Cast Metals 1 (1988) 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    “Standard practice for conducting dry sand/rubber wheel ASTM standard G65-81 abrasion tests” (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1981).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. K. Rohatgi and B. C. Pai, Wear 28 (1974) 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. M. Mashloosh and T. S. Eyre, Tribo. Int. 18 (1985) 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. H. Kosel and N. F. Fiore, “Abrasion in wear resistant steels”, Final report to Decree and Company Centre, Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Notre Dame (1980).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. V. Prasad and T. H. Kosel, Wear 95 (1984) 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. K. Prasad
    • 1
  • S. V. Prasad
    • 1
  • A. A. Das
    • 2
  1. 1.Regional Research LaboratoryHabibganj Naka, BhopalIndia
  2. 2.Department of Manufacturing EngineeringLoughborough University of TechnologyLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations